On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Bob Plankers wrote: > I still think an instant accept would be beneficial, if it is implemented > as a lower threshold or as an outright accept. Certainly there is > some speed to be gained by skipping the processing altogether, but > inititally the lower threshold would be easier to implement. We'd just > need another configuration option then, too. I'll poke at it and see what > we'd get from it.
To be honest there's very little processing time difference between running a few subs that return immediately and not running them at all. At least compared to the rest of the stuff going on. Though of course I'm sure Arpi will disagree with me ;-) -- Matt. <:->get a SMart net</:-> ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
