On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 25.03.2015 um 13:39 schrieb Nick Edwards: >> On 3/25/15, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >>> that game is over at the moment you got a complaint from the sender >>> proving you MX has responded with "250 OK" and the message was never >>> delivered - that is *not* how SMTP is designed to work >> >> read up on your RFC's, silent discard is permitted for spam, has been >> RFC'd for few years now replacing old 2822 or whatever it was > > tell that your angry user after a false-positive in case of important > mails - in the real world not only matters what is permitted - common > sense could help here..... >
I dont have any angry users, if we discard a message its very clearly spam, no one has ever complained about that, get into the real world > if i need to take the phone and ask the admin if a mail was discarded or > just not delivered at the moment the mailservice is shit > get into the real world, and there you go again someone does different than reindl does so they must be shit. jesus christ you have a lame outlook on life, get used to the fact because someone does something different than you, doesnt mean its bad. > a reject at SMTP level in case of spam don't produce bounces anywhere, > but the bot may interpret as "that RCPT don't accept mail" - with a bots have not learned from 55x messages EVER they dont care, they never have they never will, they will resend their shit 50 times a second without hesitation anyone whos been a mail admin for more than 5 years knows this.
