I'd say the one plausible advantage Brightmail might have is that since they're in at Hotmail and other large installations, they could implement systems that notice that 45,000 people all just received the same message, making it likely that those messages are spam.
Their rules and scoring are I'd say inferior to SA though. And there's no real way to expose configuration stuff to users with BrightMail. C Duncan Findlay wrote: > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:35:11 -0500 > From: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right) > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:35:28PM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 March 2002 01:47 am, you wrote: > > > > > We're a £100m company (an ISP, and yes we're growing, not struggling), > > > and SA is at the very heart of our anti-spam technology. Trust me - we > > > would not let SA go away. > > > > That's a relief. > > > > Also, thanks for supporting an open-source project like SA, rather than > > developing something proprietary in an attempt to get one-up on your > > competitors. > > > > My question is why would any company use brightmail? Is it actually that > much superior to spamassassin? > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
