Hi Mike - Have you tried using CS in a nasal sprayer several times a day? Just a thought since that helps my allergy/sinus headaches tremendously, it might possibly help yours.
Hope ya feel better!! Ruth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Monett" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: Re: CS>Re: $$$ perpectives > url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60083.html > Re: CS>Re: $$$ perpectives > From: Robert Berger > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:04:37 > > Hi Robert, > > Please do not think I am trying to attack you. It is my nature to > question and look for explanations why things work they way they do. This > has resulted in 6 US patents that have helped the industry I work in a > great deal. You can see a list of the patents at > > http://www3.sympatico.ca/add.automation/patents.htm > > The other thing is I suffer terrible headaches from mold sensitivity. > Some have remarked that it makes me sound arrogant - that is not my > intention. It is only a reflection of the excruciating pain I suffer > constantly. The only thing that seems to reduce the pain is to try to > help others. > > Please forgive me if my wording is not as smooth as I would like, or I > am unable to adequate consideration to everyones feelings. I will fix it. > Somehow, I will figure out how to eliminate the effects of mold in my > body. But I don't know how... > > In the meantime, I am very interested to figure out why these methods > give such different results. In principle, they should agree within > experimental error. > > > Mike, > > > I have cross checked my spect and procedures with four other > > people and the results are accurate. I have used 16 boxes of Hach > > chemicals with 50 tests per box, that makes over 800 tests !!!! I > > can look at the color of the test sample and guess the > > concentration to within +/- 3 ppm. Every test has a blank prepared > > from the sample taken from the is to be measured. > > It's not my calculation. It's Bob Lee's, and it places an upper bound on > the concentration of silver ions in solution. It is a good sanity check > on other methods of measuring the concentration. Meaurements that > indicate a higher concentration must be in error. > > Trem indicated the method compares favorably with his measurements: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ur l: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m7204.html > Re: CS>basic electrochemistry theory computes maximum ppm. > From: Trem Williams > Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 10:09:31 > > Bill and for those who are interested, > > It's interesting that your calculations bear out our results > fairly closely. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > It's good to confirm your results with others, but if they are using the > same method, they may have similar unknown problems. This has been known > to happen. > > You need to check the results using a completely different technology. > How do the readings compare with the Hanna PWT? And how do you calibrate > the Hanna? All these methods are a good cross-check, and should agree > with each other. > > The salt test never goes out of calibration. One silver ion mates with > one chlorine ion to make one atom of silver chloride. The reflection and > transmission characteristics of water change according to the > concentration. > > This might be a good cross-check on the Hanna PWT and other methods of > measuring ion concentration. > > It's worth considering. > > Best Regards, > > Mike Monett > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >
