On 07/04/2025 12:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
"Simon Wilson" writes:
My results (about 1800 inbound emails across 6 days) show:
* combination of postscreen and other upstream tests are catching
true baddies enough that the VALIDITY_RPBL does not catch any for me
* VALIDITY_SAFE and
On 13/02/2025 20:16, Richard Doyle wrote:
On 2/13/25 10:25 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn skrev den 2025-02-13 19:02:
Hi Benny, Hi Levine,
tnx! Wissen.online it also the name of our company ... so we need .online
and not wissenonline.de (ist another company)
stop
On 20/11/2024 17:07, Nix wrote:
On 19 Nov 2024, Matija Nalis stated:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:21:12PM +, Nix wrote:
I'm not a high-volume site, a few thousand mails a day. If I'm blocked,
probably more or less everyone is being blocked. (Are the DNSBLs above
Yes, pretty much every n
On 20/11/2024 16:39, Nix wrote:
On 20 Nov 2024, Nick Howitt uttered the following:
On 20/11/2024 12:55, Nix wrote:
On 19 Nov 2024, Greg Troxel told this:
Matija Nalis writes:
From
https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
On 20/11/2024 12:55, Nix wrote:
On 19 Nov 2024, Greg Troxel told this:
Matija Nalis writes:
From
https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
:
Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to
anonymous users over a 3
On 19/11/2024 13:53, Greg Troxel wrote:
Matija Nalis writes:
Fromhttps://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
:
Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to
anonymous users over a 30-day period.
10k requests per 30-da
On 19/11/2024 10:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
The point of the big ugly error message is to have a big ugly error
message. MOST people who report problems with SA accuracy here have
misconfigured their resolvers, apparently because they don't trust
documentation or don't read it.
Not
The RBL's check the referring DNS Server. if you use someone like
OpenDNS or GoogleDNS, as many others do then, as far as the RBL list is
concernet it is receiving too many queries via those DNS servers.
If you want to use these RBL's, it is recommended you run your own
recursive DNS server ra
On 17/11/2024 11:39, Damian wrote:
I am somewhat certain those two lines are related and that the
"invalid DKIM result" is `invalid` verbatim.
Mail::DKIM::Verifier creates a signature with a result `invalid` for
ed25519, Amavis passes all signatures to SpamAssassin,
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plu
On 17/11/2024 11:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2024-11-16 at 16:48:49 UTC-0500 (Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:48:49 +)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
My set up is Debian 12 with their packaged amavis, postfix,
spamassassin, clamav and postfix-policyd-spf-python.
On 17.11.24 09
On 16/11/2024 23:12, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2024-11-16 at 16:48:49 UTC-0500 (Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:48:49 +)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
I am just going through my mail logs and I am seeing a lot of:
_WARN: plugin: eval failed: invalid DKIM result at
/usr/share
concerned and what can I do about it?
Thanks,
Nick
4.0.0 is a useless bitch, i'm about to install
rspamd
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:36 PM Nick Edwards
wrote:
> Venting
>
> Set up a new server today, took no time in postfix dovecot and amavisd,
> apache roundcube, and everything, then came spamassassin
>
> thankfully
Venting
Set up a new server today, took no time in postfix dovecot and amavisd,
apache roundcube, and everything, then came spamassassin
thankfully I chose to install this whilst we left for lunch, but 45mins
later to my horror it was still trying to install, why? because its tests
failed for ti
Excuse my ignorance, but what is the difference between enable dkim in
amavisd-new and having it set to 0 letting spamassassin just do its thing
with loadmodule dkim?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:26 AM Henrik K wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 12:57:32PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> >
> >
> > Amavisd-
On 8/1/2018 5:26 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
On 8/1/2018 4:58 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
What version of SpamAssassin are you using? Those line numbers make
no sense with the 3.4.1 release or either current development branch.
The last version it seems to make sense for is 3.3.2, which is antique
target as spam, that may not be an option.
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web h
27;ve set my system to
512,000 for /proc/sys/fs/file-max and 65535 for ulimits, and "sysctl
fs.file-nr" shows 17,056 out of 512,000 in use.
Suggestions? Thoughts?
Thank you,
--
---
- Nick Bright
ng data to some
of our customer care team, as I don't have time to do it myself.
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-
On 7/24/2018 1:47 AM, Pedro David Marco wrote:
>On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, 1:38:59 AM GMT+2, Nick Bright
wrote:
>So I ask: what is the best practice for learning submissions when
using site-wide bayes?
Nick, do all your users use the same MUA? There are some user level
"plu
engine in a commercial package I'm using.)
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax
y unacceptable.
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http://
mail containg it?
The problem I'm trying to solve is "how to implement a training system
on my server".
I suppose i could de-encapsulate an attachment with a script, before
feeding it to sa-learn?
--
------
On 7/23/2018 7:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
surely, just right-click on the attachment and save it to a raw-message
(eml-file)
So that's a "no" (sa-learn doesn't know how to 'right click' an attachment).
--
----
ached forwards?
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http://www.valne
Learning from a mailbox of my own spam (with full headers - the actual
mails) is quite different from users *forwarding* spam for training.
So I ask: what is the best practice for learning submissions when using
site-wide bayes?
--
---
erver?
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http://www.valne
les,
you could learn into an offline database and when done copy the files
over to the live instance (ideally by directory renaming to minimize
the window).
Thanks for the tip!
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice Presiden
imply because my activity level in bayes is
higher than a flat file may support.
Is this something I should fix on a flat file bayes DB, or should I look
at going to Bayes-SQL?
--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vic
Hi,
We've been using a separate product to do this, but it struck me, maybe
spamassassin can do this easier (or without having to call yet another
binary to run as can over mails)
Rules that look at URLs in a html message href and src tags, check the "A"
tag to see if there is a URL there, and i
ATT Moderators
li...@rhsoft.net is banned user Reindl Harald of thelounge.net
Received: from mail.thelounge.net (mail.thelounge.net [91.118.73.15])
by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with
ESMTPS id EB9C55F4EC
for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:26:39 +
(UTC)
R
headers.
Nick
On 26/05/2016 07:17, Nick Howitt wrote:
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to your SA-configuration when one thinks
he
On 26/05/2016 13:19, Nick Howitt wrote:
OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally
irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is
there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
Matus snuck in the most likely answer a while
el injection fails and you
look at it; it does not then mean you are an expert at gearbox problems.
Sadly, it seems here you have to be an expert at everything before you
are allowed to post.
Nick
Please don't treat me like a numpty. I am not. Head over to the ClearOS
forums and look for nickh and see how I respond to all sorts of people
from beginners upwards asking for help.
Am 26.05.2016 um 08:17 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 u
On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:
and what is the problem run a local
unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:105
something else. Thanks for mentioning unbound
I had never heard of this before.
From: Nick Howitt
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:11:24 AM
To: David Jones; SA-Users
Subject: Re: Odd results when using whitelisting
This thread is so fragmented now I am not sur
and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and just add
"dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to your SA-configuration when one thinks
he is capable to run his own servers?
I've tried looking and failed. Any chance of pointing me to where this
is documented?
This thread is so fragmented now I am not sure which message to reply to.
I've now installed unbound and configured dnsmasq to hand its DNS
queries to unbound on port 1053. It looks like I could stop dnsmasq from
doing dns completely (by setting port to 0), but the ClearOS webconfig
interfaces
On 24/05/2016 21:30, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:44, Reindl Harald wrote:
no-resolv
strict-order
server=208.67.222.222
server=208.67.222.220
On 24/05/2016 21:28, Benny Pedersen
wrote:
On 2016-05-24 21:40, Nick Howitt wrote:
Ok, but how does it help me? From what
I've read it seems dnsmasq can
only do recursion. If I keep dnsmasq then I
On 24/05/2016 20:53, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 24.05.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Nick Howitt:
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote
On 24/05/2016 19:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Nick Howitt:
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
Thanks for the link. I use OpenDNS and it looks like it is being
On 24/05/2016 18:11, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 24.05.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin v3.3.1-3 on ClearOS 6.7 (a CentOS
derivative) and
I believe it is invok
27:52
+0100 (BST)
In this case there are no X-Spam entries, as if whitelisting
completely bypasses spamassassin but both go through amavisd-new.
Can you help me understand what is happening?
Thanks,
Nick
clueless newbie troll
microsofts own attempt at SPF did allow checking in "from"
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.05.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Vincent Fox:
>
>> SPF is only about envelopes?
>>
>
> yes
>
> Unless you are Microsoft, who check against the From in the h
t to do to over come if it YOU disagree with it,
acting like a 2yo baby going wah wah wah rolling over the floor temper
tamping to try get his own way will NOT work.
On 1/26/16, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.01.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> Just look at the energy he's
just ignore reindl, most the world does (on the few lists he's not
been booted off - yet), because its his way or the wrong way - in his
eyes only of course, and history shows your wasting your time trying
to explain to him thats not how the world works, no-one is here to
make it work according to
Hey there,
In my final hours (34) at job X before moving back home to Australia
to start job Y next week, I would love to solve an issue I've been
seeing for a few weeks now, some domains in eval are wrongfully
hitting.
Take postfix.org for example, it has no A record, so this check should
return
On 16.10.15 09:10, Nick Edwards wrote:
>>Was there a change recently to the spamassassin code for SPF?
>>
>>Lately, any messages that come in via secondary MX's are failing, this
>>nevefr used to be the case
>
> the MX servers for your domain MUST be listed in internal
Was there a change recently to the spamassassin code for SPF?
Lately, any messages that come in via secondary MX's are failing, this
nevefr used to be the case
Most common is facebook, lately they are marked as complete fail did
someone break something? I assumed it used trusted networks or such
://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/527924
I could go on but id be here all month, and next month, and the month after
On 9/16/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.09.2015 um 04:25 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 9/15/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> A
On 9/15/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.09.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 9/15/15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12.09.15 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>>>> and no, i am not the package maintainer but
On 9/15/15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>On 12.09.15 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
and no, i am not the package maintainer but the first person who would
file a bug for *any* package which rely on a internet connection due
update
>
>>Am 14.09.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Matus UHLAR - f
Hey,
Kind of had enough of regular URIBL's not getting this stuff, so
wondering has anyone wrote any rules they want to share on/off list to
match on mismatched URI links,
example
the displayed version in mail might be www.example.com, but the actual
URI when you highlight or click on it, is foob
Greetings,
spamd is using 100% CPU on my RaspberryPi 2 B, even though there is no
email coming in. Each process only runs 10 seconds or so, but then a new
one starts. (I have m set to 1)
I tried some of the tips on the site, ran sa-compile and disabled most
plugins, but that didn't help much(at
On 5/3/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> Is there any reason
>>
>> reason="invalid (public key: not available)" is declared as "error"
>> to fail t_dkim_invalid
>
> yes, it hits way too oft
Is there any reason
reason="invalid (public key: not available)" is declared as "error"
to fail t_dkim_invalid
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid
This only occurs since upgrade 3.4.0 - 3.4.1,
On 3/26/15, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:36:36 +0100
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> What make you think you have the right to put a mail for a different
>> person to /dev/null without reject it proper and so sender nor RCPT
>> are aware?
>
> People who sign up for our service do so
On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.03.2015 um 13:10 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> bots have not learned from 55x messages EVER they dont care, they
>>>> never have they never will, they will resend their shit 50 ti
On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>>> if i need to take the phone and ask the admin if a mail was discarded or
>>> just not delivered at the moment the mailservice is shit
>>
>> get into the real world, and there
On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 13:34 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> It only applies to German based providers, located in Germany, serving
>> Germany.
>> A similar rule applies in Sweden too, and there are exceptions.
>>
>> I can reject who
On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 13:39 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> that game is over at the moment you got a complaint from the sender
>>> proving you MX has responded with "250 OK" and the message was
On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Niamh Holding:
>> Hello Reindl,
>>
>> Wednesday, March 25, 2015, 9:51:48 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> RH> i don't know the UK laws but in germany it's for sure not allowed
>> RH> because it's legally classified identical to a postman says
On 3/25/15, Niamh Holding wrote:
>
> Hello Reindl,
>
> Wednesday, March 25, 2015, 9:51:48 AM, you wrote:
>
> RH> i don't know the UK laws but in germany it's for sure not allowed
> RH> because it's legally classified identical to a postman says "meh i don't
>
> RH> walk to go upstairs today and th
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> and in fact i was *never ever* that abusive as you are all the time
> beause there is a difference in get heatet in a technical discussion or
> like you do absue for the sake of abuse
>
hahahaha thankfulyl google shows otherwise
> so you better stop making yo
ed or
moderated from most lists on the net - you only have yourself to blame
no one else numbnuts.
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.03.2015 um 13:09 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 19.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Nick Ed
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
>>> On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow - you must be fun at parties...
>>>
>>
>> HAHAHA reindl do
On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
> On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>
> Wow - you must be fun at parties...
>
>
HAHAHA reindl doesnt go to parties because , he has no friends and no
one would have him, he can start a fight when he's the only tosser in
the room.
On 3/15/15, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 14.03.2015 um 20:22 schrieb David F. Skoll:
>> On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:17:27 +0100
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, but big spam mails are extrem rare, i wouldnt invest time in that
>>
>> They are quite rare, but common enough IMO that our customers
On 2/22/15, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Axb skrev den 2015-02-21 12:09:
>> DOH! - need more coffee...
>
> whisky free ? :-)
>
when corresponding with reindl, you need whiskey, just to tolerate his rhetoric
On 2/22/15, Axb wrote:
> On 02/21/2015 04:04 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Axb wrote:
>>>
>>> Many moons ago, obviously before you started using SA, what you *now*
>>> consider "dynamic", was very static with less than than handfull of
>>> changes
>>> /release.
>>
>
g it,
>>> no more
>>> than I would waste time tucking in the shirt and straightening the tie
>>> and
>>> shining the shoes of a salesguy who showed up to sell me something.
>>>
>>> It's also not really my job to explain the concept of the bli
On 12/5/14, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>
> On 12/4/2014 6:24 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 20:22 -0600, Dave Pooser wrote:
>>> > strange, it indicates 12pt, and looks same size when returned on list
>>> > as
>>> >everyone elses, something must be a miss, hows this one? it's from
:
>
> Am 26.11.2014 um 23:42 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> fedora list MODERATED
>>>>>
>>>>> not true for many months
>>>>>
>>>> oh because you "allegedly&
google reindl and his email address he copped nothing he has not
dished out to others for years, now he plays innocent, thankfully
google does not lie, or hide.
On 11/27/14, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Anthony Cartmell wrote:
>
>>> How about you take your own advice. On any of my
On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
fedora list MODERATED
>>>
>>> not true for many months
>>>
>> oh because you "allegedly" unsubscribed
>
> bullshit - fedora devel active all the time
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-November/thread.html
>
dont mix words reindl im
On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.11.2014 um 13:30 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> my problem is pompus asswipe dictators like you who interfere where
>> not required, and go out of their way to abuse people and speak like
>> acid to them it is my aum in life to rid t
its quite painstaking but I reluctantly agree with Reindl, if you are
going to post crap like this, post details
On 11/23/14, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> No more info in public from me
WARNING
apache list FINAL WARNING
postfix list BANNED
says all anyone needs to know about your modus operandi
On 11/26/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.11.2014 um 13:19 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> how about you get fucked, dictator asswipe your a nobody here so just
>> fuck off to
how about you get fucked, dictator asswipe your a nobody here so just
fuck off to your own hole you troll every list you join you act like
god but your nothing but an offensive troll nobody
On 11/25/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
> * don't hijack threads
> * don't send "unsubscribe" to the whole list
On 11/26/14, Paul Gardiner wrote:
> On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner:
>>> I drive spamassassin using spampd.
>>>
>>> I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken
>>> me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two c
today:
(http://i.imgur.com/wjUvfLj.jpg). It's catching pretty much 100% of SPAM, and
so far, no false-positives. Thanks to the helpful members of this list!
-Nick
-Original Message-----
From: Nick [mailto:n...@aryfi.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:48 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.o
Thanks Bowie, sure enough the actual spamd process was running as a different
user. The file to configure the user it runs under is
/etc/syscofnig/spamassassin
So I'm now seeing Bayes show up in the mail headers!
Many thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bowie B
sassin run as the spamd user? (It's CentOS
6.5) I've verified the Bayes database is good and populated for user spamd.
Thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:35 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
uld be wrong? Here is a most recent header:
http://pastebin.com/J6TbrVG8 (had to use pastebin as the mailing list was
rejecting me!)
Thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 12:47 PM
To: users@spamassassin.a
a positive impact on
things. I'll update after some time has gone by.
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:17 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin working very poorly
Am 03.10.2014 u
was on this list a long time before you showed
up here, so check hte definition of stalk, you fruitcake, I warned you
what would happen if you contact me again, what happens now is your
own doing skitzo boy.
On 10/3/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 03.10.2014 um 12:56 schrieb Nick E
jdebert, (since im not reply to the bully troll)
he doesnt learn, worried about flame wars but kicks off by calling
other people smart asses, just ignore him, most of the rest of the
internet has done for a while
On 10/1/14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert:
>>
Dont pay too much attention to reindl, he is a well known internet
troll, and highly abusive to those who disagree with him, hes been
kicked off or moderated on so many lists now, most folks have lost
count, and most folks ignore him, the stain is best treated as a
stain, washed away with good rule
Kevin A. McGrail :
> On 7/10/2014 5:55 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>
>> Il 2014-07-10 17:36 Nick I ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi
>>>
>>> In the following example our mx received message with ESMTPSA from
>>> 1.1.1.1 and that ip detected as trusted.
&g
Hi
In the following example our mx received message with ESMTPSA from 1.1.1.1
and that ip detected as trusted.
Our trusted_networks list do not have this ip configured.
I need to run rbl check against 1.1.1.1.
Is there any settings to not add authenticated host to trusted hosts ?
We use SpamAssa
Hi
Can someone let me know which sub-test can i use to check only 1st real ip
addess (68.142.230.77) from this header against rbl dns server?
Received: from server (server
[1.1.1.1])(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))(No
client certificate requested)by server2 (MTA)
0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
Thanks all for the help!
2014-04-24 1:39 GMT+03:00 John Hardin :
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Nick I wrote:
>
> Another interesting thing. Today when daily cron executed at 5 am load
>> calmed to ~0. As it was before. Sa-update executed at tha
used @debug_recipient_maps and sa_debug but did not see any userful info.
Can anyone suggest how to look inside tests_pri_0 ?
2014-04-23 14:49 GMT+03:00 RW :
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 02:43:25 +0200
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 22:31 +0300, Nick I wrote:
>
Hi,
I use SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 running on Perl version 5.10.1,
amavisd-new-2.8.0-8.el6 as before-queue filter.
Today for unknown reason i noticed high load on my server. Mail flow is as
usual. About 8k in hour checked by amavisd.
Here is timing from amavis. tests_pri_0 is around 90% all the
I made a test with message size 941105 bytes and rbl does work.
In amavisd
$sa_mail_body_size_limit = 1024*4096;
Also i did not found size limit control when spamassassin called by amavisd.
2014-02-20 18:18 GMT+02:00 Martin Gregorie :
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:32 +0200, Nick I wrote:
>
Hello,
We use internal rbldnsd 0.996b, postfix-2.11, amavisd-new-2.8.0-4.el6,
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1running on Perl version 5.10.1, CentOS 6.5.
On the same server used bind9 as cache DNS server
Example of spamassassin rbl check.
header __RCVD_IN_DNSWL eval:check_rbl('rep-domai
Hi Karsten,
On 12/1/13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:30 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>> Hi, have a problem with our internal uribl
>>
>> urirhsblINT_URI uri.int.lan. A
>> bodyINT_URI eval:check_uridnsbl('INT_URI')
Hi, have a problem with our internal uribl
urirhsblINT_URI uri.int.lan. A
bodyINT_URI eval:check_uridnsbl('INT_URI')
describeINT_URI Contains a URI listed in internal URIBL
tflags INT_URI net
score INT_URI 3
this rule performs lookups if in normal t
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
