-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Andersen wrote: > On Friday 25 August 2006 13:39, decoder wrote: >> Maybe it would. But this kind of hash is no real "hash". It is >> just a combination of picture features that I invented... but it >> seems reliable in my tests so far. > > Not sure it matters a whole lot what the actual content is when > using Razor. If enough (trusted) people report a message with a > given text content, it builds a razor confidence level fairly > quickly. > > So what you report could be a simple hex dump of your hash, what > ever that hash may look like. > > I'm betting this could be done with razor without any action on > their part, (not that I'm recommending going around them). > The problem is, this is not a hash that is simply matched against another hash 1:1.
When comparing two hashes, a small percentage of difference is allowed on the values for better results. Sometimes it is a 100% match, but it might also be a 99% match. So matching two hashes is rather complex. If you know perl, feel free to check out the routines :) Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE73FaJQIKXnJyDxURAqW7AJ9yJ+9yPQIYOWQl8xZpT8Mf3q2YygCeLae8 HJZm5YWEk19RuOCGRS0sJ7A= =Sv3C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
