Bryan, et al -- ...and then Bryan Hoover said... % % David T-G wrote: % % > actually report the spammer a la spamcop? % % I'm pretty sure neither report spammers. My guess is, ISPs that care do
OK; that lines up with my understanding. That's why I still have a spamcop forwarding macro in my mutt config... % a good enough job chasing spamers around. The rest won't listen to % complaints. I imagine, reporting them is, seen in the light of day, is % probably pointless. This is an interesting one, though... I'm sure there are some that won't listen to complaints, though perhaps if enough people complain they might. How, however, are those caring ISPs to chase the spammers around, as you put it, if nobody tells 'em about the problem? Have I missed something, or is this just a "let someone else worry about it" approach? I'm truly curious, since I would much rather have the spam go away than just drop it away on my server... % % Bryan % -- % [Please don't CC (or To ;)) me when list posting] You should set your MUA to Reply-To: or Mail-Followup-To: properly :-) TIA & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg06062/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
