On Thu, 02 May 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Craig R Hughes wrote:
>> Yes, see bugzilla #18 which I merged into #130. This is the major
>> piece of stuff I'd like to get done for 2.30 -- and I'm actually
>> quite motivated to do the coding myself; I have a couple of other
>> things I'm probably going to be working on, but might well have 130
>> done by month end.
> 
> I'm thinking of doing this this week, so let me know if you want me to
> hold off.
> 
> I've also got some mail parsing code you may be interested in rather
> than using MIME-tools, or whatever the plan was. It's pretty sweet
> code based on some stuff I wrote a couple of years ago now. I've been
> running it over some large archives and it does pretty well. 

Cool. Does it correctly handle cases such as MIME digest messages
containing nested multipart/related and multipart/alternative content?

Also, will it handle a MIME part separator such as...

--terrorist-Marxist-counter-intelligence-security-PLO-arrangements

...a separator that I know has caused some email parsing tools to fail
and die in the past. Oh, and spaces in MIME breaks?

Not that MIME-tools necessarily are better, mind you, it's more that I
have seen Gnus (my mail reader) go through the world of obscure MIME
breakage when trying to parse mime correctly. :)

        Daniel

-- 
Here with a Newsgroup, where we talk of Quoste,
  A Cup of Coffee and a Slice of Toast;  
    The Bits flow Eastward in the Packet Stream:
  Who is the Poster, pray, and who the Post? 
        -- Omar Kyahham

_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to