On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:10:15AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Duncan Findlay wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:52:44AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > >>Craig Hughes wrote: > >> > >>>Well, one issue is that rules are sometimes evals, with corresponding > >>>updates to Mail::Spamassassin::EvalTests > >> > >>Then EvalTests should move from being a .pm module to being another .rc > >>file that gets evalled as part of the compilation stage. > >> > > > > > >should or could? > > Should. I can't think of any reason the eval tests *need* to be in a .pm > file, aside from the nice compilation testing and syntax highlighting > that gives the developers. But that could be achieved with a better test > suite (which I'm working on). > > Though perhaps it needs some checks to say that "User rules can't be > eval rules" or something like that. But I think that's another bug > altogether anyway. >
I'm just wondering if this might cause some security issues or some performance issues. -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
