Yes, see bugzilla #18 which I merged into #130.  This is the major piece of
stuff I'd like to get done for 2.30 -- and I'm actually quite motivated to do
the coding myself; I have a couple of other things I'm probably going to be
working on, but might well have 130 done by month end.

C

Ken Causey wrote:

KC> I've just recently setup SA for an ISP customer of mine and crazily
KC> enough they are getting complaints from their customers that want the
KC> spam to be tagged but they also want to be able to look at it.  The
KC> problem is with crazy HTML spam and Base64 encoded stuff.  When the SA
KC> info is prepended to the message mail clients don't render the message
KC> anymore.  Has there ever been consideration of making the original
KC> message body a MIME part of the message where the SA comments are the
KC> main body?  This way in most MUAs the user could double click on the
KC> attached message to view it and the MUA would render it correctly.
KC>
KC> Ken Causey
KC>
KC>
KC>
KC>
KC> _______________________________________________________________
KC>
KC> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
KC> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KC> _______________________________________________
KC> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
KC> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KC> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
KC>
KC>
KC>


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to