On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:57 -0700, "Michael MacFadden" <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > In regards to the current Apache CMS, which we are currently using are: > > No one knows how to use it. No it's not that complicated, and yes we can > learn it. But it's just one more hurdle for new developers. > The wiki language doesn't seem to have the ability to create tables, or > other common HTML type things. You have to resort to HTML code. > I am not certain how flexible the layout engine is. I am envisioning > wanting to create a developer's guide, which would have a substantially > differently layout than the main site for example. > I am not certain how easy it is to embed rich content like video without > resorting to raw HTML. > At least in Chrome, there are several bugs in the editor itself. > > Granted, I have only really scratched the surface of how the CMS works, > but as a new user, these were some of my first impressions. They could > also be a result of me just not being familiar with the tool.
Fair enough. I haven't really used the Apache CMS, but all I do know is that endless complaints about CMSes and website tools seemed to dry up as soon as the CMS turned up. I can only assume that is because it did *something* right. I'd encourage you to ask on infrastructure@ about any features you need/can't find. See if it can get you closer to what you need. Upayavira
