On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 the voices made Mike Leone write:
> However, 90+% of the time, you want the reply to be public; that's why you're
> on a public mailing list, no? So why set the defaults to cater to a special
> case, in stead of the majority case?
Exactly, which is why I, on my own lists, always set a reply-to to the list if
there's no reply-to set already; meaning that unless the sender says otherwise
the reply goes to the list, just as he wants it to.
I don't really understand why some people think this is a bad thing, it stops
more problems that it creates.
/Tony
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= #
perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
