On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:53:09PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:42:30PM +0100, Olivier M. wrote:
| > Now a little suggestion (but maybe it's already corrected):
| > I have messages which are travelling twice on the server,
| > and it's then scanned twice, so spams are getting two or event
| > three *****SPAM***** in their Subject. Shouldn't SA check if
| > there is already a "X-Spam-Flag" line in the headers, and
| > skip the mail if it's the case ? :)
|
| How does SA know that it has done the scanning before? If a message gets
| sent to me that was scanned with someone else's config, I want it rescanned
| with my config.
|
| It would also allow spammers to DoS SA by adding a "X-Spam-Status: no" header
| to all their spams.
Not quite -- the suggestion was to look for the "X-Spam-Flag: yes"
header. I don't think any spammer will add that, but if they do it
works out nicely for the rest of us (since that is the trigger for
junking the message) :-).
-D
--
THe lot is cast into the lap,
but its every decision is from the Lord.
Proverbs 16:33
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
