url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60083.html Re: CS>Re: $$$ perpectives From: Robert Berger Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:04:37
Hi Robert, Please do not think I am trying to attack you. It is my nature to question and look for explanations why things work they way they do. This has resulted in 6 US patents that have helped the industry I work in a great deal. You can see a list of the patents at http://www3.sympatico.ca/add.automation/patents.htm The other thing is I suffer terrible headaches from mold sensitivity. Some have remarked that it makes me sound arrogant - that is not my intention. It is only a reflection of the excruciating pain I suffer constantly. The only thing that seems to reduce the pain is to try to help others. Please forgive me if my wording is not as smooth as I would like, or I am unable to adequate consideration to everyones feelings. I will fix it. Somehow, I will figure out how to eliminate the effects of mold in my body. But I don't know how... In the meantime, I am very interested to figure out why these methods give such different results. In principle, they should agree within experimental error. > Mike, > I have cross checked my spect and procedures with four other > people and the results are accurate. I have used 16 boxes of Hach > chemicals with 50 tests per box, that makes over 800 tests !!!! I > can look at the color of the test sample and guess the > concentration to within +/- 3 ppm. Every test has a blank prepared > from the sample taken from the is to be measured. It's not my calculation. It's Bob Lee's, and it places an upper bound on the concentration of silver ions in solution. It is a good sanity check on other methods of measuring the concentration. Meaurements that indicate a higher concentration must be in error. Trem indicated the method compares favorably with his measurements: ------------------------------------------------------------------------url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m7204.html Re: CS>basic electrochemistry theory computes maximum ppm. From: Trem Williams Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 10:09:31 Bill and for those who are interested, It's interesting that your calculations bear out our results fairly closely. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ It's good to confirm your results with others, but if they are using the same method, they may have similar unknown problems. This has been known to happen. You need to check the results using a completely different technology. How do the readings compare with the Hanna PWT? And how do you calibrate the Hanna? All these methods are a good cross-check, and should agree with each other. The salt test never goes out of calibration. One silver ion mates with one chlorine ion to make one atom of silver chloride. The reflection and transmission characteristics of water change according to the concentration. This might be a good cross-check on the Hanna PWT and other methods of measuring ion concentration. It's worth considering. Best Regards, Mike Monett -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
