Craig Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I won't bother getting too deep into this topic, but it works great
> for me.  

Yes, that's the funny part.  It's a hard topic (and an off topic here)
to get into.  

So, I'll just clarify a couple things and then let whoever wants to
have the last word.

> Had one pretty messy FS crash once, but reiser-tools fixed it up
> reasonably well (got back all the files I didn't have on tape yet
> anyway).

This doesn't sound too good.  In years of using ext2 I can't actually
remember losing data.  We lost data on several machines in 9 months of
running reiser.

> ext3 will have the same directory-list performance as ext2, which is
> what the original topic was.

No doubt you are right that I was getting into a different subject.  I
*only* brought up our experience because I would not recommend reiser
to anyone right now.  We too got sucked in because of performance
promises, and to be sure it is performant, but data lose is
unacceptable.

Another person said that we must have had kernel problems.  I know
this is the standard cry from the reiser guys, but without belaboring
this point too much, we have a lot of experience not only in properly
configuring kernels, but in driver development and kernel
instrumentations.  I have fairly high confidence that we were doing
what we were supposed to and, therefore, grave concerns about the
reiserfs.  In retrospect it seems more clear to me that we should have
taken the fact that they seem to be the only major FS team that
consistently finds problems with both the kernel and commonly deployed
hardware.  Maybe there are kernel problems and maybe there are
hardware problems, but the other FS's manage to keep the data safe
despite that.  It's a telling thing that reiser cannot.

Ok, so that's my last word on the subject (on this forum anyway).

Fire away if you want to correct my grossly naive statements one last
time... :-)

rw2

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to