At Fri Dec 13 18:46:52 2002, Steve Thomas wrote: > > | email systems. One responder on this list said he/she included something > | in the HELO response on the SMTP server. Does anyone know of any standards > | in this area as to what a legally enforcible "no spam" SMTP response would > > <disclaimer> > I Am Not A Lawyer > </disclaimer> > > I don't really know about the enforceability of these types of notices, but > Verisign has a policy of prepending a "NOTICE AND TERMS OF USE" to the > response to a whois query, which is supposedly legally binding.
I can't see a spammer (or their spamming tools) routinely performing whois look-ups to find targets, when there are so many easier routes to find addresses. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
