On 5/3/15, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards: >> Is there any reason >> >> reason="invalid (public key: not available)" is declared as "error" >> to fail t_dkim_invalid > > yes, it hits way too often for legit, signed mail and so produces false > positives > >
I assume you are agreeing with me, since you are not answering me because you are in no way related to the spam assassin project so wouldn't know the answer. anyway, I have zero'd this score to make this rule irrelevant
