On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 19:37:17 GMT, Harald Eilertsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> If that's acceptable to the project, I think that it would be a good idea > long term. In If those are your plans with os/bsd, I think before doing these changes to SA you should also hash out and get buy-in for the proposed changes to os/bsd. The SA changes are somewhat disruptive and need to be well thought out before we proceed. > In the short term, we're just trying to get the port working with as little > disruption to upstream as possible. What would be the least disruptive would be to directly fix the existing BSD port without the proposed restructuring. Any idea why the recent changes broke the BSD port and how hard (and possibly disruptive) it would be to fix. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29003#issuecomment-3725518735
