On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 05:10:42 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This is the 3rd PR for [JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & 
>> Linking](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315737).
>> 
>> **Overview**
>> 
>> - A new `-XX:+AOTClassLinking` flag is added. See [JEP 
>> 498](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315737) and the 
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339506) for a discussion of this 
>> command-line option, its default value, and its impact on compatibility.
>> - When this flag is enabled during the creation of an AOT cache (aka CDS 
>> archive), an `AOTLinkedClassTable` is added to the cache to include all 
>> classes that are AOT-linked. For this PR, only classes for the 
>> boot/platform/application loaders are eligible. The main logic is in 
>> `aotClassLinker.cpp`.
>> - When an AOT archive is loaded in a production run, all classes in the 
>> `AOTLinkedClassTable` are loaded into their respective class loaders at the 
>> earliest opportunity. The main logic is in `aotLinkedClassBulkLoader.cpp`.
>>   - The boot classes are loaded as part of `vmClasses::resolve_all()`
>>   - The platform/application classes are loaded after the module graph is 
>> restored (see changes in `threads.cpp`).
>> - Since all classes in a `AOTLinkedClassTable` are loaded before any 
>> user-code is executed, we can resolve constant pool entries that refer to 
>> these classes during AOT cache creation. See changes in 
>> `AOTConstantPoolResolver::is_class_resolution_deterministic()`.
>> 
>> **All-or-nothing Loading**
>> 
>> - Because AOT-linked classes can refer to each other, using direct C++ 
>> pointers, all AOT-linked classes must be loaded together. Otherwise we will 
>> have dangling C++ pointers in the class metadata structures. 
>> - During a production run, we check during VM start-up for incompatible VM 
>> options that would prevent some of the AOT-linked classes from being loaded. 
>> For example:
>>   - If the VM is started with an JVMTI agent that has ClassFileLoadHook 
>> capabilities, it could replace some of the AOT-linked classes with 
>> alternative versions.
>>   - If the VM is started with certain module options, such as 
>> `--patch-module` or `--module`, some AOT-linked classes may be replaced with 
>> patched versions, or may become invisible and cannot be loaded into the JVM.
>> - When incompatible VM options are detected, the JVM will refuse to load an 
>> AOT cache that has AOT-linked classes. See 
>> `FileMapInfo::validate_aot_class_linking()`.
>>   - For simplfication, `FileMapInfo::validate_aot_class_linking()` requires 
>> `CDSConfig::is_using_full_module_graph()` to be true. This means that the 
>> exa...
>
> src/hotspot/share/cds/archiveUtils.cpp line 390:
> 
>> 388:         return "boot"; // boot classes in java.base
>> 389:       } else {
>> 390:         return "boot2"; // boot classes outside of java.base
> 
> Suggestion: boot -> boot-base, boot2 -> boot-nonbase ?

I prefer boot/boot2 to make the output easier to read. Anyone debugging this 
output will need to read the code to understand what "boot2" or "boot-nonbase" 
is. A few extra characters here will not help.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20843#discussion_r1747824950

Reply via email to