On Wednesday 02 October 2002 10:50, Rossz Vamos-Wentworth wrote:
> I've always considered filtering spam as the last resort.  I prefer
> blocking at the mta if at all possible.  Here's a useful resource:
> http://www.blackholes.us/
>
> Rossz
>
Useful resource?  From the rhetoric on that site, I wouldn't use any of the 
site's data without checking each entry first.  I've been looking at a number 
of RBL sites recently and have reluctantly come to the conclusion that 
objectivity is not high on their list of things to do.  They give the 
appearance of being part of the Megalomaniac's Full Employment Act.


At least here, folks are interested in eliminating false positives as well as 
false negatives.
-- 
+-----------------------+----------------------------------+--------------+
|Robin Lynn Frank       |No attachments or active content  |Copyright and |
|Director of Operations |is permitted in incoming mail.    |PGP/GPG info  |
|Paradigm-Omega, LLC    |Violatons are rejected.  Incoming |in mail or    |
|www.paradigm-omega.com |mail subject to confirmation.     |message header|
+-----------------------+----------------------------------+--------------+


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to