Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > Razor isn't that good. Last week sometime, someone was > auto-reporting all messages to exim-users. The listmaster did come up > > with a nice and creative way to identify who the luser was :-). If it > > weren't for things like that I might actually use it.
Indeed. If you've been following razor-users, this was a recently touched nerve. The discussion raised some interesting issues. Among these: 1. Is Razor for filter users to share spam info. with non-filter/Razor users? 2. Or is Razor strictly a tool for sharing info. about filter resistent spam? Part of the auto-reporting issue depends on *what* is doing the auto-reporting. SB, does indeed seem to be pretty strict about what it marks as definite spam - most of what it filters is marked as *blocked*. Determining just what constitutes spam was another interesting point. With SA, you have lots of control over sensitivity. Not so with Razor - so whatever, or whoever reports determines whether you will get a given piece of mail, if you depend on Razor to make the decision. And this could be a big drawback automation or not - though there was mention that this sort of issue was being to be addressed in Razor 2. Bryan -- [Please don't CC (or To ;)) me when list posting] I struggle in vain. My foot slips. My life is still a poet's existence. What could be more unhappy? - (Soren Kierkegaard - Either/Or) (Don't answer that!) Labor exploitation hurts us all - Sign the petition: http://www.zazona.com/h1bpetition/P/facts.html Proud ugly web site owner: http://www.wecs.com/bio_ailinks.htm; http://www.wecs.com/spam.htm http://www.wecs.com/resume.htm _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
