subscribe to wave-dev-digest, and I think you'll get what you want (i.e.
mail wave-dev-digest-subscr...@incubator.apache.org).
Upayavira
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:39 +, "Gray Simpson"
wrote:
> I've just unsubscribed again - The old Google Group mailing list allowed
>
You could look at some of the other sites that interface to our lists.
Nabble, or markmail.org, for example.
Upayavira
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:13 -0700, "Mike Mabey" wrote:
> I don't know how many other people subscribe to the list as a digest, but
> I
> must say that
you cannot delete someone's post, but I believe
you can in a wave - how do we make sure no-one goes and deletes bits of
history they find undesirable?)
It is a discussion I am expecting to happen during the life and
incubation of this project!
Upayavira
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:21 +0100, "T
I agree, we should get some done soon. Are there any more we can get
done quickly? If Andrus isn't able to send in an account request over
the next few days, I'll happily do it. Andrus?
Upayavira
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:55 -0800, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
> What is the t
,
Upayavira (who will now go try work out why reminders weren't sent)
Looks good - can you add it to the wiki page?
Thanks for a speedy response.
Upayavira
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:40 +1100, "Alex North" wrote:
> Eek. Ok, let me try:
>
> Wave
>
> Wave a real-time communication and collaboration tool
>
> Wave entered incubation o
x27;ll get the space created soon. If you decide to ditch history, you can
then do the rest yourself. If you find a way to preserve history, I can
arrange an import.
Upayavira
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:18 -0800, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
> It seems like all of the tools are focused
frastructure mailing list whether anyone knows
of HG->SVN conversion techniques.
Upayavira
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:07 +, "Upayavira" wrote:
> I am happy to help with getting SVN set up.
>
> These are the stages that it requires, as far as I see:
>
> * svn mkdir
It has been suggested that you can do HG to SVN via:
hg -> git-fast-import -> svn
Does that help you?
Upayavira
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:00 +0000, "Upayavira" wrote:
> I've done the authz grants. I could find accounts for everyone except
> Joseph Gentle and Lenn
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:08 +, "Upayavira" wrote:
> It has been suggested that you can do HG to SVN via:
>
> hg -> git-fast-import -> svn
The other place suggested to ask is on users@subversion.a.o.
Upayavira
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:00 +, "Upayavira
hat (account request phase) please tell me your
preferred forwarding email address and your preferred user account ID.
Upayavira
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:00, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > I've done the authz grants. I could find accounts for everyone except
> > Joseph
Are you referring to the welcome message for this list?
I have the ability to edit that. If there's a simple message we want
adding, let me know.
We'll just need to check any changes survive list maintenance, e.g.
eventual graduation.
Upayavira
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 04:36 +1100, &qu
Actually, we still have two committers without accounts. I'll update the
report and then sign it.
Upayavira
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:21 -0500, "Andrus Adamchik"
wrote:
> Looks great. One comment - since this is Wave's first report, we should
> probably include all the i
'tis done now :-)
Upayavira
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:39 -0700, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
> All,
>
> I am actually being useful this week. I have created the basic site
> layout in SVN. It is located here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/
Apache is involved. See here [1].
I do believe incubator projects are allowed to participate, but I'd like
to see us having moved our source into SVN before that!
Upayavira
[1] http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:47 +0100, "Lennard de Rijk"
wrote:
&g
d restrict its use more widely to describe other things than Apache
Wave (i.e. allowed by copyright law, prevented by trademark law).
Upayavira
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:11 +, "Paul Thomas"
wrote:
> Apache's Licence
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>
&
g them somewhere and posting a URL here.
Upayavira
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:53 +0100, "Jérémy Naegel"
wrote:
Hi,
Since the Wave Federation Protocol is open-source from
the beginning, I'm amazed that the Wave Protocol logo doesn't
have an open-source friendly licence!
How did
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:26 -0600, "Juan Antonio Osorio"
wrote:
> uhmso... does Wave apply thanks to Apache if someone wants to get
> involved from GSoC?
Yes, Wave can take on GSoC projects. Do you have an idea?
Upayavira
high to me (although there's no real reason why I should know
what I am talking about...)
So if committers have projects, they should be ready to start writing
them down soon.
Regards, Upayavira
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:45 +0200, "Yuri Zelikov"
wrote:
> I am not sure, but as far as
lugin.
Upayavira
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:55 +0200, "Jérémy Naegel"
wrote:
> One little thing about the http://incubator.apache.org/wave/ website: it
> links the Dev Wiki to https://cwiki.apache.org/WAVE/ while I think it
> should
> instead link to https://cwiki.apache.org/co
A bit late now, but I think we don't need to report this month, as our
initial three months reporting is over already.
I removed us from the monthly reporting schedule last week, we now need
to report every quarter, and the reminders should trigger appropriately.
Upayavira
On Sat, 16 Apr
Fantastic. This is a significant step forwards in the project's
incubation. SVN next :-)
Upayavira
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:36 -0700, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
> All,
>
> Wave's Jira instance is now live. The issues have been imported. At
> this point we sho
If folks let me know their Jira ID, I should be able to do the
necessary.
Upayavira
On Tue, 03 May 2011 16:20 +0300, "Yuri Z" wrote:
> We have lately moved to JIRA to track WIAB issues and this is great.
> However, to fully complete the move we need to have all the active
> c
ons are needs to happen. We
> should look to see what other projects are doing and get some feedback
> from them.
The future of Confluence as a back end to web sites is short, its future
as a Wiki is safe.
Note, there's also MoinMoin wikis too.
Upayavira
has still to
migrate to Apache hardware.
Upayavira
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:00 +1000, "Daniel Danilatos"
wrote:
> Are committers automatically on this wave-commits list?
>
> Στις 11 Μαΐου 2011 6:34 π.μ., ο χρήστης Yuri Z έγραψε:
> > Hi
> > Comments on the Wave J
I would not recommend that. There is no timescale applied to this - it
could be six months, it could be two years, depending upon volunteer
efforts.
Wave should aim to go straight to SVN. If Git is available later, then
maybe a switch can be arranged.
Upayavira
On Mon, 23 May 2011 20:43 +0300
I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have an 'edit'
button too.
Upayavira
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" wrote:
> I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache
> Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my impression wa
if so, in what ways
does it lack?
Upayavira
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:20 -0700, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
> All,
>
> There has been several threads on the usefulness of the current wave web
> site, the lack of consolidated information, and the feasibility of
> maintaining
website tools seemed to dry up
as soon as the CMS turned up. I can only assume that is because it did
*something* right.
I'd encourage you to ask on infrastructure@ about any features you
need/can't find. See if it can get you closer to what you need.
Upayavira
, you have an SVN repo ready to be imported. With a
local svn repo, you can 'fake' users, it doesn't worry about
authentication.
Am I being naive here?
Upayavira
On Sunday, September 04, 2011 7:28 PM, "Yuri Z"
wrote:
> I think that it is technically possible to make cl
duce software, therefore
it must be in control of its main asset, the asset it exists to create!
There's scope to host code on git on Apache infrastructure, but that
requires volunteers to assist with a deployment.
Upayavira
As far as the board report is concerned, the 'most important issues'
should be relating to graduation, so code related stuff isn't so
important (but still interesting).
Upayavira
On Saturday, September 10, 2011 1:16 PM, "Yuri Z"
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I added t
know
isn't the case.
Personally, I'd just add what you've mentioned already, "Continue to
grow the community" below the SVN line, and you'd be there.
The other technical stuff can stay, I just wanted to mitigate that
potential misinterpretation of what you've wri
On Monday, September 12, 2011 1:12 PM, "Jasper Horn"
wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
> > Right, the source code is the project's most valuable possession. The
> > ASF as a charitable organisation exists to produce software, therefore
> > it must be in control of it
Fab, thanks Michael, great to see it done.
Upayavira
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:18 AM, "Michael MacFadden"
wrote:
> All,
>
> After many months our migration from Google Code to the Apache SVN has
> finally been completed. The code can now be checked out at t
The request at this point is for TLP (top level projects) not podlings,
so I'm afraid Wave will have to wait a little while before the git
option comes available. Sorrree :-(
Upayavira
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:43 AM, "Paul Lindner"
wrote:
> Apache Infrastructure is so
There's no harm asking, nor registering an interest, so sure, apply.
Just don't expect it necessarily to happen quickly.
We shall see how the trial proceeds.
Upayavira
On Saturday, December 03, 2011 12:58 PM, "Christian Grobmeier"
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:
In fact, now is the time to show an interest. The question of podlings
using git has been raised on general@incubator, and it would be a good
thing to make the Wave case at this point.
Upayavira
On Monday, December 05, 2011 2:39 PM, "Upayavira"
wrote:
> There's no harm askin
to the
needs of the project, and that you recognise that most people aren't
here to talk about financial issues.
Welcome, I look forward to seeing your contributions to the project!
Regards, Upayavira
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 01:13 AM, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote:
> Hello Christian,
&
described there.
Then, send a link to your site to trademarks at apache.org, and
get them to review it.
Then, make sure that the contributions that you make get into the
Apache SVN tree. If they don't get there, then they're not really
contributions.
Otherwise, a well done site!
Regards,
ative, stating that you want a link on the site, and
is this acceptable?
Upayavira
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012, at 10:43 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> I see. How about submitting the Wave Import code as patch to the Apache
> Wave via the Review Board?
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Kirill Kostyuchenko
ions should now get
through.
Having said that, none of our moderators picked this up - should we add
some more moderators for this list?
Upayavira
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012, at 05:57 PM, Davide Carnovale wrote:
> Thanks Yuri!
> i guess no one did send the email to wave-dev mailing list, at le
ineffective one). We need more. If anyone is prepared to volunteer
(likely requires vetting maybe 10 emails a day) - then let me know and
I'll add you to the roster.
Upayavira
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012, at 09:18 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:03, Upayavira wrote:
&g
I've added the three of you.
See what to do here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#mail-moderate
Upayavira
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012, at 08:32 PM, Lennard de Rijk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 07:14, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > To explain moderation -
> >
> &g
Can we please have a volunteer to write our report?
Needs to be done by the end of the weekend.
Many thanks!
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012, at 01:11 AM, Marvin wrote:
>
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubat
We have discussed these two topics (committers and releases) around the
time of this report, but did not update the report to note this.
I hope the conversation will continue, and that wave will have more to
report for its next report.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012, at 01:32 PM, Ross Gardler
and subversion is now http://subversion.apache.org.
Upayavira
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Fixed. Thanks
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Brandon M. Sergent <
> brandon.serg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > https://incubator.apache.org/**
Wave folks,
We're overdue with our three-monthly incubator/board report, it was due
last Wednesday (6 Sept).
Do we have a volunteer to write one, and soon?
Remember, it should be focused on what Wave needs to do to graduate,
rather than on technical matters.
Thanks,
Upayavira
dered mature enough for a
useful release, however, the community is discussing what is required to
make one, both to better understand the licensing status of our
codebase, and as a means to draw in additional developers and thus speed
up development."
Upayavira
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012, at 10:02
it isn't complete, as it may help
draw in additional developers to help fill in the missing features.
Thoughts?
Upayavira
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012, at 08:21 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> I updated the Wiki for Sep 2012 report. Please feel free to add/edit.
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Max
So, are we discussing? We *need* to start discussing this, as we cannot
stay still in the incubator forever.
Any thoughts?
Note, you don't need to be a committer to be a release manager. Maybe
this is your chance to get more involved.
Upayavira
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012, at 01:28 PM, Upay
I think that one is pretty safe - you won't be given an account without
a CLA these days.
Upayavira
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012, at 01:12 AM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Hi Wavers,
> In anticipation of the upcoming alpha release i'm just checking that
> all the people who have committe
Look at a few other projects, e.g. Lucene, and see what they do
regarding tests.
Upayavira
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012, at 09:13 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Angus,
>
> In a source release where the receiver is expected to build the code
> themselves, the tests would be expected to ensure that
technically valid or
useful release. That said, a release that is full of holes might
actually have the counter-intuitive effect of drawing in fresh
developers who want to fix those holes.
Upayavira
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012, at 02:01 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> Is there anything that could
ign a software grant for Wave? I don't recall the terms on which the
code was given to Apache, and we're gonna have to clarify that before we
can decide whether we can remove the Google copyright headers.
Upayavira
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012, at 05:11 PM, Yuri Zelikov wrote:
>
>
> >
Oops, just sent one there... :-)
Let's see if we get something back.
Upayavira
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012, at 09:28 PM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> I've gotten the original documents back from Dan, it seems to was just
> the
> standard CCLA. I plan to write an email to leg
utors).
I'm not sure that that grants us the right to remove the headers, let's
see if we get an answer to that.
Upayavira
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Angus Turner wrote:
> So you've sent one to legal-discuss? (just confirming)
>
>
>
> On 25/09/2012, at 7:3
Or we ask Dan Peterson whether either he can remove them, or Google can
give us permission to remove them ourselves.
Could you do that Angus?
Thx,
Upayavira
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Angus Turner wrote:
>
>
> > On Sept. 21, 2012, 3:54 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> &g
This is great, so go for it now, thanks!
One thing, it is probably worth forwarding this to secretary@a.o and
asking whether he wishes to record this at all.
Upayavira
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012, at 11:38 PM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Hi All,
> Just forwarding this to the list so we have a recor
Where did we get to on preparing a tet release? Have we got licensing
headers in order? Does anything else stand in our way?
Thx,
Upayavira
sign on to #asfinfra on freenode, and ask there, if you can.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012, at 09:10 PM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Seems it is indeed something on the reviewboard side. Anyone know where
> we
> should go with this?
> Thanks
> Angus Turner
> angusisf...@gmail.com
&
Hi Michael,
Thanks for this. Please try to include struggles and issues relating to
graduation, particularly issues around making a release.
Thx!
Upayavira
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012, at 06:24 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> I have the report on my todo list for this weekend.
>
> ~Michael
We could produce a release like this, then maybe folks'll come along and
tell you how crap it is. Great, tell them to improve it!
Reasonable?
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012, at 07:05 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Michael MacFadden
> wrote:
> > Y
Well, sorry for not thinking it through and having said that earlier!
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012, at 07:45 PM, Angus Turner wrote:
> +1
> Sorry for all the confusion guys!
> Thanks
> Angus Turner
> angusisf...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:
't release, likely they won't.
Is that achievable?
Upayavira
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Angus Turner wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have just received an email from the maintainers of libIDN and they
> have
> just released a new version of their library that is now licensed
Great! Thx,
Upayavira
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, at 07:19 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> Yes. That should be our first step. I will add a patch to add the txt
> file and remove the jars.
>
> ~Michael
>
> On Dec 16, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > Em
its level of activity
These are topics that should be discussed amongst the community here,
and mentioned in the board report also.
Upayavira
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> El 14/03/13 14:17, Upayavira escribió:
> > From my perspective, Wave has not added any new committers for quite
> > some time, has yet to make a release, and the level of activity of the
> > current committers
e remit here. I believe they have a google
group for discussing the protocol itself, but not sure how active that
list is.
The Apache Wave project is focused around producing an implementation of
the protocol.
HTH! Upayavira
On Sat, May 25, 2013, at 12:31 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Christian,
&
I'd argue that that's what version control and commit mails are for.
Just commit it. If someone objects, we can revert.
Upayavira
On Tue, May 28, 2013, at 07:58 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically g
any other committer on
the project - if they weren't a committer, they would have to become one
by the same means as anyone else.
So really, it is great to see the sense of vision you bring, but I'm
particularly keen to see new volunteers turn up to help bring your ideas
into reality.
Upayav
7;s no reason why user focused code
(e.g. clients) can't be developed here, it is simply a question of who
is interested in developing such things.
If OpenOffice can succeed at developing user focused code at Apache,
then the Wave project should be able to also.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 07:04 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Upayavira,
>
> You raise a very interesting point with OpenOffice. I note that there is
> an
> openoffice.org Web site to help promote this product. Wave would benefit
> from a similar branded domain. Wave.org is owned
Getting a release out is the #1 task here, helping newcomers have
something to engage with.
Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 08:09 AM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote:
> I agree, IMO efforts should be directed at getting more man power. Sadly,
> ideas are mostly useless if there's no hand
> > > free, convince the public to donate copious amounts of money to the
> > project
> > > (this was attempted by the now-offline fundwiab
> > > <http://www.fundwiab.com/> initiative,
> > > but it only managed to collect maybe 20 hours worth of developer time;
to bring this project the
fresh blood it most definitely needs.
Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 04:26 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> In my humble opinion we need:
>
> 1) A vision and marketing to attract people. It's hard to attract
> coders
> if they don't know wha
nd Maven was to create a greater sense of order, which would make it
easier for new developers to enter the room.
Upayavira
an do to make it happen is to produce an
exceptionally cool and compelling tool that other projects might also
want to use. Then a discussion can start to happen.
Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 07:38 PM, Alfredo Abambres wrote:
> One thing always bothered me (for years), and since I lost my virgin
I agree that it makes sense - I'm just asking for patience. Apache
places certain constraints on how people develop software so as to be
able to make clearer guarantees to its users. It will take some time to
be sure that those guarantees can still be offered without compromise.
Upayavira
O
play', it wouldn't be too hard to arrange a VM for the purpose.
Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 08:32 PM, Dave wrote:
> On 30/05/13 20:09, Upayavira wrote:
> > As a non-developer, I my understanding is that a part of the intention
> > behind Maven was to create a greater sense of order, which would make
> > it easier for new develop
I agree that 1.0 would give the wrong message. Some <1.0 version is
right.
Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 08:49 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> >> Blockers:
> >> What version number should this be? The code is making reference to
> >> waveinabox 0.3. (Was 0.1, 0.2 ever re
And git is an option now.
Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote:
> (uh, I had not read the other new thread, sorry for my redundant email)
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Bruno Gonzalez
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
>
If there were enough impetus, I'd be able to get a test mailing list set
up, it isn't hard. It would be good to not pollute this list with lots
of test emails early on.
Upayavira
On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 02:20 PM, Alfredo Abambres wrote:
> Thanks Christian, Bruno and Yuri for
Anything under 1.0. Could be 0.4.0 if that makes semver fans happier :-)
Upayavira
On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 03:10 PM, John Blossom - Shore Communications
Inc. wrote:
> You can argue it either way, it really comes down to how you want to
> position the new architecture. If Yuri's comfo
http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-volunteer.html
I'm currently trying to get an answer as to whether the resources are
available at present.
What Christian describes above is good stuff, with one addition, that
these hosts are not intended for running critical services. They should
not be used for anything the project *depends* upon.
Upayavira
we need. I
> usually
> hang out on some IRC servers, i'll search their server/room and lurk for
> a
> while, while we discuss the details here :-)
>
> @upayavira: nice, thanks for the effort. the server would definitely not
> be
> running critical service AFAIK, it would b
e are now even closer... ;)
Yay. Get a tarball up on your people.apache.org/~al site, pronto :-)
Upayavira
Just to note, this is one area I can't really help in. I have negligible
experience of release management, so it is good we have Christian on
hand.
Upayavira
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013, at 08:07 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Cool Ali.
> Please let me know about questions. I am willing to
- please give us the benefit and let the process
continue, and both this release will go out, and Wave will be set up to
be able to make future releases much more easily, as all those 't's will
still be crossed.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 08:09 PM, Alfredo Abambres wrote:
> I onl
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 08:34 PM, Alfredo Abambres wrote:
> Upayavira: Thanks for your explanation.
>
> A doubt: if everybody else voted "-1" and you got three "+1" from PMC,
> the
> release would be approved?
I would expect the -1 votes to be properly ev
While a logo might be open source, trademark law will restrict what you
can do with it. It is important to recognise that logos are kind of a
special case in open source.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 02:23 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Copyright is claimed for the logo by Google but the w
yet clear what the shared project is that
would be discussed on the general@ list - what the shared goal would be.
I'd say let's continue the conversations for a while longer, and when
the time comes, I can create the list (I have the necessary karma).
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 08
I was able to connect, but my 3g connection at the time wasn't
sufficient it seems.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 06:40 PM, Alfredo Abambres wrote:
> Thanks to all who joined/participated the Wave:Forward Ep. 1
>
> IMO, it was far better than I expected it to happen for a 1st
fixes?
Thx, Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:23 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> > How about platform@ ?
> > On Jun 5, 2013 4:59 PM, "Upayavira" wrote:
> >
> >> Except, this isn't for users of WIAB
Get coding!
That's the sort of thing that could bridge the email-wave gap and make
Wave much more compelling. You can use it as a mail client before you
reach the point where you have enough contacts on native Wave to
communicate with directly.
Upayavira
coding part of
this project - that's the most important thing in the end. Talk is easy,
actually doing takes more effort.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 02:51 PM, Paulo Pires wrote:
> Please, separate things! Political & management stuff one way,
> development/user support another.
Note, the report should be about community issues not code, so nearly
complete release and increased engagement are the two main issues I'd
mention. The email<->wave stuff could be useful to raise, although I'd
be okay leaving it a while also.
Anyone volunteering?
Upayavira
On
I've 'signed' it as mentor. Thanks all!
Upayavira
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Very good report folks, thanks for filling it so quickly.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > Yuri,
> >
> > T
Yes, let's get a few more reviews here before we forward it. As I said,
I'm gonna abstain from voting because it is not an area of expertise I
have. I may do a review and vote later.
Upayavira
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013, at 09:29 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hey mate, you have missed
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
