On 7/24/2018 9:58 AM, John Hardin wrote:
However, unless you *really* trust the people who are providing
training data, you don't train on the submissions without first
reviewing them.
Therefore, forwarding as an RFC-822 attachment isn't a deal-killer.
You can review the submission and if you approve then save the
attachment to the spam or ham training corpus (assuming your MUA
allows you to do that).
I think this is the core of the issue I need to deal with. It looks like
it's plausible to automate a training system in several ways, using IMAP
folders and RFC-822 attachments, but in all cases it comes back to the
quality of user submissions. Since we are an ISP, there is a wide
variety of skill levels of end users, and relying on them to bring in
quality training data is... probably not plausible.
I may simply have to source the task of reviewing training data to some
of our customer care team, as I don't have time to do it myself.
--
-----------------------------------------------
- Nick Bright -
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
-----------------------------------------------
- Are your files safe? -
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup -
- More information & 30 day free trial at -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
-----------------------------------------------
