On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 26.03.2015 um 13:10 schrieb Nick Edwards: >> On 3/26/15, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >>>> bots have not learned from 55x messages EVER they dont care, they >>>> never have they never will, they will resend their shit 50 times a >>>> second without hesitation anyone whos been a mail admin for more than >>>> 5 years knows this >>> >>> in the time you wrote that paragraph you could have opened the >>> attachment, the curve of RBL rejects moved dramatically down while the >>> number of daily delivered mail is unchanged >> >> RBL blocks are still very significant around here, dont presume that >> we see what you see, same as I'd never presume you'd see what we see, >> I can say that with fact because the regions hitting our hamburg >> servers are nothing like what hits our hong kong servers, and vice >> versa > > a last reply to that thread: > > the point was not RBL's and whatz you see where, the point was that > after switch to unconditionally reject instead drop the number of > *delivery attempts* dramatically went down > > and since it is the same userbase, the same network and the same > mailflow it's not a matter of what you and i see different - it is a > matter of what i see different just by stop silent discard >
i'm confused, its not a mater of what we see different but then you say it is matter of what you see different, I think unknowingly you agreed with me. Dont think we have not looked at reject, we looked at that years ago, never changed, just like we never saw graylisting as beneficial, most the bastards still resend so we dropped that too, all it did was delay legitimate mail. Either way, the way you run your network suites you, and the way we run ours suites us. Just dont go round calling other organisations method shit or dumb or silly or stupid because you disagree with how we successfully choose to run our networks, we could turn around and say the same about how you run yours, but we dont because we know and understand "each to our own"
