Sidney Markowitz wrote: SM> Personally I simply disable all network checks by using the -L option to spamassassin SM> and spamd. I don't see enough benefit from the network checks, they cause a scan of SM> one email to take seconds instead of a fraction of a second, and there are too many SM> false positives. In this case I consider turning it off to be a solution to the SM> problem.
I agree with most of this, and myself run with -L. However, the seconds sentence overstates the problem slightly. Doing the network tests is a parallel problem, so while each individual message might take a second, it's not stopping other messages from being processed at the same time; since your machine is going to be waiting on network IO for most of that second, it shouldn't impact performance of the server much at all, except that it will slightly increase your memory requirements, since more messages are likely to be in memory at a time. C _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
