Great! That would be excellent. I'm making due for now with putting the info in the headers.
Ken On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 16:56, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Yes, see bugzilla #18 which I merged into #130. This is the major piece of > stuff I'd like to get done for 2.30 -- and I'm actually quite motivated to do > the coding myself; I have a couple of other things I'm probably going to be > working on, but might well have 130 done by month end. > > C > > Ken Causey wrote: > > KC> I've just recently setup SA for an ISP customer of mine and crazily > KC> enough they are getting complaints from their customers that want the > KC> spam to be tagged but they also want to be able to look at it. The > KC> problem is with crazy HTML spam and Base64 encoded stuff. When the SA > KC> info is prepended to the message mail clients don't render the message > KC> anymore. Has there ever been consideration of making the original > KC> message body a MIME part of the message where the SA comments are the > KC> main body? This way in most MUAs the user could double click on the > KC> attached message to view it and the MUA would render it correctly. > KC> > KC> Ken Causey > KC> > KC> > KC> > KC> > KC> _______________________________________________________________ > KC> > KC> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > KC> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > KC> _______________________________________________ > KC> Spamassassin-talk mailing list > KC> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > KC> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > KC> > KC> > KC> > _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
