Duncan Findlay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/13/02 at 00:40: > Fair enough, I guess. On the Debian lists, Mail-Followup-To is the > header everyone lives by. (Probably because we all use mutt)
Not everyone. :-) When I read my email from work, I do it via Squirrelmail, a web client. At home is either mutt or Evolution, depending on the machine. > > I haven't figured out how to set my reply-to, so I'll just keep > reading the same thing twice. It's not half as bad as spam. :-) With mutt, "L" (list reply) replies to the list, so you'll only send one copy (so you should use a "lists" command in your muttrc, with the name of the mailbox the mailing list gets filtered into). Else "g" (group reply) with reply to all senders (the list and the original oster), which is a bit rude and a waste of bandwidth) Which means that I think reply-to munging by a list is a GODD thing; the idea of the list is public discourse (as a matter of course), so a private reply should *not* be the norm, but something you have to go to extra effort to do. My $ 0.02US. <G> -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project <http://leaf.sourceforge.net> AIM: MikeLeone Public Key - <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc> Registered Linux user# 201348 Boom diddy diddy, Boom diddy do Queen
msg11126/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
