mples:
>
> (1) http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=zfs_ext4_btrfs&num=1
My little few yen in this massacre: Phoronix usually compares apples
with oranges and pigs with candies. So be careful.
> Disclaimer: I use Reiser4
A "Killer FS"™. :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Th
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Linder, Doug
wrote:
> Hint: enterprise-class support != consumer-class support.
> You buy consumer hardware, you pay consumer prices,
> you get consumer support.
+1
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends
> acceptable in farms, where some number of failed systems is acceptable.
>
>
+1.
The only thing that SuperMicro is not what you hurry to call
"commodity": http://www.supermicro.com/products/nfo/files/SAS2/SAS2_1004.pdf
— these boxes works just fine. YMMV though.
Cheers.
--
Ki
om
especially IBM that is not even a real IBM, but a third-party company,
or HP or Dell or especially Sun, which has even much more quirks and
hassles around than SuperMicro support.
Besides, before you post a nonsenses here rudely insulting people, do
some little homework by trying googling nex
quot; — I
meant that BSD and Linux lacks of lots of things that Solaris can do.
And, yes, net_privaddr allows you to run anything below 1000 port from
true non-root. :)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
__
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Frank Cusack
wrote:
> Um, there's plenty of things Solaris can do that Linux and FreeBSD can't
> do, but non-root privileged ports is not one of them.
Unfortunately, yes... :(
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarel
problems that we have with HP or Dell or Sun or IBM
boxes.
So could you please elaborate your statements? I would appreciate that
(and some other folks here as well would be interested to listen to
your lesson).
Thank you.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely en
estion
about Snow Leopard serial number correctness quince.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ested in hearing any more of the whining about
> how terrible things are. However, if you want to work on a positive
> solution, contact me out of band and I'll talk with you more.
As long as Oracle will restore OpenSolaris almost dead community.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are
e called "Super Nexenta Version 134".
:-)
Currently from what I see, I think Nexenta will also die eventually.
Because of BTRFS for Linux, Linux's popularity itself and also thanks
to the Oracle's help. Sorry telling this to you, working @nexenta.com
though... You, guys, are doing
oblem. Do I need such "support"? No. Not
at all.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
s) won't build
stuff for Larry just for free. We need OS back opened in reward. So I
think OpenSolaris is pretty much game over, thanks to the Oracle. Some
Oracle fanboys might call it a plain FUD, hope to get updates etc, but
the reality is that Oracle to OpenSolaris is pretty much the same wha
n pure list price costs $3,962, one
year warranty. And now identical Supermicro 6016T-TF with exactly the
same config/warranty for the full price what I have to pull out my
wallet is $2,190 — which is mostly as twice as cheaper. I think red
Oracle logo label (or blue Sun's) must cost th
I
installed the thing from USB stick. After that everything is OK.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ogy (which would be great if that would
happen).
I wish I am wrong, but looks to me pretty much game over, folks:
Oracle appeared to be complete idiots towards the community. Same probably
will happen to Java.
:-(
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that
, the others will continue to
function. Impact: a little performance losing, some time needs to warm
them up and sort things out. No serious consequences or data loss
here.
Take care, folks.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
_
and thus just shaking an air with no meaning behind.
Take care.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:24 AM, BM wrote:
> EFI is a label, that differs from the VTOC mainly by supporting larger
> than 2GB disks (exceptions are SCSI and SSD drives)
I mean, TB. :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up
nical challenge to
FreeBSD community when nobody has any idea when things is gonna be
done/released there anyway), but you might contact Rui Paulo (rpaulo@)
on this topic.
Although I don't know how things are moving forward in order to
support ZFS on Windows. :-)
Take care.
--
Kind regards, BM
19 matches
Mail list logo
