I still think an instant accept would be beneficial, if it is implemented as a lower threshold or as an outright accept. Certainly there is some speed to be gained by skipping the processing altogether, but inititally the lower threshold would be easier to implement. We'd just need another configuration option then, too. I'll poke at it and see what we'd get from it.
...Bob > Actually I don't think this will be an issue any more. If the > stop_at_threshold is enabled, each sub will enter and immediately exit, > meaning the result is the same as Craig suggested. Except there's no > outright "accept" enabled. Just reject. I don't think this is too much of > an issue though, and presumably we could add an optional lower (non-spam) > threshold too. > > -- > Matt. > <:->get a SMart net</:-> > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ > ...................................................................... Bob Plankers [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Wisconsin - Madison +1.608.262.7783 Division of Information Technology http://bob.plankers.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
