serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v41] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8375076: two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375076: Two JDI scenario tests are failing with out of wait time after completing successfully David Holmes
• RFR: 8375062: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java fails to output debuggee prompt after cont cmd Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8375062: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java fails to output debuggee prompt after cont cmd David Holmes
• RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385345: AWT and ImageIO shell tests fail when run using MSys/MinGW Phil Race
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v6] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v6] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v6] Thomas Stuefe
• RFR: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8384958: Regression of jvmti/init/GetAllStackTraces/getallstktr001.java caused by JDK-8382273 Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v5] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v31] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v32] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8385165: [ubsan] TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java jtreg test fails with ubsan-enabled binaries Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v4] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v3] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v30] Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8385136: SA cannot unwind the native frame which does not have DWARF Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v40] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v29] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
• RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
• RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
• RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows duke
  • Integrated: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v39] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v28] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v38] Jatin Bhateja
• Integrated: 8317124: use reproducible random in HotSpot tests Shiv Shah
• Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v6] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
• Withdrawn: 8361099: Shenandoah: Improve heap lock contention by using CAS for memory allocation Xiaolong Peng
• Integrated: 8383881: Cleanup cpu feature enums and test functions for features that should always be available on x86-64 platforms Ashutosh Mehra
• Re: RFR: 8383881: Cleanup cpu feature enums and test functions for features that should always be available on x86-64 platforms [v4] Ashutosh Mehra
• RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper duke
  • Integrated: 8382273: Update nsk/jvmti/unit tests to use ThreadWrapper Shiv Shah
• RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8330363: JDI ThreadDeathEvent/thread/thread001 timed out with UT enabled Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v13] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v2] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v3] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8383421: ZGC: Problematic interactions between `JVMTI_EVENT_SAMPLED_OBJECT_ALLOC` and `clone` [v4] Axel Boldt-Christmas
• Integrated: 8380080: PopFrame logic assumes trailing member name arg is recoverable as local 0 Anton Artemov
• Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8334403: Unify behavior of os::committed_in_range across OSes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Remove checks for sse and sse2 on x86-64 [v11] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8383881: Cleanup cpu feature enums and test functions for features that should always be available on x86-64 platforms [v11] Ashutosh Mehra
• RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373645: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/events/EM02/em02t003/TestDescription.java failed: Unexpected event JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD Serguei Spitsyn

• Earlier messages