[USRP-users] Re: Sensor issue

sensor:( BR Nikos On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 9:44 PM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 2025-05-24 14:35, Nikos Balkanas wrote: > uhd_usrp_get_rx_sensor(dev[channel], "lo_locked", channel, &lo_locked))) You need to repeatedly call this i

[USRP-users] Re: Sensor issue

On 2025-05-24 14:35, Nikos Balkanas wrote: uhd_usrp_get_rx_sensor(dev[channel], "lo_locked", channel, &lo_locked))) You need to repeatedly call this in your while loop. All you're doing is getting the sensor value once, immediately after tuning, and then spinning on the value of the "value_to_

[USRP-users] Re: Manual Tuning advise

On 2025-05-24 09:48, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Hello, I was reading the 2016 paper by Ibrahim & Galal (ETRI journal 38, 3, 2016) about tuning hops. The authors present a tuning algorithm with a sequence of none-manual and manual-manual tunings. Are their results still valid after 10 yrs or is the

[USRP-users] Re: Curious energy spikes from my X310

export as C API the tune_request(freq, lo_off) C++ constructor. This will mean to change code in uhd, which I will eventually have to, but right now, getting uhd_usrp_get_rx_lo_names() to work, is better:) BR Nikos

[USRP-users] Re: Curious energy spikes from my X310

ee to advise. LO is not part of the request_tuner_t struct. It is set independently. Is this the same LO in uhd_usrp_set_rx_lo_freq? If this is the case I can modify it externally:) BR Nikos On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 4:40 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote:

[USRP-users] Re: Curious energy spikes from my X310

On 2025-05-22 21:31, Nikos Balkanas wrote: The spike is very clean to come from outside. Must be from my X310. My tuner must be adding a signal to the center frequency. The small artifact at 2 Ghz is probably the tuner not equilibrating fully. I recently updated my FPGA image. Is that where the t

[USRP-users] Re: fc64 help needed

, it's entirely up to you, but there's really no reason to use double-precision floats to process data that on the   wire are only 16 bits. On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 5:38 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 11/05/2025 22:27, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Thx Marcus, I worked it out

[USRP-users] Re: fc64 help needed

n the filesystem, less with live signals, but still faster:) And signal power is hotter:) BR Nikos FFTW3 is available in a single-precision instance -- Gnu Radio uses it.   FFTW3F. On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 4:24 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 10/05/2025 07:17, Nikos Balkanas wrote: It turn

[USRP-users] Re: fc64 help needed

On 10/05/2025 07:17, Nikos Balkanas wrote: It turns out that the problem is not just bypassing the sse2 code:( After commenting it out, uhd still crashes. The conversion output buffers are not created in _recv_one_packet() Any ideas why they don't? TIA Nikos This should *Just work*. What happe

[USRP-users] Re: B205mini Discovery Issue

the device actually appears on USB*.   In your case, "side loading" through JTAG--->FX3 is not something I   have a procedure for, but, like I said, I'm trying to find out. On May 6, 2025, at 5:43 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 06/05/2025 16:55, w...@appliedradar.com wrote: We

[USRP-users] Re: Sampling rate in E320 with RFNoC

On 06/05/2025 10:12, Maria Muñoz wrote: Hi all, We observe different behaviour using the E320 radio with the UHD: USRP_SOURCE block and the RFNoC Radio block with a low sampling rate. We are attempting to set the sampling rate to 25 kHz for both blocks. In the UHD block, we achieve this by con

[USRP-users] Re: B205mini Discovery Issue

On 06/05/2025 16:55, w...@appliedradar.com wrote: We tried plugging the unit into several PC’s and laptops, and it seems the device is not enumerating. I am starting to think the FX3 EEPROM is corrupt. Is there a way for the user to reset the FX3 firmware to factory setting? Is a programming

[USRP-users] Re: B205mini Discovery Issue

On 06/05/2025 16:55, w...@appliedradar.com wrote: We tried plugging the unit into several PC’s and laptops, and it seems the device is not enumerating. I am starting to think the FX3 EEPROM is corrupt. Is there a way for the user to reset the FX3 firmware to factory setting? Is a programming

[USRP-users] Re: B205mini Discovery Issue

On 06/05/2025 14:42, w...@appliedradar.com wrote: We are using USB-A 3.2 Gen2 ports ___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com Does your system log anything unusual when

[USRP-users] Re: B205mini Discovery Issue

On 06/05/2025 11:40, w...@appliedradar.com wrote: We have a couple of B205mini boards left over from a previous job, trying to re-purpose. Both acting the same: 1) Plug into USB and get amber power light. 2) uhd_find_devices reports “No Devices Found”. 3) “sudo lsusb” does not report anythi

[USRP-users] Re: Overflows while recording GRB signal - USRP B200 mini

On 01/05/2025 14:28, Pedro Pertusso wrote: Hi, I’m using a USRP B200 mini to receive the GOES Rebroadcast (GRB) signal at 1.6866 GHz. Before recording, I ran a benchmark using the /benchmark_rate/ script at a rate of 13 MHz, which completed without any dropped samples. The command I used was:

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

On 28/04/2025 19:08, Nikos Balkanas wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 1:31 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 28/04/2025 18:04, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Hi Marcus, spb(=samples/buffer)  is not what I hoped for. It is just another way to set the stream_cmd.num_samples in  the

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

ary.  It's not an application layer programming framework. On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 5:22 PM Nikos Balkanas wrote: Thx Marcus for the clarifications, On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 28/04/2025 05:33, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Compile

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

se, what are we gonna do? BR Nikos On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 5:01 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 27/04/2025 21:58, Nikos Balkanas wrote: My bad: throughput of 5.619 Kb/s requesting ICMP replies, +> throughput of 5,619 Kb/s requesting IC

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

You saw my code, not a smoking gun there. This is probably is a physical problem. Cable is an SFP fiber dedicated line. Cannot go bad. Maybe the connections are not sitting right :(... BR Nikos On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 6:45 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

we can switch to private mail... Try libuhd-dev Also: dpkg -S /usr/lib/uhd/examples/benchmark_rate uhd-host: /usr/lib/uhd/examples/benchmark_rate On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 2:45 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 27/04/2025 19:34, Nikos Balkanas wrote: For that i will need the sour

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

don't need to build from source. On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:39 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 27/04/2025 17:37, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Hi Marcus, You were right. No need to change NIC:) This is not a software issue. uhd_rx_streamer_max_num_samps runs right after uhd

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

Cannot go bad. Maybe the connections are not sitting right :(... BR Nikos On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 6:45 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 25/04/2025 23:33, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Actually MTU is 9000. This is one of the recommendations... I tried it

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

0] [+] Max samples/buffer[0]: 364 [WARNING] [0/Radio#0] Ignoring stream command for finite acquisition of zero sam Nikos On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 5:46 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 25/04/2025 22:26, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Thanks Marcus, for your fast reply. On Sat, Apr 26,

[USRP-users] Re: NIC suggestion

On 25/04/2025 22:26, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Thanks Marcus, for your fast reply. On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 4:08 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 25/04/2025 20:50, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Hello, I need to buy a new NIC. What would you suggest? The one I use is an old Mellanox 10 Gbs

[USRP-users] Re: max input power

On 24/04/2025 16:29, Anil Gurses via USRP-users wrote: Hi, It's the peak power input, not average. Anything beyond that level might damage the RF chain. A. THIS. Most of the Ettus/NI radios are designed for use in an "over the air" scenario, where signal levels are expected to be low,   an

[USRP-users] Re: 100 Gigabit Ethernet Suggestions for USRP x410

On 07/04/2025 12:07, Jones, James (jtjones49) wrote: Hello, I am trying to get the full sampling rate from the USRP x410 which is 400 MHz.  I understand that I will need a 100 gigabit ethernet connection to do this. Do you have any setup recommendations or rack mounted server recommendation tha

[USRP-users] Re: Max Input RF Power in X310

lue.  In the intended application space, where they are intended to be directly antenna-connected,   a signal of -15dBm is "blow the doors off" loud. On Monday 31 March 2025 at 16:59:11 BST, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 31/03/2025 11:51, zhou via USRP-users wrote: Hi, What is the max

[USRP-users] Re: Max Input RF Power in X310

onfigurable on-board amplification (up to 31.5 dB). https://kb.ettus.com/UBX The basic_RX has NO analog gain elements at all.  It's basically just a transformer-coupling to the ADCs, so your limit is   the limit of the ADCs. On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, 8:59 AM Marcus D. Leech wrote:

[USRP-users] Re: Max Input RF Power in X310

On 31/03/2025 11:51, zhou via USRP-users wrote: Hi, What is the max input signal power to RF ports in X310?  There is a spec in the below link: https://www.ettus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/X300_X310_Spec_Sheet_2024-01-23.pdf There are max output powers, but not input power. I am using UBX-

[USRP-users] Re: [EXT] Re: X440 Phase Coherent but not Phase Aligned

ctice. *From:* Chris Rogers *Sent:* Thursday, March 27, 2025 1:51 PM *To:* Marcus D. Leech *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com *Subject:* [EXT] [USRP-users] Re: X440 Phase Coherent but not Phase Aligned Hi Heath and Marcus, I was actually "R&D's plate" for this one. We worked

[USRP-users] Re: X440 Phase Coherent but not Phase Aligned

On 27/03/2025 14:55, Chris Rogers wrote: I'm not super familiar with the RFNoC stuff or the python workflow, but the real key is to do timed frequency tuning of each channel, as seen in the changes from this commit : https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/de1542331ff5f9dc29e252814ddeaa645f

[USRP-users] Re: X440 Phase Coherent but not Phase Aligned

On 27/03/2025 12:46, Heath Stamm wrote: Hi, I have an X440 loaded with the X4_200 FPGA image running UHD 4.6. Using the RFNoC API, I am streaming the same 1 MHz tone into two channels at the same time (timed command) using a TX streamer going through the DUC (upsampling from 10.24MSPS to 245.

[USRP-users] Re: [X310] set_command_time introduces unexpected delay dependent on sampling rate.

On 26/03/2025 12:09, Rob Kossler wrote: Hi Marcus, I think that the gain is set from the "radio" block which operates at the master clock rate rather than the downconverted rate.  It doesn't make sense to me why the latency of the gain setting would be related to the downconverted sample ra

[USRP-users] Re: [X310] set_command_time introduces unexpected delay dependent on sampling rate.

On 26/03/2025 06:13, je.amg...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using timed commands to set the RX gain at a precise moment with the following command: set_command_time(md.time_spec + uhd::time_spec_t(0.02), 0); However, I noticed that there is a delay between the specified time and the actual time whe

[USRP-users] Re: [EXT] Re: How to record all 4 channels from an X410

On 18/03/2025 13:48, Mann, John - 0662 - MITLL wrote: Thanks Marcus, Your recommended syntax seems to have fixed my syntax and channel number errors.  I thought the subdev specs were set for each daughter board, and since each board has 2 channels, I had only been specifying 2 suibdevs for e

[USRP-users] Re: [EXT] Re: How to record all 4 channels from an X410

On 18/03/2025 11:30, Mann, John - 0662 - MITLL wrote: Yes – I was aware of that.  But I still don’t know what to put into the subdev string, because nothing seems to work. I tried: A:01 A:0 A:1 A:0,A:1 A:0 B:0 etc…. I think my problem must be something more basic that I am missing, tha

[USRP-users] Re: New X440 with fsck issues

On 17/03/2025 16:37, Brian Padalino wrote: I received an X440 and it didn't respond to being ssh'd into, so I looked at the console. It tells me that /dev/mmcblk0p2 fails fsck. Should I try loading an FS onto /dev/mmcblk0p3? What should I follow to try and recover this brand new radio? Thank

[USRP-users] Re: Can the Octoclock CDA-2990 use a Timeprovider 4100's PPS/Freq as inputs?

On 13/03/2025 09:30, Chris Newman via USRP-users wrote: Hi, I found some documentation for the Timeprovider 4100 and there are 2 ports which can be configured to output either 1PPS or 10MHz. The latter is a square wave so I guess I can plug that into the Octoclock: image.png The question no

[USRP-users] Re: Problem when working with USRP 200b mini in TX mode

On 05/03/2025 08:17, able5...@oxobrowser.com wrote: I recently started working with the USRP 200b mini in TX mode. I set up the input data(). When setting the tx_rate below 56, everything works fine, there is no data loss, the traffic is good (it is taken from the file), but as soon as I set

[USRP-users] Re: N210 not accepting uhd commands, but I can ping it.

Also, the netmask on your machine would normally be 255.255.255.0 -------- *From:* Marcus D. Leech *Sent:* Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:32 PM *To:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com *Subject:* [USRP-users] Re: N210 not accepting uhd commands, bu

[USRP-users] Re: N210 not accepting uhs commands, but I can ping it.

On 04/03/2025 11:36, Arnaldo Sans wrote: Hello, Hope everyone is well.  I am having trouble communicating with my N210.  I hope some can offer some ideas.  Here are the details... USRP: N210 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Codename lunar Computer: HP FireFly, Connectivity:   opt1:  Thunderbolt port + S

[USRP-users] Re: RX Noise Figure

Mon, Mar 3, 2025, 7:48 PM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 03/03/2025 22:23, Dustin Widmann via USRP-users wrote: > Hi all, > > I see an interesting trend and I'm not sure how to explain it ... > > I've done a y-factor measurement, sweeping the frequ

[USRP-users] Re: RX Noise Figure

On 03/03/2025 22:23, Dustin Widmann via USRP-users wrote: Hi all, I see an interesting trend and I'm not sure how to explain it ... I've done a y-factor measurement, sweeping the frequency, sampling rate, and rx-gain with an x310 with the SBX-120 daughterboard. The results seem similar to the p

[USRP-users] Re: Octoclock test

On 02/03/2025 10:30, ardelg...@gradiant.org wrote: Hi! We are testing the Octoclock-G. In this case, we attempted to connect this dispositive to an X410. The problem is determinating when the USRP and the Octoclock are synchronized. The test_sync_clock script should confirm this, but we are

[USRP-users] Re: strange behavior related to gain

On 27/02/2025 09:31, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote: If you are using timed commands and if you can verify that the tx-to-rx synchronization is consistent every time, perhaps you could measure the leakage signal (with attenuators connected to the RF ports) and then simply subtract this signal

[USRP-users] Re: REG : GPIO in USRP B205Mini

all the *other* things   that are required to launch a command over a latency-not-guaranteed bus to the external hardware, including kernel-layer   USB drivers, etc, etc. On 2025-02-21 23:37, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 21/02/2025 23:22, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,  Thanks for answ

[USRP-users] Re: REG : GPIO in USRP B205Mini

On 21/02/2025 23:22, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,  Thanks for answering.  Can you explain me clearly? Thanks. I'd suggest, at a minimum, looking at the MAN page for usleep(). On 2025-02-21 23:11, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 21/02/2025 23:05, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote

[USRP-users] Re: REG : GPIO in USRP B205Mini

On 21/02/2025 23:05, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,    In USRP B205mini-i I am able to access the GPIO Pin. I have to create a Pulse in the GPIO pin. I want to make high the gpio pin for 1microsecond and low for 999microseconds. How to achieve this timings through coding. Can you give me

[USRP-users] Re: USRPN210 frequency changing through serial port data

On 20/02/2025 11:12, Muhammad Anas wrote: Dear Community, I want to control the channel frequency in the RF options in the USRP sink block on GNU Radio Companion from the float data coming from serial port through a custom python block and the data coming is showing in the GRC environment in

[USRP-users] Re: Usable bandwidth of X300 USRP with UBX-160 daughterboard

corner. On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 13:11, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 18/02/2025 21:45, Brendan Horsfield wrote: Point taken.  At this stage we are mainly interested in straight IQ recording & playback with minimal processing.  However, in the future it would be desirable t

[USRP-users] Re: Usable bandwidth of X300 USRP with UBX-160 daughterboard

don't have a direct answer, but on an N310 I measured the roll-off   as a fraction of the overall bandwidth, and it is about 12.5%. That doesn't necessarily translate to the X310, but the   DDC implementation is of the same generation. On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 10:58, Marcus D. Leech

[USRP-users] Re: Usable bandwidth of X300 USRP with UBX-160 daughterboard

sample-rate--so very much depends on what you're doing, and how you're doing it.  Generally, as you scale up   in sample-rate, you have to scale up in:    o CPU base clock rate    o Memory bandwidth    o Number of CPUs On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 10:17, Marcus D. Leech wrote:

[USRP-users] Re: Usable bandwidth of X300 USRP with UBX-160 daughterboard

asis).  My X310 is currently elsewhere, and not populated   with a UBX-160. On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 09:55, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 18/02/2025 18:45, Brendan Horsfield wrote: Yes, I assumed that was the case.  However, it is not clear from the X300 documentation how sharp tho

[USRP-users] Re: Usable bandwidth of X300 USRP with UBX-160 daughterboard

rable pass-band. But I don't know, precisely, what the transition band is in the "nicer" filter shapes. If you have an X310+UBX-160, you can always just use a noise source, and measure it yourself to see if it's appropriate for   your application. On Tue, 18 Feb 2025

[USRP-users] Re: Usable bandwidth of X300 USRP with UBX-160 daughterboard

There will always be some edge roll off. Decimation includes filtering and those filters cannot be infinitely steep. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 18, 2025, at 2:12 AM, Brendan Horsfield > wrote: > >  > Hi All, > > I have a question about the usable bandwidth of the X300 USRP / UBX-160 > da

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC with N200

On 12/02/2025 10:22, Jose M. Nuñez Ortuño | CUD-Marín wrote: Just to be sure. Is USRP N200 a non-RFNoC device? ___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com To follow up on th

[USRP-users] Re: RFNoC with N200

On 12/02/2025 10:22, Jose M. Nuñez Ortuño | CUD-Marín wrote: Just to be sure. Is USRP N200 a non-RFNoC device? Correct.  The FPGA is of a size and generation that cannot be supported by RFNoC tooling. ___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists

[USRP-users] Re: Is it OK to build with DPDK but not use the feature

On 12/02/2025 09:49, cyberp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi We have a OOT RFNOC project and have built the UHD framework with DPDK installed but we don’t use DPDK. Is there any side-effect in doing so? Would it be better to not have the DPDK libs installed at all? Thank you, Marino I don't think

[USRP-users] Re: LO offset with external LO

On 07/02/2025 16:55, Eugene Grayver wrote: Hi, I am using N310 with external LO.  I still want to use the digital LO offset.  However, it appears that when the LO is set to external the digital LO offset is ignored.  Am I missing something or is this the intended behavior?  UHD 4.6 Eugene

[USRP-users] Re: Error when running Benchmark on USRP X440: RfnocError - OpTimeout

have an X440 myself in my "inventory" of USRP devices, so reproducing customer issues is somewhat difficult... On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:05 PM Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 06/02/2025 13:02, Rilbert Lima via USRP-users wrote: > > I ran the test using 5e6, ho

[USRP-users] Re: Error when running Benchmark on USRP X440: RfnocError - OpTimeout

On 06/02/2025 13:02, Rilbert Lima via USRP-users wrote: I ran the test using 5e6, however, the same error occurred. root@ni-x4xx-342597F:/usr/lib/uhd/examples# ./benchmark_rate --rx_rate 5e6 --tx_rate 5e6 … [00:00:04.955692172] Setting device timestamp to 0... [WARNING] [0/Radio#0] Reques

[USRP-users] Re: Error when running Benchmark on USRP X440: RfnocError - OpTimeout

On 06/02/2025 12:52, Rilbert Lima da Silva via USRP-users wrote: We are encountering an issue when trying to run the benchmark directly on the USRP X440. During the test execution, we receive the following error: RfnocError: OpTimeout: Control operation timed out waiting for ACK. This error o

[USRP-users] Re: B210 not seen by uhd_find_devices command

On 04/02/2025 11:14, Mehlhose, Matthias wrote: Hi, Any first run of a UHD application will upload the B210 firmware! Actually, any time the device is powered-off. The B210 should be identified as "2500:0020 Ettus Research LLC USRP B210" from "lsusb" after the firmware upload via the Cypres

[USRP-users] Re: B210 not seen by uhd_find_devices command

On 03/02/2025 10:37, pigatoimdeafrance...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a USRP B210 which cannot be identified uhd_find_devices on one machine but not on another. Both have installed the same UHD version: -Machine identifying the B210: - tim@srv-pws-01:

[USRP-users] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: Re: [EXTERN] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error code -63150)

lease see here. https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_usrp_x3x0.html#x3x0_setup_network_host_interface *From:* Marcus D. Leech *Sent:* Wednesday, January 29, 2025 3:21:51 PM *To:* Heinz, Dominik; Martin Braun *Cc:* usrp-

[USRP-users] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: Re: [EXTERN] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error code -63150)

SDR? I don't see what I am missing? You've given your HOST PC the same addresses as the X310.   Choose some other address.  Like   .1 or .3 -------- *From:* Marcus D. Leech *Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2025 12:32:14

[USRP-users] Re: Max input power without damaging B200-mini

On 29/01/2025 05:38, emanuele.tolo...@intecs.it wrote: Hi, I have a B200 mini that I use for monitoring purposes, and I need to install it near an RF transmitter. I'm concerned about the maximum input power the board can handle before it gets damaged. I understand that the B200 mini has a +0

[USRP-users] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: Re: [EXTERN] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error code -63150)

.40.2 *From:* Heinz, Dominik *Sent:* Monday, January 27, 2025 10:32:27 AM *To:* Martin Braun *Cc:* Marcus D. Leech; usrp-users@lists.ettus.com *Subject:* [EXTERN] [USRP-users] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: Re: [EXTERN] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error code -

[USRP-users] Re: [EXTERN] Re: Re: [EXTERN] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error code -63150)

lts in SFP0 having an address of 192.168.30.2, and SFP 1   having an address of 192.168.40.2 *From:* Martin Braun *Sent:* Friday, January 24, 2025 12:19:00 PM *To:* Heinz, Dominik *Cc:* Marcus D. Leech; usrp-users@list

[USRP-users] Re: REG : Receiving the Data In USRP b205mini

On 25/01/2025 01:05, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,   I want to receive the ADC data in USRP b205mini-i module. For that I have written the Rx streamer code using UHD API.   Actually, Rx port is connected to some signal generator of 430MHz to 470MHz. But, When i see the ADC data from str

[USRP-users] Re: REG : B205MINI-I board

pear to work just fine. On 2025-01-24 01:04, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 24/01/2025 00:33, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,    Recently, I have bought USRP B205mini board. I am working on it. I have downloaded the UHD driver from the ubuntu package(sudo apt-get install libuhd-dev

[USRP-users] Re: REG : B205MINI-I board

runtime system to keep you from doing this.   This question is generic   to C/C++, and has nothing, per se, to do with the UHD C library. On 2025-01-24 01:04, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 24/01/2025 00:33, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,    Recently, I have bought USRP B205m

[USRP-users] Re: REG : B205MINI-I board

On 24/01/2025 00:33, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,    Recently, I have bought USRP B205mini board. I am working on it. I have downloaded the UHD driver from the ubuntu package(sudo apt-get install libuhd-dev uhd-host).    When the board is connected to the PC it is detected when I give

[USRP-users] Re: REG : B205MINI-I board

On 24/01/2025 00:33, kavin...@atindriya.co.in wrote: Hi,    Recently, I have bought USRP B205mini board. I am working on it. I have downloaded the UHD driver from the ubuntu package(sudo apt-get install libuhd-dev uhd-host).    When the board is connected to the PC it is detected when I give

[USRP-users] Re: Update for AN-956, OAI Ref Arch 5G ?

On 22/01/2025 17:26, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote: I am wondering if there is an update in the near future for AN-956, OAI Reference Architecture for 5G and 6G Research with USRP.  If there is anything presently in draft form, I am wondering if you would be willing to share it prior to rele

[USRP-users] Re: [EXTERN] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error code -63150)

", but I don't *THINK* that's the issue. ------------ *From:* Marcus D. Leech *Sent:* Tuesday, January 21, 2025 8:32:39 PM *To:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com *Subject:* [EXTERN] [USRP-users] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error

[USRP-users] Re: X310 RIO Session Initialization Failure (Error code -63150)

On 21/01/2025 09:26, Heinz, Dominik wrote: I'm experiencing an initialization issue with my Ettus X310 USRP device. My setup consists of an Ettus X310 connected through a PCIe Card using a Molex cable to my Linux machine. I'm running Ubuntu with kernel version 6.8.0-51-generic and have inst

[USRP-users] files.ettus.com is back up

Just to let everyone here know that files.ettus.com is now back "on the air", so tools like uhd_images_downloader will   work again. ___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.

[USRP-users] Re: - Unable to Access USRP Driver Windows and API Documentation on files.ettus.com

us.com, it will also not work until files.ettus.com is back up. Marcus D. Leech escreveu (terça, 21/01/2025 à(s) 15:49): On 21/01/2025 10:46, Luis Oliveira wrote: Hi everyone, I encountered while trying to access the following page on the website: https://files.ettus.

[USRP-users] Re: - Unable to Access USRP Driver Windows and API Documentation on files.ettus.com

On 21/01/2025 10:46, Luis Oliveira wrote: Hi everyone, I encountered while trying to access the following page on the website: https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_python.html USRP Hardware Driver (UHD) - Ettus Research | Ettus Research, a Nation

[USRP-users] Re: SSL Handshake Failure When Downloading USRP Firmware Images

On 21/01/2025 09:02, Heinz, Dominik wrote: I'm encountering an SSL handshake failure while trying to download firmware images for my SDR using the uhd_images_downloader tool. The error occurs both when using the tool and when accessing https://files.ettus.com/binaries/images/ directly in a bro

[USRP-users] Re: Incorrect disk throughput measurement in rx_samples_to_file

On 14/01/2025 11:40, Eugene Grayver wrote: Hi, The rx_samples_to_file example uses 'dd' to estimate disk throughput. It is not done correctly.  The code below uses /dev/random as the data source.  This was OK for old SATA drives, but for fast NMVE drives the rate is limited by the random numb

[USRP-users] Re: X310 clock signal for aliasing (BasicRX daughter board)

On 08/01/2025 01:47, frie...@free.fr wrote: My understanding is that the clock signal fed to the daughter-cards is typically some fraction of the master_clock   frequency, and is designed to provide a REF signal for synthesizers, etc.   It should be synchronized to the   ADC clocks, but won't

[USRP-users] Re: X310 Bursts/Buffering with Timestamp data

On 05/01/2025 17:19, cjohn...@serranosystems.com wrote: I hope everyone had a good holiday break! Would you mind providing some guidance on the 3 questions? Thanks ___ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an ema

[USRP-users] Re: Running user application in X410

on the X410--it has all the tooling like Make, GCC, UHD and other important  libraries already on the system image. On 1/2/25 13:10, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 02/01/2025 12:56, Sakthivel Velumani wrote: Hi, I am wondering if the user can run a custom linux application on the ARM cores t

[USRP-users] Re: Running user application in X410

led in the system image on the X410. Go into Python3 and import uhd That should work. On 1/2/25 13:10, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 02/01/2025 12:56, Sakthivel Velumani wrote: Hi, I am wondering if the user can run a custom linux application on the ARM cores that can offload certain tasks to

[USRP-users] Re: Running user application in X410

On 02/01/2025 12:56, Sakthivel Velumani wrote: Hi, I am wondering if the user can run a custom linux application on the ARM cores that can offload certain tasks to the PL? or does the RFNoC core implementation allow a RFNoC block to interact with an application on the PS via the AXI interface

[USRP-users] Re: Thanks for a decade of professional fun! (Or: so long, and see you around!)

will be hosted by CCERA at Carp. If we start convincing Neel now…) Our facility isn't big enough to host a GRCon, sadly. On 30.12.24 20:03, Marcus D. Leech wrote: On 30/12/2024 13:58, Marcus Müller wrote: Hello USRP-Users, when I started hanging around on this mailing list in 20

[USRP-users] Re: Thanks for a decade of professional fun! (Or: so long, and see you around!)

On 30/12/2024 13:58, Marcus Müller wrote: Hello USRP-Users, when I started hanging around on this mailing list in 2013, I wouldn't have thought that I'd still be around eleven years later. But me asking about sporadic signal issues after retuning, which I would later be able to attribute to

[USRP-users] Re: X310 clock signal for aliasing (BasicRX daughter board)

On 20/12/2024 13:44, frie...@free.fr wrote: I am investigating chopping a signal with a fast track and hold to bring a microwave signal to baseband without relying on a mixer (I can explain why if needed but I'll skip this background part for the moment). To achieve this result I would like to f

[USRP-users] Re: Sampling channels at different rates

On 16/12/2024 14:24, Brian Padalino wrote: My guess is that you're going through another Halfband FIR filter somewhere, so there is group delay that isn't being accounted for in the digital filters. What is the lag (in samples) of the lower rate sampled signal? Brian That was my other thou

[USRP-users] Re: Sampling channels at different rates

On 16/12/2024 13:47, Christophe Grimault wrote: I followed your advice and I'm getting closer !-) I tried this : usrp = uhd.usrp.MultiUSRP(f"addr=192.168.30.2") duration =10.0 start_time_spec = uhd.libpyuhd.types.time_spec(usrp.get_time_now().get_real_secs() +1.0) rx_rates = [390625.0*2,3906

[USRP-users] Re: N300 device not found

On 16/12/2024 03:18, yibinden...@outlook.com wrote: Hi all, I encountered some issues while configuring the N300. The N300 responds to my ping requests, but the host cannot find the device using uhd_find_devices while correctly detecting b210 devices. I referred to this post on StackOverflo

[USRP-users] Re: Sampling channels at different rates

On 16/12/2024 09:44, Christophe Grimault wrote: Hello Brian, Thank you for this quick answer. So I guess this is not a limitation related to using Python vs C++/boost ? Right ? I understand that using the same streamer is tricky. Concerning your advice to go with 2 streamers, you think thi

[USRP-users] Re: Why is IQ cal disabled when using external LO

On 10/12/2024 13:42, Eugene Grayver wrote: Hi, I just noticed that the calibration tables are disabled/ignored when external LO is used.  Why is that?  I understand that the automatic calibration utilities will not work (over frequency). However, we are generating those tables ourselves, and

[USRP-users] Re: Blocker issue with NI-2943R (=Ettus x310) PCIe connectivity

On 10/12/2024 11:44, Martin Braun wrote: BTW, if you are able to get a 10 GbE card, you can exceed the rates of the PCIe link, with almost no downsides compared to PCIe. --M I will second this.   10GiGe cards for PCs are not expensive these days, neither are the SFP+ optical transceivers.  S

[USRP-users] Re: Finding a case for the white B200

On 08/12/2024 22:01, Maurycy Z wrote: Does anyone know where I could find a case for the older white PCB USRP B200? I can't find one on the Ettus site. They don't exist.  By the time NI/Ettus started making cases for the B200, the white-PCB B200 was already   supplanted by the newer boards w

[USRP-users] Re: Under and Overflow Problems Very Regular

perhaps "OnDemand") should be doing just fine at considerably more   than 2.5Msps. Something I forgot to clarify.  What OS?  If Linux, are you running it in a VM, or on "bare metal"?? ------------ *From:* Marcus D.

[USRP-users] Re: Under and Overflow Problems Very Regular

On 05/12/2024 18:15, Arnaldo Sans wrote: Hello Team, I am operating a set of X310 in communication link, and I seem to be encountering data under and overflow problems very regular while operating at 2.5Msps… my target is at least 100MSps.  Are there any suggestions you can offer?  My MCR is

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >