RE: RE: Problem compiling VNC source code

2002-04-25 Thread #CHONG CHEE SENG#
After the first compilation of the VNC source code, I get these 12 warnings and 1 error: Warnings: C:\My Documents\Masters\VNC\vnc_winsrc\winvnc\d3des.c(182) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'unsigned long ' to 'unsigned char ', possible loss of data C:\My Documents\Masters\VNC\vnc_winsrc\w

RE: RE : winvncdrv & NT4 (was: winvncdrv new version available)

2002-03-05 Thread Jacob Hoover
to recompile it on my machine. Jake -Original Message- From: Tim Senecal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE : winvncdrv & NT4 (was: winvncdrv new version available) On my machine the driver won't even install, w

Re: RE : winvncdrv & NT4 (was: winvncdrv new version available)

2002-03-05 Thread Tim Senecal
On my machine the driver won't even install, what did you do to get it to install? Tim At 12:05 PM 3/5/2002 +, you wrote: >I am also trying to get this VNC driver working on NT4. I have SP6a >(enhanced encryption), and I cannot get the driver to work. > >I noticed that the driver DID instal

Re: RE : winvncdrv new version available

2002-03-04 Thread Tim Senecal
Guys, I have Windows NT sp6a for Intel, and the driver will not install... the website only gives instructions for installation on win2k... what must i do to get it to work on NT sp6a? Tim At 03:22 PM 3/2/2002 +0100, you wrote: >>Does this version only for Windows 2000 ? >It is only tested o

Re: RE : winvncdrv new version available

2002-03-02 Thread De Vos Rudi
>Does this version only for Windows 2000 ? It is only tested on 2000, but video mirroring is supported on XP,2000 and nt4 SP6 >And have you a version for Windows XP or is it the same ? source code is the same, perhaps the driver need to be recompiled for xp >Does this version of vncviewer compatib

RE: RE : Hardware Version of VNC?

2002-02-22 Thread "Beerse, Corné"
> Why does the AXEL brochure specify Unix and Linux servers but > say nothing > about Windows and others? Their product is the vnc graphics terminal, > right? The server that runs on the Unix/Linux box is ordinary > vnc, so it > could just as easily be Windows, no? > > Or do you think they've t

Re: Re[2]: Who Is Connected

2002-02-13 Thread barnowl
Well put. I find that even IT ppl how should know better do very dumb things, sometimes. Mind if I keep a copy around for handling knuckleheaded customers that don't see why they should worry about it. Evan On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:25:54 +1100 "Catelyn Hearne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes,

Re: Re[2]: Who Is Connected

2002-02-12 Thread Catelyn Hearne
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. However, I have worked with numerous "silly" people who later question why their respective machines were broken into and tampered with, and eventually turned over to "the dark side". If VNC is to be used, suitable passwording is an absolute, along side the securin

RE: Re[2]: Who is connected

2002-02-11 Thread Andrew Cornish
Paul, Thank you Andrewc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Gleave Sent: 11 February 2002 11:21 To: Andrew Cornish Subject: Re[2]: Who is connected http://people.we.mediaone.net/ddyer/znc/zvnc.html On Monday, 11 February 2002, you wr

Re: Re: Connecting to multiple servers on one network

2002-01-26 Thread Alex Angelopoulos
A couple notes on similar things I've done... (1) "Chaining" with VNC is a dog as Wayne notes - you'd want at least ISDN speeds and you won't be happy. (2) Netgears will allow forwarding, but you are typically limited to a total of 8 ports. (3) You *have* to have the 59xx port even with the Jav

RE: Re: Tight 1.2.2: big slowdown?

2002-01-25 Thread Fisher, Dave
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: Tight 1.2.2: big slowdown? > Have you checked to see if any of the encoding option defaults are > different? Turning up compression too far can cause overhead that slows > things down, for example. The client is run with the exact same command line, requestin

Re: Re: Tight 1.2.2: big slowdown?

2002-01-24 Thread Frank Evan Perdicaro
> Have you checked to see if any of the encoding option defaults are > different? Turning up compression too far can cause overhead that slows > things down, for example. The client is run with the exact same command line, requesting maximum compression, minimum fidelty, and minimum color space.

Re: Re: New tech from Micro$oft

2002-01-14 Thread Dave Warren
> "Putting the PR into proprietary." :-) Mind if I steal that for a .sig? -- The nice thing about standards, there is enough for everyone to have their own. - To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe v

Re: Re: New tech from Micro$oft

2002-01-14 Thread Richard Harris
> You mean eXPerience.. And eXPensive "Putting the PR into proprietary." :-) Later, Richard - Richard Harris Environment IT, NCC Ext 4509 - - To unsubscribe,

Re: Re: very strange speed problem with vnc 332r6 win32

2002-01-12 Thread Joerg Riether
Hi Ryan und all members of vnc-list, suggested you are right, what do you suggest me to do (why does this fragmentation occur and what can i do about that) ? the very best regards Jvrg [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 11.01.02: > possible mtu size causing fragmentation? > > Ryan Cayton > Technica

Re: Re: vnc w/ 4port Linksys DSL router

2002-01-06 Thread rh . ccm
Thank you, Michael. That was most helpful. I will try your suggestions and see how it goes, hopefully early this week. Randy ___ > > Question 1: I understand that I have to set port forwarding on the dsl > > router setup to port 5900 (or 59x

RE : RE : RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "E x it". . .

2001-11-14 Thread Jean-Pierre.Verheecke
Net stop winvnc/Net Start Winvnc are not running on Windows 98 Se but only on WindowsNT/2000 -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyi : mercredi 14 novembre 2001 17:20 @ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: RE : RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server

RE: RE : RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Ex it". . .

2001-11-14 Thread Matthew . van . Eerde
What about: upgrade.bat (must be run as administrator) net stop winvnc winvnc -remove winvnc_new -install net start winvnc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 08:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE : RE : RE

RE : RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit". . .

2001-11-14 Thread Jean-Pierre.Verheecke
PROTECTED]] Envoyi : lundi 12 novembre 2001 18:00 @ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit".. . What about making a batch file like winvnc -kill winvnc -remove winvnc_new install and then running that? -Original Message- From: [EMAI

RE: RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit"...

2001-11-12 Thread Steve Palocz
PROTECTED] Subject: RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit"... Yes i tried it now and it's not possible, so it seems impossible to make an automatic upgrade of winvnc if disableshutdown is enable because we can't stop winvnc service and the files stay open a

RE: RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit".. .

2001-11-12 Thread Matthew . van . Eerde
What about making a batch file like winvnc -kill winvnc -remove winvnc_new install and then running that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 08:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still

RE : RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit"...

2001-11-12 Thread Jean-Pierre.Verheecke
do that in one line we must autorise the close option Thanks, JP -Message d'origine- De : Glenn Mabbutt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyi : lundi 12 novembre 2001 17:03 @ : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet : RE: RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit"...

RE: RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit"...

2001-11-12 Thread Glenn Mabbutt
I don't know for sure, but if I had to guess it would be "no". You'll just have to try it ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE : Problem: WinVNC Server Still Running After "Exit".

RE: RE : WinVNC Service Helper

2001-10-22 Thread Fernandes, Anthony C
Hi JP, The Service Helper is a small configuration tool that helps the host to configure the installation, change password, kill clients, etc. It's a white square with the letters VNC entwined. Thanks Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

Re: Re: AW: password protected screensaver causes "connection closed by peer"

2001-09-12 Thread Stefane Bridy
--- Kevin Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribis: ... ... > > What's this "send ctrl+alt+del" that you find in a "system > menu". What "system menu"? Sorry to be dull. :-( That's the menu you get by right-clicking on the task bar button of the open VNC connection. BTW, the send th

Re: RE: Why "IdleTimeout" deactivated by "Poll Full Screen", is it normal?

2001-09-11 Thread Ryan Casey
Hmmm...guess that kinda kills my theory then :) Ryan - Original Message - From: "Stefane Bridy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:24 AM Subject: RE: RE: Why "IdleTimeout" deactivated by "Poll Full Screen&

RE: RE: Why "IdleTimeout" deactivated by "Poll Full Screen", is it normal?

2001-09-11 Thread Stefane Bridy
I guessed so, but if it's so, it should be the same for every polling option! As only the polling area changes, but not the process. Polling occurs frequently, for with IdleTimeout as small as 3 seconds, it still doesn't work. I really seems to indicate a kind of bug, but it seems no one who know

Thanx-Re: RE: Send Ctrl+Esc to remote computer : really no one knows how ?

2001-09-06 Thread Stéfane Bridy
Tank you John! Yesterday someone told me something like that, but I understood then that "control down" was Ctrl + arrow down ! And I hadn't either understood that "Send control down" meant holding the key control down ! Thanx for the precision, it's working all right. Actually, I've been

RE: RE: Re: Resetting Xvnc using xdm

2001-08-24 Thread davidwestbury
Oh yes! I'm a happy man! Thank you: * Evan - for introducing me to the -inetd -once options. This got me the connect behavior I've been looking for. Thanks again man. * Steve and egb - for clueing me in on -fp option. I've been looking at VNC (off and on) for months but couldn't

RE: Re: Resetting Xvnc using xdm

2001-08-24 Thread Edric Bulalacao
For Solaris font path, use this switch -fp tcp/localhost:7100 - To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---

RE: Re: Resetting Xvnc using xdm

2001-08-23 Thread Steve Palocz
Hey David, Which Unix are you using. In Solaris 2.6,7 it is -fp tcp/localhost:7100 Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re: Resetting Xvnc

RE: Re: Resetting Xvnc using xdm

2001-08-23 Thread davidwestbury
Oh wow Evan! Nice suggestion! This does exactly what I want. It starts a fresh Xvnc each time I connect just like you said. Trouble is, things don't look the same now. Seems to be a font issue. Xterms for example have strange horizontal character spacing. Double spacing for each character I type f

Re: Re: "Connection Closed" error (Scott C. Best)

2001-08-05 Thread Asa Ayers
how do you change your VNC server's http port? - Original Message - > Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:35:51 -0700 (PDT) > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: re: "Connection Closed" error > > Brian: > Heya. It sounds as if your office-place firewall > and/or router (the Cisco and

Re: RE: Not VNC Question - Just don't know where to look

2001-07-21 Thread Christopher Koeber
Yes, thank you very much but I don't know where to actually by the bandwith needed for such and operation, do I need to go through an ISP to do this ( I really don't want to )or do I call a telephone company for a special line or ... ?? If you can supply this information, that would be very h

Re: [Re: My Question about desktop sharing.... (correction)]

2001-07-18 Thread Lee Allen
Payman N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's assume I get a home router, connect my cable modem to the router. So > both my PC and laptob can have internet access. Can I set up my PC as a web > or > ftp server? (since they will have a 10.XXX or 192.XXX addresses). Any systems behind the firewall

RE: [Re: My Question about desktop sharing.... (correction)]

2001-07-18 Thread Glenn Mabbutt
ROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Re: My Question about desktop sharing (correction)] Ok, Let's assume I get a home router, connect my cable modem to the router. So both my PC and laptob can have internet access. Can I set up my PC as

Re: [Re: My Question about desktop sharing.... (correction)]

2001-07-18 Thread Payman N
Ok, Let's assume I get a home router, connect my cable modem to the router. So both my PC and laptob can have internet access. Can I set up my PC as a web or ftp server? (since they will have a 10.XXX or 192.XXX addresses). Can I have the upload option? Payman "Lee Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [RE: a Question ]

2001-07-16 Thread iandog
mailing to the group is good. (I think so anyway.) keep it up > Sorry, I sent the last email to the group. > > > Glenn, > > One last Q: > The netmeeting will give me the Graphic Remote access between two Windows2000 > (like PC anywhere)? or it's just a file sharing? > > Payman > > > > >

Re: [RE: a Question ]

2001-07-16 Thread Payman N
Sorry, I sent the last email to the group. Glenn, One last Q: The netmeeting will give me the Graphic Remote access between two Windows2000 (like PC anywhere)? or it's just a file sharing? Payman Glenn Mabbutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you can't use NetBEUI with VNC, you have to set up T

Re: [RE: a Question ]

2001-07-16 Thread Payman N
Glenn, One last Q: The netmeeting will give me the Graphic Remote access between two Windows2000 (like PC anywhere)? or it's just a file sharing? Payman Glenn Maks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Windows by default comes with Microsoft Netmeeting, Netmeeting has the ability to be configured for sec

Re: Re: Configuration Question

2001-07-07 Thread Lucas Jenner
VGhhbmtzLCAgIEkgd2lsbCBzZXQgaXQgdXAgd2hlbiBJIGdldCBiYWNrIHRvIHdvcmsuDQoNCkhh dmUgYSBnb29kIGRheQ0KDQoNCkx1a2UNCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCkx1Y2FzIFcu IEplbm5lcg0KTmV0d29yayBhbmQgKk5peCBBZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yDQpNb3ZlcnMsIEluYy4NCjkw Ny0yMzAtODc0NCAtIENlbGwvVm9pY2UgTWFpbA0KOTA3LTI0OC0yMTAwIC0gV29yaw0

RE: RE#2: Win2k with AD

2001-06-28 Thread Mark Debenham
Are you running any form of port blocker because if you are this may well be affecting it, ie firewall/ tcp wrappers etc etc?? Double check everything, and make sure you don't have address authentication wrongly set in the registry, Mark -Original Message- From: Arek Lichwa [mailto:[EMAI

Re: Re:

2001-06-26 Thread Bryan Pendleton
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Ryan Casey wrote: > So this brings us back to the first question: > > Can we add an RFB message type to get a data stream to a file instead of > screen updates? A great idea came out of the last discussion about adding file exchange - VNC already knows how to do clipboard t

Re: Re:

2001-06-26 Thread Ryan Casey
So this brings us back to the first question: Can we add an RFB message type to get a data stream to a file instead of screen updates? Ryan - Original Message - From: "Mark Debenham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10

Re: Re:

2001-06-26 Thread Ryan Casey
My apoligies if so. I thought it made its inital connection over TCP, then switched to UDP for communication. Ryan - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:13 AM Subject: RE: Re

RE: Re:

2001-06-26 Thread Mark Debenham
ne 2001 15:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re: >UDP (In my eyes) certainly is not suitable for FTP however if a UDP >packet with a signature was sent which inturn triggered a TCP >connection then maybe that would be a better way to go, only a thought, Wait a second... VNC alread

RE: Re:

2001-06-26 Thread Jonathan Morton
>UDP (In my eyes) certainly is not suitable for FTP however if a UDP packet >with a signature was sent which inturn triggered a TCP connection then maybe >that would be a better way to go, only a thought, Wait a second... VNC already uses TCP, not UDP. -- ---

RE: Re:

2001-06-26 Thread Mark Debenham
2001 14:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: > Mark, I agree with you for the most part. VNC is great and much less > intrusive. Just wish it had file transfer capabilities. I seem to > always need that at one time or another. I also have need of this at times. Interestingly enou

Re: Re:

2001-06-26 Thread Ryan Casey
> Mark, I agree with you for the most part. VNC is great and much less > intrusive. Just wish it had file transfer capabilities. I seem to always > need that at one time or another. I also have need of this at times. Interestingly enough though, the most recent time I used pcAnywhere's file tran

Re: Re: 2 Xvnc bugs (and patches): 16bpp and internal keyboard mapping

2001-04-23 Thread Vincent DEDIEU
Tristan I tested the xmodmap command to set an Xvnc French keyboard mapping... And it doesn't work. It's like the VNC server is not able to change dynamicaly it's default keyboard map (i.e. hardcoded keyboard map). For example, on a French keyboard the row above "AZERTYU..." is different than

Re: Re : jVNC Working

2001-04-17 Thread W. Brian Blevins
Raj, > Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:13:41 -0700 (PDT) > From: Rruler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Re : jVNC Working > > HI Brain > > Thx for replay .. but sorry is dint get u ... i know > that codes work ... > > Wot i earlier mean was that .. the sourc

Re: Re : jVNC Working

2001-04-16 Thread Rruler
HI Brain Thx for replay .. but sorry is dint get u ... i know that codes work ... Wot i earlier mean was that .. the source code provided by u ( tridia ) or the ur client .. is a 100% working codes ? .. of there is something else needed to make it run ( as that swing demo on ur site ) ... Thx

Re: Re: Q: Xvnc and i18n?

2001-04-13 Thread 나상옥
> Greetings. > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 06:13:14PM +0900, $B3*;s?A(B wrote: > > Hi! > > Can you test IMdkit on Xvnc? > > Sorry I can't test it but, > > > In my case, Ami(korean input program) using IMdkit does well > > with xf86 server, but Ami doesn't work on Xvnc. > > Xvnc doesn't propagat

Re: Re:>4 parameters to Xvnc in inetd.conf?

2001-04-09 Thread Ryan Casey
Thank you! It was my SGID that was my problem. Ryan P. Casey - Original Message - From: "David Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 12:54 PM Subject: Re:>4 parameters to Xvnc in inetd.conf? > Solaris has a limit on the number of caracters on a

Re: Re: TCPip Ports List

2001-03-16 Thread Ran Sasson
Thanks , esp. Carsten Meier & Mark Mullins (-: in case someone needs some links of tcp/ip ports list: the Most general informative : http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~rakerman/port-table.html the Official (03-15-2001) : http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers the Micro$oft (Oct 30, 200

RE: Re: SSH and VNC

2001-03-07 Thread Zmer Andranigian
make sure you are not trying to connect to the same port as you have vnc running on locally. that may be your problem. -Original Message- From: Jefferson Cowart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 3:31 AM To: Vnc-List@Uk. Research. Att. Com Subject: RE: Re: SSH and

Re: Re: SSH and VNC

2001-03-06 Thread Mac Reiter
At 01:28 PM 3/6/01 -0500, you wrote: >Then double check to make sure that you added the registry value correctly >(it does NOT go in the "Default" key). I don't think you have to, but try >stopping and re-starting the WinVNC Service. (to original poster) Also, make sure that you are in the right

Re: Re: SSH and VNC

2001-03-06 Thread Michael Erdely
CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2001 12:46 PM Subject: RE: Re: SSH and VNC > I am running 3.3.3 R7 which I think is current on Windows Professional > 2000 SP1 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B

RE: Re: SSH and VNC

2001-03-06 Thread Jefferson Cowart
I am running 3.3.3 R7 which I think is current on Windows Professional 2000 SP1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Erdely Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 07:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: SSH and VNC What version of VNC

Re: Re: SSH and VNC

2001-03-06 Thread Michael Erdely
What version of VNC are you using? I've never seen that not work. What version of Windows are you using? -ME - Original Message - From: "Jefferson Cowart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Vnc-List@Uk. Research. Att. Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Re: SSH and VNC

2001-03-06 Thread Jefferson Cowart
I went to that website and added the mentioned key to the registry, but it still tells me local loopback connections disabled. Any other ideas? Thanks Jefferson Cowart [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Original Message - Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:48:18 -0500 From: "Michael Erdely" <

RE: RE: RE: Hiding Taskbar Icon

2001-02-28 Thread Hamish
doh! sorry...i'm so used of the reply it never crossed my mind [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanx hamish -Original Message- From: Rene Skudstrup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2001 2:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: RE: Hiding Taskbar Icon Yhen perhab

Re: RE: RE: Hiding Taskbar Icon

2001-02-28 Thread Rene Skudstrup
40 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: Hiding Taskbar Icon > > >I have a recompiled VNC without the icon > >Email me at > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >regards >rene >- >To unsubscribe, se

RE: RE: Hiding Taskbar Icon

2001-02-27 Thread Hamish
a copy would be most appreciated regards hamish -Original Message- From: Rene Skudstrup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: Hiding Taskbar Icon I have a recompiled VNC without the icon Email me at [EMAIL

Re: RE: Hiding Taskbar Icon

2001-02-27 Thread Rene Skudstrup
I have a recompiled VNC without the icon Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] regards rene - To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch

Re: Re: Mac VNC server with multi-user?

2001-01-31 Thread Ryan T. Jones
> >Basically I want to be able to use the Multi-user setup of Mac OS >>9.1, and be able to log in and out remotely without multi-users >>'quitting' the VNCserver application upon logout--thus severing my > >connection. > >Although I use MacOS 9 on one of my machines, I haven't tried using >Multi

RE: Re: VNC and SSH

2001-01-29 Thread Marcus Mills
Comedy! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Creegan > Sent: 29 January 2001 14:48 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re: VNC and SSH > > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 Glendon Gross wrote: > > > Is

Re: Re: VNC and SSH

2001-01-29 Thread John Creegan
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 Glendon Gross wrote: > Is this because RoadRunner is blocking ICMP packets at their firewall? > Or is it because RoadRunner does not allow forwarding of the ports that > Zebedee requires? I am curious because I have a 2-way RoadRunner cable > gateway, and can telnet to my mac

Re: Re; "Connection Closed" Problem

2001-01-15 Thread Igor Kocherov
Oh, thank you. I think that was the problem - I had IIS Manager opened and the MMC was answering if I wanted to save the changes... Now I know I have to close all the windows manually and then reboot... Thanks to all! - Original Message - From: "Joshua Chessman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T

Re: RE:

2001-01-02 Thread awaco
-ind.com] >> Sent: 29 December 2000 16:10 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re:"ethical" to hide the VNC logo ... >> >> I think the icon should stay. But some method of making the >> configuration >> "read-only" would be nice. > >If you read the documentation, there's a registry setting (I thi

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
Let's not appoint anybody. Let anybody answer RTFM who feels the need; just do it in a private mail. If they get several such mails, they'll either get the message or leave the list in a huff. Date: 22.12.2000 22:10 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
I can't understand why some people insist on not discussing the entire content. It has been mentioned a number of times that if that scheme is to work and if the list is to serve it's intended puprpose to serve as a reference even for those who didn't ask a question, it is of utmost importance tha

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Erdely, Michael
"Carlyle Sutphen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2001 9:16 AM Subject: Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion > I think you misunderstood. The private mail is meant to keep the investigation > out of the list. Whenever any new knowl

Re: RE: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
No, no, discussion is good along the lines of "what is better A or B", "well I like A better because ..." and "B does it for me because..." It's the clarifications and "try this, if it doesn't work, try that" that the list can do without. Once the question has been sufficiently clairified, this c

Re: Re: Noise on the vnc-list : suggestion

2001-01-02 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
I think you misunderstood. The private mail is meant to keep the investigation out of the list. Whenever any new knowledge surfaces, they should, of course, be posted to the list as well as the final solution. The private mails need not be one-on-one. They should be addressed to all who are showin

Re: Re:"ethical" to hide the VNC logo ...

2000-12-29 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
>Squid-proxy and firewall aren't going to catch people deleting system >files But neither is VNC really, you may see them do it but the files are still gone. If these are NT systems you need better file permissions, if these are Win9x boxes you could at least use system policies to mungle the

Re: Re:"ethical" to hide the VNC logo ...

2000-12-29 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Dries Feys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:38 AM Subject: RE: Re:"ethical" to hide the VNC logo ... > A good configured NT system will... > Or a good Ghost copied version of the different pc's can help also very m

RE: Re:"ethical" to hide the VNC logo ...

2000-12-29 Thread Dries Feys
A good configured NT system will... Or a good Ghost copied version of the different pc's can help also very much... BUT Has this something to do with VNC ? Regards, Dries Squid-proxy and firewall aren't going to catch people deleting system files > I recommended too him, off list, that perhap

Re: Re:"ethical" to hide the VNC logo ...

2000-12-29 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Squid-proxy and firewall aren't going to catch people deleting system files > I recommended too him, off list, that perhaps Squid-proxy and a firewall would > be a better way to solve the problem. "Control" is always better than "monitor > (spy?)", and I think it would require less work. But t

RE: RE: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ?

2000-12-28 Thread Ian Cowley
3.3.2r3 came out a long time ago. We are now on version 3.3.3r7, which has the features you describe. Hope this helps. Ian Cowley > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 December 2000 15:05 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

RE: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ?

2000-12-28 Thread Michael Mullen
Then try another program intended for such use: PC Spy: http://www.softdd.com/pcspy/index.htm Sky Tech: http://www.spytech-web.com Or any one of the many software products available out there to do silent monitoring. -- this action "to hide VNC logo ..." is completely necessary in

Re: RE: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ?

2000-12-28 Thread awaco
>Sujet: RE: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ? >Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:55:55 -0600 > >Question 45 on the FAQ: >Q45 Can I get rid of the taskbar icon created by WinVNC? -- many thanks ... BUT the answer says : "However, there might be occasions where you wou

Re: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ?

2000-12-28 Thread awaco
>-Message d'origine- >De: "Simon Biber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >A: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sujet: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ? >Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 00:35:13 +1100 > >It's designed to generate curiosity. It is wrong to spy on people, to watch >their actions without their understanding and co

RE: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ?

2000-12-27 Thread Kelly F. Hickel
Question 45 on the FAQ: Q45 Can I get rid of the taskbar icon created by WinVNC? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 11:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ? >-Message d'

Re: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ?

2000-12-27 Thread John Wilson
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 27 December 2000 17:40 Subject: Re: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ? [snip] > SORRY, but my question "to hide the VNC logo... " > is NOT in the FAQ ... i did not see it > If I saw

Re: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ?

2000-12-27 Thread awaco
>-Message d'origine- >Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 15:15:16 -0600 (CST) >De: Dan Fulbright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >A: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sujet: Re: how to hide the VNC logo ? >>> How is it possible to hide the VNC logo located on the taskbar (windows 98), >> on the right and down, even of course

Re: RE: Problems with Compiling Xvnc

2000-12-21 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
When I use -query localhost Xvnc just ends and the log file looks fine; no reason for quitting. I think AIX is doing something unusual. I've begun some testing on Solaris and I don't have the same problems as with AIX. I'll eventually find out what's up. Date: 21.12.2000 07:36 To:

Re: RE: Problems with Compiling Xvnc

2000-12-20 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
I have ideas. I almost have it working. Please read my post titled Xvnc running from dtlogin has screwy keyboard; NEW NEWS!!! It outlines all steps I've taken so far to get the login. Unfortunately, noone has been able to help me with my last hurdle. Not even IBM!!! Date: 20.12.2000 23

Re: RE: Problems with Compiling Xvnc

2000-12-20 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
It should be made during the make World run. Did you abbreviate your output from make? I get: snip- Building Release 6.3 of the X Window System. I hope you checked the configuration parameters in ./config/cf to see if

Re: Re: Sources.

2000-12-19 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
>> There is are two lists of packages, "binary" and "other" on the VNC >> download page. All of the source packages are listed under "other". >> You can find the Java source package 2nd from the bottom. >> >> Cheers, > Thanx a lot! I thought that was some java client sources. :) That's exactly wh

Re: RE: running 2 servers?

2000-12-15 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
Ok, now that makes sense. I'm a Unix guy who only uses NT at work because that's the company's strategic choice. You know how that goes ;-) Anyway, it is theoretically possible if the service is renamed. Somebody who knows what to change and if the package has to be recompiled or if some tool ex

Re: Re: Server documentation?

2000-12-14 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
Excuse me for assuming you were refering to the unix version. I haven't developed under Windows for a long time (ver. 3.2 ;-) ) but I would be willing to bet that a lot of your questions could be answered by loading it into Microsoft Developer Studio and poking around. Date: 13.12.

Re: RE: SOURCE CODE

2000-12-13 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
Now there's really no call for that! You may not have seen the preceeding two answers to his question but there is no call to be so rude. That's one of the nice things about this list is that the responders are generally polite, if not outright friendly. If you can't give advice without being ins

Re: Re: WinVNC auth request box

2000-12-07 Thread Carlyle Sutphen
Agreed, stealing the focus is a bad idea but there are a couple of applications on NT4 that can display on top without taking the focus. The Task Manager and Exceed's Virtual Desktop are just two but I've seen others. Date: 07.12.2000 17:03 To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply