Last week I posted a section of California law that permits ISPs to sue spammers if the spammer has been notified that the ISP does not accept spam. The law makes mention of automatic notification by the receivning email server, indiciating that notification would be sufficient. However, the law implies this is a "future capability" of email systems. One responder on this list said he/she included something in the HELO response on the SMTP server. Does anyone know of any standards in this area as to what a legally enforcible "no spam" SMTP response would be? I'll look forward to responses and also check with the CA Attorney General.
THANKS! Harold ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
