Eddy Beliveau wrote:
- Message d'origine - De : "Michael Scheidell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : "ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "spamassassin-users"
Envoyé : 27 mars 2008 10:04
Objet : Re: Spam abuse report plugin
From: ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:36:04 +0530
To: spam
mouss wrote:
he's not the only one... seems there's a lot of backscatter coming in
these days.
I guess the reason is that it is so easy to make a mistake in a
mailserver configuration that enables backscatter...
We recently discovered that even our own mailserver (Postfix) was a
backscatter
Hello,
Recently I installed some rbl rules, using DNS, enabled rbl checks in
the config etc. It all works fine with spamassassin < message. I see
several scores from blacklists, so it is working.
The problem is, spamc/spamd don't use these rules, they simply ignore
rbl for the same kind of spam.
Hello,
small question, are there test samples or something similar to verify
that stuff like SPF and Razor are working correctly as they should?
Thank you very much
Chris
Hello there,
since I read it in the todo of the OCR Plugin that the words are still
hardcoded and since I wanted to contribute something too, I modified the
plugin so the words can be configured in the cf file...
I have attached both the new pm file and the cf file.
If you like it, please put i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
I recently had the idea to write a plugin, which scans for obfuscated
words according to a given list of words, which are often obfuscated
(to avoid simple word filters). Looking at most of my spam, spammers
seem to obfuscate always the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> On 8/6/2006 7:50 AM, decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I recently had the idea to write a plugin, which scans for
>> obfusca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
today we received a non-recognized spam mail which contained only
plaintext + an email address to write to.
The email was [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I wanted to see if uribl maybe
lists the domain.
The command
hostx -t TXT summerdayzz.com.multi.u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains fuzzy
matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
intentional obfuscations in the text don't make the recogni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
I only wanted to add a small note: I recently saw gifs that cannot be
converted using imagemagick because they are either sloppy generated
or with intention partly corrupted. Please think about using giftopnm
and jpegtopnm instead. If yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
as I recently mentioned in the FuzzyOcr Thread, I found quite a lot
mails that contain broken or corrupted gifs.
I found one type that lets convert calculate extremely long and then
fails, but with giftopnm it works after it spits out s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Keller wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Aside from the experimental OCR some folks are trying, what SA
>> techniques are folks having good luck with for stopping those
>> stock spams that are multiple, vertical im
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:26:18 AM, decoder decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
>> Jeff Chan wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:08:04 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
> intentional o
decoder wrote:
> decoder wrote:
> >> Hello there,
> >>
> >> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> >> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, John Andersen wrote:
>> Are you sure its perfect? I've seem many of these where they are
>> intentionally corrupting the last portion (bottom edge) of the
>> image so as to avoid simple size or hashing tech
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
>> Here's the pic in question as original gif (I joined the parts to
>> make it easier for gocr):
>> http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.gif and converted to pnm:
>> http://www.matthias-keller.ch/ocrmail.pnm
>>
>> And here's what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Expertsites, Inc. wrote:
>> decoder wrote:
>>
>> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>>
>> Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
>> giffix for broken gifs, detect i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spamassassin List wrote:
>>> decoder wrote:
>>>
>>> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>>>
>>> Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png,
>>> invoked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spamassassin List wrote:
>> Spamassassin List wrote:
>>>>> decoder wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>>>>>
>>>>> Major changes: Re
g
>
>>> Spamassassin List wrote:
>>>>>> decoder wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png,
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
> intentional o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Keller wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> decoder wrote:
>>
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Coffey, Neal wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> You can now obtain the plugin as a tarball, the download URL is
>> at the end of the wiki page.
>> (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin)
>>
>
> I haven't i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave . wrote:
> Give them code from Ocr.pm:
>
> --- foreach my $p (
> $pms->{msg}->find_parts("image") ) { my ( $ctype, $boundary,
> $charset, $name ) = Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::parse_content_type(
> $p->get_header('content-type') ); i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
> intentional o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> Simon Standley wrote:
>> Hi Gang,
>>
>> I've had the latest FuzzyOcr on test for the past day or so - very
nice work. Congrats to all involved.
>>
>> Thought you may be interested in the attached GIF. It was only a
matter o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> Simon Standley wrote:
>> Hi Gang,
>>
>> I've had the latest FuzzyOcr on test for the past day or so -
>> very nice work. Congrats to all involved.
>>
>> Thought you may be interested in the attached GIF. It was only a
>> ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:46:51PM +0200, decoder wrote:
>> gocr features a nice parameter called -d. It is able to remove
>> smaller particles before scanning, compare these results:
>
> So my problem
7;m using gentoo I always have the newest versions ready here.
You probably need to build it from source to use this :)
Chris
>
> Thanx
>
> Si.
>
> -Original Message- From: decoder
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 August 2006 19:47 To:
> users@spamassassi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> Downloaded and installed the latest FuzzyOCR 2.1c
>
> Ran the tests and the jpg and png ones worked fine, but for the gif
> sample I received:
>
> spamassassin -t (null): EOF / read error reading magic number Broken pipe
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
enediel gonzalez wrote:
> Hello I have the problem that now we are receiving spams and all
> the content was written in one image attached into the email, in
> this conditions the rules to check words, phrases, etc , don't work
>
>
> Thanks in advance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
>> Rob Mangiafico wrote:
>>> Downloaded and installed the latest FuzzyOCR 2.1c
>>>
>>> Ran the tests and the jpg and png ones worked fine, b
pdxbrit wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I installed the ocrtext plugin yesterday, and although running it doesn't
> appear to block any of the GIF spams I receive, its analyzing them, just not
> coming up with anything.
>
> So I just found the FuzzyOcr plugin, but it doesn't seem to be executed by
> spamd
Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> Does anyone have an "anti word" based PM/CF file-set? I don't want to
> reinvent the wheel if I don't need to. Thanks.
>
> --Michel Vaillancourt
> Wolfstar Systems
>
>
I wanted to implement the functions into FuzzyOcr maybe, and rename the
plug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pdxbrit wrote:
>
> decoder wrote:
>>
>> I assume you did restart spamd? If so, set the verbose level in
>> FuzzyOcr.cf to 2, that enables debug messages and creates debug
>> out files in the current directory which contai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I installed libjpeg-devel, libpng-devel, and libtiff-devel, then I
> DL and compiled netpbm-10.34 from source. it all went well, and
> now I have all 3 of those convertor executables on my system. i
> then ran some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I used some recipes found with the help of this list that pretty
> much wiped out these images spams until this morning they are
> coming through again different, of course. Is the OCR solution what
> I need to do? If so, ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Agent Smith wrote:
> I installed fuzzyocr according to the installation manual at
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>
> I am running fc5 and had netpbm installed already but I had to get
> gocr and giffix by installing libungif-4.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
since SpamAssassin supports the hashcash signatures but support for
MUAs is rare, I wrote a plugin which is able to stamp all outgoing
emails of a postfix server. If anyone is interested in testing this
alpha version of the content_filte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Vaillancourt wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> since SpamAssassin supports the hashcash signatures but support
>> for MUAs is rare, I wrote a plugin which is able to stamp all
>> outgoing emails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kelson wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> basically, it is a per recipient hash generation that assures that a
>> specific amount of time was required to compute this hash per
>> recipient. Spammers don't have this time, they send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Coffey, Neal wrote:
> Dirk Bonengel wrote:
>> Kelson schrieb:
>>> So they get a bigger botnet. There's no shortage of
>>> compromised machines out there.
>>>
>> Maybe so. But it sure will be more expensive for most spammers to
>> rent 10 times as many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fletcher Mattox wrote:
> I seem to be missing something on the configuration of FuzzyOcr, or
> perhaps my knowledge of how to install plugins is lacking. I
> initially put this line in /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre:
>
> loadplugin FuzzyOcr /etc/mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Coffey, Neal wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>
>> Mailing lists dont stamp anything. Read the hashcash FAQ part
>> about mailing lists.
>
> Ok; you're right. Apologies for not reading up on it better.
> Reading through the wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Seems like I have to specify rule priority above 500 for fuzzy_ocr rules,
> otherwise the focr_autodisable_score is mostly ineffective as it misses
> half the SARE and similar meta rules. Something like:
>
> priority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just trying to set this up and during the --lint i get this error
>
> [16505] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-existent
> rule FUZZY_OCR_CORRUPT_IMG [16505] warn: config: warning:
> description exists for non-
.pm that come with the FuzzyOcrPlugin tarball. I
> still get the image spams though...should the .cf actually be in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin? I sort of want to have an idea of what's
> right here before I go and push anything out on production boxes.
> Thanks!
>
> Best Regards, R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Keller wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ryan Steele wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Just to double check... all of the plugins currently for my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
> intentional o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be
spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr or to
solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it (and possibly
other small tools that I write). I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Allen wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>> because I feel that the spamassassin mailing list shouldn't be
>> spammed/bothered with further help requests to install FuzzyOcr
>> or to solve problems with it, I created a mailing list for it
>> (and possibly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randal, Phil wrote:
> It didn't take the spammers long to break this, by using interlaced
> GIFs:
>
> "GifFix: cannt fix interlaced images"
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
> --
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
Please send me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
>> I've noticed that for some images, I get better results with -l 160
>> -d 2
>>
>> Explanation of the params:
>>
>> -l num- threshold grey level 0<160<=255 (0 = autodetect)
>> -d num- dust_size (remove smaller clusters, -1
decoder wrote:
> Loren Wilton wrote:
> >>> I've noticed that for some images, I get better results with -l 160
> >>> -d 2
> >>>
> >>> Explanation of the params:
> >>>
> >>> -l num- threshold grey level 0<
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spamassassin List wrote:
>> Stephane Bentebba wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> i am more or less happy with my spamassassin configuration
>>> works good for one year
>>> but i have problem with a new kind of spam which easylly go
>>> throught it :
>>> spam w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Pepe wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Running SA 3.1.1, on Fedora Core 3, with Perl 5.8.5
>
> I installed gocr and imagemagick packages, copied the Ocr.pm and cf
> files into /etc/mail/spamassassin
>
> The tests don't seem to run, the pump 'n dump GIFs are
to the raw message, and the extracted GIF:
>> http://Puffin.net/software/spam/samples/0001a_animated_gif.eml
>> http://Puffin.net/software/spam/samples/0001b_been.gif
>>
>> Decoder/Chris, I'd view this as a compliment to your FuzzyOCR. ;)
I'll implement that in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, August 22, 2006 1:07 AM -0500 "Chip M."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> For interlaced ... I have no idea. Depends a lot on how the
>>> interlaced images are stored, I guess.
>>
>> Yes, exactly. Until there's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Pepe wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>
>> Which OCR plugin are you using there? If it is the original
>> OcrPlugin, then you might try FuzzyOcr instead. The original
>> OcrPlugin was more proof-of-concept, and will cause you lots
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am proud to be able to announce a new release of FuzzyOcr with lots
of new features and changes.
You can download it at http://users.own-hero.net/~decoder/fuzzyocr/
Before installing this plugin, make sure to read the INSTALL file.
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FuzzyOcr recognizes this image with the following scanset: $gocr -l
100 -i -
- -l 140 also works, but not as good.
Chris
Philippe Couas wrote:
> Message Hi
>
> How could i remover theses messages ? Regard Philippe
>
> - Original Message - *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Plenz wrote:
>> Adding a point for corrupted images is sounding better and better.
>
> I disagree. To check out what happens I converted a JPG picture into a GIF
> file
> and sent it to myself. One time I converted it with IrfanView and the
second
> ti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Friday, August 25, 2006 12:05 AM -0700 Plenz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I disagree. To check out what happens I converted a JPG picture
>> into a GIF
>> file
>> and sent it to myself. One time I converted it with Irf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Plenz wrote:
>>> Adding a point for corrupted images is sounding better and
>>> better.
>>
>> I disagree. To check out what happens I converted a JPG picture
>> into a GIF file and sent it to myself. One time I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, enediel gonzalez wrote:
>>> From: decoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
>>> I completely agree, the problem is, some implementations makes
>>> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Cooper wrote:
>
>> -Original Message----- From: decoder
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:24
>> PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Discourage
>> broken content
>>
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I just uploaded FuzzyOcr 2.3b to the download site. If you find bugs
or run into problems, please mail back :)
The major changes are:
- - Added a configurable timeout (maximum runtime) for the plugin, to
avoid any lockups/unwanted delays
- -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Andersen wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 13:17, decoder wrote:
>> Another wish: I'd like to create a database to ship with the
>> plugin so it can be used out of the box but I do not have much
>> samples here, so it wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Now if you could just ocr the whole thing as text, and pass it back to
> SA to score!
I explained before why this is not going to happen really soon:
a) It is VERY hard to realize. To preserve the message, you would need
two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Andersen wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 13:39, decoder wrote:
>> Maybe it would. But this kind of hash is no real "hash". It is
>> just a combination of picture features that I invented... but it
>> seems relia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, John Andersen wrote:
>
>> On Friday 25 August 2006 13:17, decoder wrote:
>>> Another wish: I'd like to create a database to ship with the
>>> plugin so it can be used ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:43:47PM +0200, decoder wrote:
>> a) It is VERY hard to realize. To preserve the message, you would
>> need two plugins, one that runs as first rule, converts the
>> message to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Expertsites, Inc. wrote:
> From: "decoder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I just uploaded FuzzyOcr 2.3b to the download site. If you find
>> bugs or run into problems, please mail bac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I just uploaded FuzzyOcr 2.3b to the download site. If you find
>> bugs or run into problems, please mail back :)
>
> The jpeg.eml and png.eml samples failed to provide FuzzyOcr hits on
> my system because the messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Plenz wrote:
> Today I got animated spam. The first frame only with dots an lines, the
> second frame with spam text, the third frame again with dots and lines. The
> duration of the text frame is very long, the others are very short.
>
> Is there a co
upgrade to 3.1.4. I am still unsure
wether I should add my own timeout stuff with alert() only to support
3.1.0.
Maybe someone else here has a better idea :)
Chris
decoder wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I just uploaded FuzzyOcr 2.3b to the download site. If you find
> bugs or run into proble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rose, Bobby wrote:
> What am I missing? I updated but not png isn't working. If I switch to
> debug logging 2 I see in the log when I run the sample thru.
>
> [2006-08-26 18:16:40] Debug mode: Analyzing file with content-type
> "image/png"
> [2006-08
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdow wrote:
> From: "decoder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Expertsites, Inc. wrote:
>>> From: "decoder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>&g
this in this thread, there is a bug in this
>> line:
>>
>> elsif ( substr($picture_data,0,5) eq "\x89\x50\x4e\x47" )
>>
>> correct is:
>>
>> elsif ( substr($picture_data,0,4) eq "\x89\x50\x4e\x47" )
>>
>>
>> The tarball which is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
> Sure. giftopnm will do it. The FuzzyOCR plugin is using some
> other tool that will also do it, I don't recall what just at the
> moment.
>
> Loren
>
giftopnm wont do it as far as I tested it... it only extracts the
first frame.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Plenz wrote:
>
> decoder wrote:
>> gifasm can split them into multiple files, etc.
>>
>
> Thanks, gifasm works very well. Seems that I only have to choose
> the biggest one of the output files, it contains the text.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
A friend of mine recently received a mail containing an ASCII image
advertising meds. The mail is attached.
Anyone seen this before? Do rules exist already against this kind of spam?
Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
> Ah. Sig-file format. That is I guess a slight new twist. This
> sort of thing was popular for a month or two a couple of years ago.
> I suspect they gave up on it then because it was probably done by
> hand and not worth the ef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
someone discovered that the DB was not working properly in most cases,
please fix line 492:
It says:
print DB "$score::$digest\n";
Should be:
print DB "${score}::${digest}\n";
As a result, the produced hashdb is unusable, please de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how does spamassassin handle hashcash? It is turned on by default,
> right?
Yes but you still need to define your accept range as you tried to do
above:)
>
> I am using v3.1.2 and have in init.pre "loadplugin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> how does spamassassin handle hashcash? It is turned on by
>>> default, right?
>> Yes but you still need to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> How many hits are you getting ?
>
> Database changed mysql> select count(*) from maillog where
> spamreport like '%FUZZY_OCR%' and date = '2006-08-29'; +--+
> | count(*) | +--+ | 385 | +--+ 1 row i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Grey wrote:
>
>
> Installed FuzzyOCR and believe all the dependencies.
>
>
>
> Using the sample images I get a Pipe Error ONLY on gif images;
> resulting in no hits on FUZZY_OCR.
>
> Pipe Command "/usr/bin/giftopnm -"
>
>
>
> Giftopnm exists i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
> --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
>>> How many hits are you getting ?
>>>
>>> Database changed mysql> select count(*) from maillog where
>>> spamreport like '%FUZZY_OCR%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
since I will have a very tight time schedule in the next 7 weeks for a
project at the university, I will not be able to release any new
versions of FuzzyOcr, fix bugs, reply to questions or give support.
Instead of writing me, you can writ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
today I saw a strange SPF bug occuring. The original mail header was:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
w that it can
> trust mail.cs.uni-sb.de.
>
> --j.
>
> decoder writes:
>> today I saw a strange SPF bug occuring. The original mail header
>> was:
>>
>> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from
>> mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gino Cerullo wrote:
> On 1-Sep-06, at 7:18 AM, decoder wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> today I saw a strange SPF bug occuring. The original mail header
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ramprasad wrote:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from
mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200]) by
wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id k7T8rU6P012050; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:53:30 +02
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Randal, Phil wrote:
>>> undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected
>>> text back to SA? There should be enough variants of spam
>>> worlds to let SA fuzzily catch the one
d and use the
> FuzzyOCR plugin ( latest version at
> http://www.joval.info/proj/FuzzyOcr.html , but see also
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin ). The FuzzyOCR
> mailing list is very helpful too.
What do you mean with adventurous? Those versions published by joval
are all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
> @page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
> } P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY:
> "Times New Roman" } LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in
> 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan Hill wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 October 2006 22:23, Alan Munday wrote:
>
>> I've been following your developments and looking at how to
>> integrate with my (few) systems. But as I don't have a test
>> environment (until I have built a VMWare one)
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
