decoder wrote: > Loren Wilton wrote: > >>> I've noticed that for some images, I get better results with -l 160 > >>> -d 2 > >>> > >>> Explanation of the params: > >>> > >>> -l num - threshold grey level 0<160<=255 (0 = autodetect) > >>> -d num - dust_size (remove smaller clusters, -1 = autodetect) > >> I did *quite* a lot of experimenting with these values and various > >> helper programs like pbmnorm the other day. -l between 160 and 180 > >> helps a whole lot of spams get recognized. -d 2 can help or hurt. > >> It is good for upright text, but tends to hurt some of the italic text. > >> > >> Unfortunately there are some more complex stock gifs that look like > >> web pages with different colors of shaded backgrounds that will do > >> *much* worse at 160 than the default 128. Basically everything in > >> the darker background disappears. > >> > >> The only thing I could think of would be to run a gif through with > >> (or without) -l 160, and if it didn't scpre as spam, try it the > >> other way. But this requires two runs. > >> > >> Loren > >> > > > I've modified my plugin to benefit of all settings, maybe you can pack > some example mails and send them to me? (those that you think that > would be hard to recognize by the current FuzzyOcr). > > > Chris
Now that went to the wrong ML ;) please ignore kthx ;D
