-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Coffey, Neal wrote: > Dirk Bonengel wrote: >> Kelson schrieb: >>> So they get a bigger botnet. There's no shortage of >>> compromised machines out there. >>> >> Maybe so. But it sure will be more expensive for most spammers to >> rent 10 times as many machines. > > Only barely so. And at the same time, it will be much more > expensive for legitimate mailing list hosts to keep up with the > requirements. At the end of the day, you're punishing list > operators/hosts, and merely inconveniencing spammers. Is the > collateral damage worth it? Mailing lists dont stamp anything. Read the hashcash FAQ part about mailing lists. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE43eqJQIKXnJyDxURAmLbAKCsuxaBXxHerpXTnUP47n6Km1zvqACgvPRd 0k8MreCV7nsjmhFrCfni3iI= =3JY3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
