> The spam-phrase code weights the scores of phrases by the length of the > message, in other words, it's not the occurrence of spam phrases, but rather > the density of spam phrases that's important. Since "for your" consititutes > a large percentage of such a short message, it's getting scored really high. > I suspect that probably the algorithm would be a lot less sensitive to > false-positives if it had a "maximum density" compensator for short > messages. I'll take a look at it if you file a bugzilla report at > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
OK, submitted as bug # 22. Thanks! -- michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ "Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
