On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Bob Plankers wrote: > Two things: > > 1) You didn't implement the whitelist/blacklist outright accept/reject > concept yet. Bug #62 mentions that in some of Craig's notes, so if that's > still of interest then someone should create a new "bug" for it.
Yeah, I'd prefer that as a separate entry, if that's OK. > 2) Spamd needs an update to reflect the short-circuiting. Attached is a > patch. Oops, I patched spamd, not spamd.raw, and just assumed it was checked in. D'oh! (my patch included docs though :-P) > Otherwise, cool. I did some informal beating on it with the patched spamd > and a mix of 1000 messages from my INBOX, 2/3 non-spam and 1/3 spam, and > it consistently shaves a few seconds off. Running with no AWL, no user > configs, and the short-circuiting got it to 8.7 messages per second, fed > serially via formail on a generic 1.4 GHz Athlon box. Groovy! -- Matt. <:->get a SMart net</:-> ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
