On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 07:59:45 GMT, Albert Mingkun Yang <ay...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> but OOM and heap dump have to be, in a sense of atomic >> >> I see; it can indeed be annoying that heap-dump doesn't capture the intended >> snapshot -- a java thread can trigger a gc that changes heap-content. >> However, AFAICS, fixing that non-atomic issue requires updating callers of >> `report_java_out_of_memory`. Therefore, I am inclined to think it should be >> addressed in its own ticket. It's a preexisting issue on master as well, not >> sth newly introduced by this PR. > > Does https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347833 match the problem you have > in mind? Yes. Sounds good. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25000#discussion_r2190117730
