As an ISP with customer that need to communicate worldwide these are far to inclusive to implement on our servers. They would probably be most useful on private SA installs where the scope of email communications is generally pretty narrow and US based. The infrequent exceptions could be adjusted with a couple whitelist entries.
-----Original Message----- From: Simon Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] useful blackholes At 09:50 AM 10/2/02 -0800, Rossz Vamos-Wentworth wrote: >I've always considered filtering spam as the last resort. I prefer >blocking at the mta if at all possible. Here's a useful resource: >http://www.blackholes.us/ Interesting, but one of my company's mailservers is listed in the XO block: 66.237.... (66.236.0.0/14). On that basis and the fact that our IP address does not show up in any other blocking lists, they appear to be taking the view that everyone who uses XO as an ISP is a spammer -- a rather extreme view. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
