serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v10] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v10] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v10] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Integrated: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) David Simms
• Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v4] Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382392: Mixed jstack does not work on Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows duke
  • Integrated: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v39] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v28] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] duke
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v38] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8374364: TestCgroupMetrics.java fails when cpuset unmounted [v13] SendaoYan
• Integrated: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests Shiv Shah
• Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows duke
• RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v6] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Integrated: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
• Withdrawn: 8361099: Shenandoah: Improve heap lock contention by using CAS for memory allocation Xiaolong Peng
• Integrated: 8383881: Cleanup cpu feature enums and test functions for features that should always be available on x86-64 platforms Ashutosh Mehra
• Re: RFR: 8383881: Cleanup cpu feature enums and test functions for features that should always be available on x86-64 platforms [v4] Ashutosh Mehra
• RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper duke
  • Integrated: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
• RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v13] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Rémi Forax
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Withdrawn: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections duke
• RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v2] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v3] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v4] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v5] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v6] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v6] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v6] Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v6] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Integrated: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` Axel Boldt-Christmas
• Integrated: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 Anton Artemov
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Cleanup cpu feature enums and test functions for features that should always be available on x86-64 platforms [v11] Ashutosh Mehra
• RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD [v2] Leonid Mesnik

• Earlier messages
• Later messages