Mark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> I've tried using HTTPort to
> tunnel, and have also tried using Harmen van der Wal's VNC client (although
> even this required learning more about Java than I knew before - now FA rather
> than its square root) - I get as far as the password scree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have the latest version of ICQ for windows... and the different proxy settings
>that are available are as follows SOCKS4, SOCKS5 and HTTPS. only HTTPS
>actually works.
> This is partially what I am basing my understanding on..
>
> All other applic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Unfortunately SocksCap32 only has support for Socks4 and Socks5 proxies, and I need
>support for HTTPS proxies. Is there anything else I can try
>
This is very confusing. Your wrote:
>However, I cannot get past the firewall, which has SOCKS https support..
Steve Boardman wrote:
>
> Quoting from the VNC website:
>
> "Harmen van der Wal has made a patch to the VNC 3.3.3 Java Viewer Source
> Distribution, that allows the viewer to connect through a firewall using an
> HTTP proxy. This patch is available at
> http://ww
"Scott C. Best" wrote:
>
> Gerard:
> Heya. I'd suggest not trying to work-around the
> corporate firewall and SOCKS proxy, but rather to use them.
That kind of use of a proxy could be excactly what a work-around
the corporate firewall is! Of course it all depends on how the
proxy is conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would definately like to give it a try...
>
I suspect Mindterm provides a cleaner solution, so maybe you
should try that first.
But if you like, you can start by setting up
http://www1.tip.nl/~t515027/brandgang/ and testing it with your
(Socks) proxy. Then fe
Jonathan Morton wrote:
<...>
> I would suggest talking to your network admin. If you can't make him
> understand what SSH is and why it's a good thing, talk to his manager
> about getting a new network admin. Of course, if he has good, logical
> reasons why he doesn't want SSH going, that's up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<...>
> >Mindterm is a Java SSH client which supports HTTP proxy, perhaps your firewall
> >would allow
> >using Mindterm. See http://www.mindbright.se/mindterm
The OP is using Socks, but that is also supported by Mindterm.
> >I am goign to try it
Please let us know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This place is crazy... why we cant have a transparent firewall I dont know
Maybe they had good reasons to support only certain applications.
Think about it.
> but every protocol except HTTP and FTP are blocked.
Protocol or port? Socks doesn't read application-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Yes, u get the login screen... but it cant get any further as it starts to use
> ports 5900 + and this is blocked by the proxy.
That makes sense. The browser knows how to use socks, the java
applet does not.
>
> So I still need an viewer with SOCKS htpps support ..
Tony Lin wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am using the update versions from "uk.research.at.com". When I use Java
> Applet from IE or Netscape to connect to a PC(windows 2000), it has an error
> message " com.ms sedurity.SecurityExcepionEx[rfbProto.]: cannot access
> "192.9.200.69". 5900". Can someon
Jack Frozt wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how to Ghost? Like in pcAnywhere. Where you change
> something in the registry and you can be on a users computer and they can't
> see you. Yet you can still work on it. Also, is there a way to hide the tray
> icon?
>
They say linux is a true multighost op
Harmen van der Wal wrote:
>
> Jan, I think you should bind WinVNC to the dial-up interface.
>
Sorry, that is probably incorrect. Please ignore.
--
Harmen
http://www1.tip.nl/~t515027/
-
To unsubscribe, send a message
Lee Allen wrote:
>
> > But how do you find out what the right address is?!? According to my
> > provider, it is 194.109.244.216. But if I enter this address, VNC doesn't
> > find it.
>
> If you have DSL, there is a very good chance you have a DSL modem/firewall.
> And this device is probably per
Nathan Wright wrote:
>
> I thought the default display for Windows machines was 0, therefore I
> was connecting to port 5800 since I read somewhere that was the port
> used for login. Then the display was supposed to come through port 5900
> by default.
You did the right thing.
> Another littl
"Stacy D. Coil" wrote:
>
> I saw that there were patches to the vnc server (a long time ago) that
> enabled ssl encryption. Does that still work?
>
> What I envision is being able to access a vnc server from a web browser
> using ssl (i.e. type https://my.vncserver.com:5800/). Is this
> possi
James ''Wez'' Weatherall wrote:
>
> > James Weatherall asked "Why do people want to move the VNC port under 100"
> >
> > Because many of us behind corporate firewall's and Proxy's are only
> allowed
> > to talk to the outside world on port 80.
>
> This worries me. Sending VNC through your firew
Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> ><...>
> > If there is sufficient
> >interest I would be willing to create a "VNC for Dummies and Windows
> >Weenies" document. Please let me know if this would be worth while. If I
> >don't hear from the group, I won't spend the time re-writing documents for
> >the les
"Schonborg, Thomas" wrote:
>
> As they say in New England. You can't get there from here.
>
(Nigel)
> But that's what firewalls are there for! if you could bypass the firewall it
> wouldn't be much of a firewall. SSH is probably going to be the best bet
>
I'm not a native speaker, but then wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> I have installed VNC Server at y office successfully. When I am trying to
> connect it from my home with internet browser by giving http://IPADDRESS:5800 as
> address, it is giving me following error:
>
> java.netNoRouteToHostException: Operation timed ou
Tetsuji Tsujikawa wrote:
>
> Dear Sir.
>
> I am user of VNC.
> Please let us have remedy against the following trouble.
>
> When I access to the server in which VNC is installed by using the Internet
>Explorer 5.5 on a client PC, the browser displays the following error message, "java.
Rene Mejorado wrote:
<...>
> I have a problem with using the vnc viewer over a ras connection. When ever
> I logon to our lan and try using the vnc viewer from home it cannot connect
> to any workstations on the remote lan. However when I use IE I am able to
> connect. I'm concerned about how sec
Seth Kneller wrote:
>
> Harmen van der Wal writes:
> >Is there a version of VNC that doesn't do anything, but just shows the
> >logo?
> >I think it is wrong to invade the privacy of my users, so I want to
> >discourage visiting porn sites and such, by having th
Glenn Mabbutt wrote:
>
>
> ...users who have shut down VNC get a personal encounter with
> some "sucker rod" [1].
>
> [1] - See the syslogd(8) man page on most Linux systems.
>
>
>
> The cygwin man page for syslogd has no reference for "sucker rod". Can you
> briefly summarize the reference al
Is there a version of VNC that doesn't do anything, but just shows the
logo?
I think it is wrong to invade the privacy of my users, so I want to
discourage visiting porn sites and such, by having the VNC logo in the
taskbar change color in a random fashion;)
--
Harmen
http://www1.tip.nl/~t515027
Darren Evans wrote:
>
<...>
> Has anyone updated mindvnc since mindbright have stopped
> supporting/developing it? I don't fully understand how it works
> yet.
>
> Is there any documentation on using mindvnc, since Mindbright
> have taken it down?
<...>
It supports lots of modes of operation,
Darren Evans wrote:
>
> First let me say, i'm aware of Mindbright's Mindvnc which is no longer
> supported.
Yes, but they seem to be planning a SSH (& SSL) API, so rolling your own
secure Java VNC viewer will be easy. (SSH-->RFB / SSL-->RFB)
>
> I want to run a java vnc client securely from an
"Joseph A. Knapka" wrote:
>
> [Possibly this should be in the FAQ. It doesn't come up very
> often on the list, but two or three people have sent me
> emails directly. I'll add it to my VNC page as well.]
<...>
> > Now the thing is I know that ports 2000 through 2010 are open over TCP.
<...>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am not sure if this has been noticed, or if VNC does not like special
> characters as a password, but within the Win version I had set the password
> to "QPH@#as9%" without the "". When I use the viewer to access the server I
> can use ANY character as the last cha
"Joseph A. Knapka" wrote:
> Of course, if you don't have access to the firewall, or the
> administrator perversely refuses to allow SSH connections, you
> are SOL. But I would argue that, since you *must* open some
> port, all other things being equal, the SSH port (22) is the
> best candidate fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Is there a quick and dirty method of getting the viewer to access my home
> computer from here at work behind the firewall? Any help would be
> appreciated as this has become a vendetta of mine. I am determined to get
> this working. :-)
>
So how about your fi
"Erlichmen, Shay" wrote:
>
> Wow, our company does the same thing, and we discover the VNC is not very
> efficient with multiple connections, so for that propose we wrote VNCProxy.
> The proxy connects to the VNC server with a single connection and tunnel the
> data stream to its clients. I guess
Gordon Steven-QSG001 wrote:
>
> Some time ago I asked about VNC through a firewall that only allows port 80
> to pass through. The following articles were suggested:
>
> http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/archives/2000-04/0205.html
> http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/archives/2000-04/0294.html
"S.C.Best" wrote:
>
> Raji:
> Hello! So if I recall the situation correctly...your
> workplace firewall only allows a handful of 'standard' ports
> thru, like HTTP and FTP, and not something like VNC.
>You've
> an NT machine behind this firewall at work, and want to VNC
> to your home Wi
Dave Drager wrote:
>
> Kevin,
>
> I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure that VNC doesn't let you log in to a
> server at another IP address.
But it does! That's what it's all about;-)
> You must serve the page on the computer where
> VNC is running.
No you don't. You must however host the appl
"Kevin M. Hilscher" wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave,
>
> Now I am presented with the applet login. However, now when I login it
> gives me the following error message:
>
> com.ms.security.SecurityExceptionEx[rfbProto.]: cannot connect to
> "10.1.0.15"
>
> Here is the HTML code. Keep in mind that the th
"Kevin M. Hilscher" wrote:
>
> I would like to separate the Java Applet HTML from the WinVNC server and
> load it onto a web server. Then I would like to change some of the
> applet default parameters, such as value="Yes">
So you are just separating the HTML, and not the applet...
>
> I've at
"Scott C. Best" wrote:
>
> Raji:
> Hello! As Harmen wrote, I'm a big fan of:
>
> > http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html
<...>
> As Harmen suggested, for
> something noisy like VNC, follow the README example for
> choosing a good buffer-size. If your IT guys at work ever
> comp
Janice Adams wrote:
>
> SET IE TO NOT USE PROXY FOR THIS PARTICULAR ADDRESS
>
The java vncviewer will not use the browser configured proxy (for
590x/rfb) anyway, and it can not be configured to do so at all.
I have been working on a Java vncviewer that does transparently use the
browser config
The 2nd (experimental) release works pretty well, be it still a bit on
the slow side.
http://www.workspot.net/~harmen/vnc/experimental/
This tunnels RFB over HTTP, without the applet throwing Java security
exceptions while using a HTTP proxy.
That may come in handy for those who have to bypass p
Be prepared for low speeds and long proxy access logs;-)
Here's my patches to the Java applet that allows it to use a local proxy
without throwing security exceptions.
A virtual bidirectional datapath is maintained through multiple HTTP GET
& POST requests. For now the server-end is handled by a
"Joseph A. Knapka" wrote:
>
> Hi, Harmen,
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~jknapka/vncpatch.html
>
> Toward the bottom are patches for Xvnc and WinVNC
> that attempt to implement HTTP tunnelling. They
> just look for a POST request on the RFB port,
> reply with an HTTP "OK", and then start the RF
"Habermann, David (DA)" wrote:
>
> You might want to consider that almost all firewalls support CONNECT type
> requests on port 443 (HTTPS).
>
> Dave
The current HTTP/VNC applet I have already uses HTTP CONNECT (see link
below).
The problem with that is Java applet security.
--
Harmen
Firewa
Harmen van der Wal wrote:
<...>
> That would be "Full-duplex Firewall Tunneling with Low Overhead". What
> worries me about that, is that "simulative multiplexed communication" by
> using HTTP/1.0's GET or POST operator, seems to be the only
"Joseph A. Knapka" wrote:
>
> Harmen van der Wal wrote:
> >
<...>
> > Well, I'm no expert on this, but I've been planning to look into this
> > for a while now, and maybe build the ideal firewall Java viewer;-) I
> > guess the techiniques
"Joseph A. Knapka" wrote:
>
> Harmen van der Wal wrote:
<...>
> I understand now. Is there any standard for tunnelling other
> protocols over HTTP, or do all of those services use their
> own ad-hoc methods?
Well, I'm no expert on this, but I've been p
"Joseph A. Knapka" wrote:
>
> Harmen van der Wal wrote:
> >
<...>
> > > The Java applet -- aah. Probably doesn't know it has to go through port
> > > 80 to get to the VNC server. It is probably trying to use 5900 or
> > > similar.
>
"Joseph A. Knapka" wrote:
>
> Jon Smith wrote:
> >
> > I downloaded your patch for win VNC so that i would be able to use VNC at school
> > (which has a proxy only allowing some ports like port 80) I changed the port
> > setting in the registry to port 80 and i have just tried to access my home
"A. Di Santo" wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I hope I'm mailing this message to the proper person(s).
>
> I am one of many people at my office who are behind a proxy server and
> firewall. The firewall is a packet-filtering variety which has port 5800
> open. When I use my netscape or I.E. browser t
49 matches
Mail list logo
