On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Bob Plankers wrote: > > > Two things: > > > > 1) You didn't implement the whitelist/blacklist outright accept/reject > > concept yet. Bug #62 mentions that in some of Craig's notes, so if that's > > still of interest then someone should create a new "bug" for it. > > Yeah, I'd prefer that as a separate entry, if that's OK.
Actually I don't think this will be an issue any more. If the stop_at_threshold is enabled, each sub will enter and immediately exit, meaning the result is the same as Craig suggested. Except there's no outright "accept" enabled. Just reject. I don't think this is too much of an issue though, and presumably we could add an optional lower (non-spam) threshold too. -- Matt. <:->get a SMart net</:-> ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
