AW: Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our TDL Domain

you for your time and the thoughts you have shared with me. Best wishes from Germany -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bill Cole [mailto:billc...@apache.org] Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Februar 2025 16:08 An: wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn ; SpamAssassin Users Betreff: Re: Request for

AW: Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our TDL Domain

his : PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999 and with website in our signatur on top: FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.999 So - do you have an idea for my problem? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.eu] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2025 18:51 An: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betr

Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our TDL Domain

? We look forward to your reply. Beste Grüße Stefan Mehlhorn wissen.online wissen.online® ist eine eingetragene Schutzmarke.

Re: GSoC blog series

On 7/1/19 10:59 AM, Shreyansh Shrivastava. wrote: > This is the third entry of the blog series. I cover the OOPs concepts of Perl > and the related syntax. This is a bit off > track when we think about SINGA (although inline with Spamassassin), but I'll > be covering SINGA in the subsequent blogs

pdfinfo plugin

Hello, I still use the pdfinfo plugin from Dallas Engelken (and it still hits on some messages). But does anyone know the status of the plugin? Is it maintained? Does it make sense to use it with spamassassin 3.4.0 or is a similar functionality already included there? Best regards Stefan

SpamAssassin 3.3.1 won't process my rules

I doing wrong with the new rules? We've never defined any custom rules on this system before. -- Hälsningar / Greetings Stefan Midjich [De omnibus dubitandum]

Re: dccifd error

, dccm(8), dccifd(8) [ ... ] regards Stefan

Re: Using ZMI_GERMAN ruleset

Hi list, the published ruleset in the update channel is much older than the ruleset on the named website. # dig +short -t txt 2.3.3.70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net txt "20100831" Is the update with sa-update still supported? Thanks and kind regards Stefan &g

Re: Help blocking this type of spam

Randy Ramsdell schrieb: > On 09/13/11 10:08, Martin Gregorie wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 09:48 -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote: >>> Each message uses a different server with different server name and I >>> see no patterns except the style. >>> >>> http://pastebin.com/sJp7Gb75 >>> >> That scored a

Re: Spamassassin stops to assign score

sons such as: - the receiving domain is not considered local (@local_domains_maps) - the message size was greater as the configured limit ($sa_mail_body_size_limit) - ... > *Any suggest? > Thank you so much in advance Regards Stefan

Re: Modul für Spamassassin gesucht

d sowas mal gebaut? Have a look at sa2dnsbl: http://www.fbis.ch/index-de.php?page=17&frameset=4 > gruß > Sebastian Regards Stefan

Re: Automatically extracted SpamAssassin FAQs

Hi Alex, thanks for those two important points. Each question and answer is now attributed with the author, a link to the original post (apache's mailing list archives) and the date it was contributed. Regards, Stefan Am 23.02.2011 14:54, schrieb Alex: Hi, I'm currently doin

Re: webmail message, false positiv

s_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_PBL eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal', 'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.1[01]') But thanks for the hint. I didn't know before that such a option exists. Regards Stefan

webmail message, false positiv

rDNS 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG Nachricht besteht nur aus HTML, hat aber kein "html"-Element 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF MS document or PDF attachment, from freemail Thanks for your help. Stefan

Automatically extracted SpamAssassin FAQs

n FAQs: http://faqcluster.com/spam-spamassassin-mail-rule-rules And here a quite good example in my opinion: http://faqcluster.com/question-2015861564 (There are some other interesting FAQs as well at http://faqcluster.com/) Thanks for your help Stefan

Re: perl experts - \1 better written as $1 ?

On 06/10/2010 08:36 AM, Per Jessen wrote: I have a bit of SA code where I strip leading and trailing whitespace - foreach (@addrs) { s/^\s*([^\s]+)\s*$/\1/; } Whenever I run this I get the warning "\1 better written as $1" which I understand to be perl telling me that the right side of s/// sho

Re: Command-line RBL check?

colored). I don't think that it gives you the whole functionality you want, but have a look at it by yourself: http://www.localside.net/scripts/ > Thanks, > Alex regards Stefan

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell wrote: On 4/21/10 1:55 PM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: For most everyone is the key point here. IMHO software in Debian's main repository is required to be "free" for really everyone, amongst other things you can lookup in the DFSG. Open Source is not rea

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell wrote: On 4/21/10 1:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse quite obviously feels that they have captured enough fishes in the ocean and are making plenty of money now and so do not require all of the free advertising that inclusion of their source

Re: DCCPROC and / or DCCIFD

nized version of dccproc. As it starts only one time and then stays in the memory, it runs much faster. dccproc on the other hand has to be loaded to memory every time it is called (you process a mail). If you process more than ~2000 msg/h you will probably make sure to use dccifd. regards Stefan

sa-update.com expired ?

http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/zmi/70_zmi_german.cf/ http://updates.sa-update.com/zmi/70_zmi_german.cf/ sa-update tried the latter but there is nothing, because the domain seams to be expired. Is this temporary or are there plans to fix that? Greetings Stefan

Re: Mailbox for auto learning

forward the message as an attachment un unpack it after receiving. Have a look at: https://po2.uni-stuttgart.de/~rusjako/sal-wrapper > 2. If technique in question 1 is usless, what other way would be nice to > let user to report a false positive/negative for training. > > TIA > LD Greetings Stefan

Re: Network Tests / Rule Files Directories

isable the Auto-Whitelist? Or simply use higher scores for "RAZOR_CHECK" etc. ? Bye Stefan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-Tests---Rule-Files-Directories-tp24750149p24818157.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Network Tests / Rule Files Directories

> score RAZOR2_CECK 5.0 Yes, I have seen my mistake (after sending the email). But the problem with DCC persists and in that case I was even able to spell a simple three-word-rule correctly. I am going to post another example with DCC as soon as possible. Bye Stefan -- View this message

Re: Network Tests / Rule Files Directories

figuration option that can be tweaked for better performance? Bye Stefan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-Tests---Rule-Files-Directories-tp24750149p24774136.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Network Tests / Rule Files Directories

ately this is not working, neither for DCC nor for Razor. I know the config file /home/stefan/.spamassassin/user_prefs is read and working since my blacklist-entries are recognized, as is "report_safe 0". So which lines do I have to add in order for all mails which are recognized by either D

Re: RelayCountry Check

t; at all. > > > > How do you use SA? e.g. spamass-milter doesn't push all headers to > > message, > > only those it has compiled in (a bug imho)... > > AmavisD-new is used. I have installed other SA plugins eg. BotNet and they > are working fine. see: http://www.mail-archive.com/amavis- u...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg11080.html > > Best Regards, Greetings Stefan

Re: I have an SA problem with Thunderbird.

me to "bounce" the message to the alias (instead of > forwarding it. You may try sal-wrapper.pl (see: https://po2.uni-stuttgart.de/~rusjako/sal- wrapper) as the pipe Script. You forward a message as an attachment to the alias and the script will unpack the message and feed it to sa-learn. Greetings Stefan

Re: spamassassin doesn't use modified @INC

Mark Martinec: > Stefan, > > > amavisd does not modify @INC nor use the 'use lib' pragma/module. > > > %ENV: > > PERL5LIB="/usr/local/perl/lib:/usr/local/perl/lib/arch" > > Note that amavisd runs in taint mode, so this will be ign

spamassassin doesn't use modified @INC

ad-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/RelayCountry.pm line 68. My question is now: How can I tell spamassassin to use the right (modified) @INC array? Greetings Stefan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED ??

off amavis, but still the header contains X-SpamScore: 0 tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED Spamassassin is called in /etc/procmailrc: :0 hbfw | /usr/bin/spamc That's all and there are no user-defined files to procmail or SA. Stefan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabbl

tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED ??

finde any. A search with Google didn't help either. So, any suggestions from the list members where I can define the size that has been exceeded? Thanks, Stefan

Re: ZMI-GERMAN: question to the users

Am 03. Jun 2009 um 08:57 CEST schrieb Timo Schoeler: > thus Michael Monnerie spake: >> But maybe, if response and urge is high, I will include them. What do >> you think? Is it spam for you? > > Hi, > > yes, this is spam. ack mfg Stefan -- "Der Holocau

Re: Another bad kind of spams, for Pfizer knockoffs with image

line: "l ls lo x vagra loo mg lo x cals omg" | 2009-04-24 22:30:08 [9756] Scanset "ocrad" found word "viagra" with fuzz of 0. | line: " viagra hot offer" | 2009-04-24 22:30:08 [9756] Scanset "ocrad" generates enough hits

Re: spamassassin.cf Vim syntax file

r support for languages and other things, > plus some bug-fixing of various elements imported from the perl > highlighting that I started with as a base. Thanks > Stefan Luetje wrote: > > au BufRead,BufNewFile *.cf,user_prefs setfiletype spamassassin > > Thanks, Stefan.

Re: sought.rules.yerp.org site down?

seems that the dns name isn't working.. anybody else the problem? dig @195.230.160.10 sought.rules.yerp.org ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> @195.230.160.10 sought.rules.yerp.org ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 655 ;; flags:

Re: spam not classified

I checked my configuration and had a misconfiguration in my mimedefang setup. # By default, SpamAssassin will run RBL checks. If your ISP already # does this, set this to 1. skip_rbl_checks 0 skip_rbl_checks was set to 1 :( thx for your help

Re: spam not classified

I've updatet the file with the headers: http://pastebin.com/m6e31520c

spam not classified

Hello! Since a month, I always get the same spam again and again. Has somebody else this problem whith such mails: http://pastebin.com/m63db288f thx Bru

Re: spamassassin.cf Vim syntax file

s to: , | ugroup filetypedetect | au BufRead,BufNewFile *.cf,user_prefs setfiletype spamassassin | augroup END ` Sorry, my English is very bad Greets Stefan -- Stefan Lütje ske...@jabber.ccc.de Key fingerprint = BCB2 48E4 9211 C975 5A3F B192 9B6E CCCF 99CC 44FA signa

Re: accept only gpg/pgp mail

Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::OpenPGP On the following page you will find more informations: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins > But since SpamAssassin is a mail scanning engine, you can write > rules/plugins to do whatever you feel appropriate. :) Greetings Stefan signat

Re: SA rules stats (Was: SARE false positives on MY_CID_* rules)

gt; Hi, > > How did you generate this stats ? I use amavisd-new with spamassassin. So I used amavisd-logwatch to generate these stats. See: http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/ > raj Greetings Stefan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: SARE false positives on MY_CID_* rules

f the MY_CID rules refer > to spam from 2006. Maybe those rules can be dismissed by now? Yes, looks like that. > mfg zmi Greetings Stefan pgpAl7yvZr98E.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Russian spam

0 to spam from first-time senders ` My user_prefs: <ftp://hot-potato.homelinux.org/config/Desktop/home/spamassassin/user_prefs> Gruß Stefan -- ,-----. |Stefan Lütje | "Boah, die Schwein

optional modules

ail::SPF::v1::Record Mail::SPF::v2::Record Mail::SPF::Query SPF, I know it. NetAddr::IP NetAddr::IP::Util auto::NetAddr::IP::Util::inet_n2dx auto::NetAddr::IP::Util::ipv6_n2d What are these modules doing, what is the benefit? Thank you for your help. Greetings Stefan signa

again a false positive

comments or suggestions are welcome. Greetings Stefan PS: BTW: Shouldn't MY_CID_ARIAL_STYLE be labeled MY_CID_ARIAL2_STYLE ?! pgpkvqOfutRr9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: OT: DNS restrictions for a mail server

o. See: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-bogusmx.php "Section 10.3 of RFC 2181 points out that pointing an MX RR at a hostname which is actually a CNAME RR is invalid, and such hosts are also listed." Greetings Stefan pgpTmy47cCeps.pgp Description: PGP signature

false positive with 70_sare_stocks

Greetings Stefan pgpKuRfC4VKPq.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: force Bayes DB to expire

talled db 4.2.52. sa-learn uses 0.7% of 4 GB ram with a lot more free. So ram doesn't seem to be a problem. > > And it takes approx. 10 minutes to finish with a 220 MB Bayes-DB. Is that > > OK? Thanks for helping me out. Greetings Stefan pgpSoYfWZuilS.pgp Description: PGP signature

force Bayes DB to expire

[4069] dbg: bayes: first pass decided on 691200 for atime delta bayes: synced databases from journal in 8 seconds: 11174 unique entries (20637 total entries) And it takes approx. 10 minutes to finish with a 220 MB Bayes-DB. Is that OK

spamassassin doesn't finsh processing

//po2.uni-stuttgart.de/~rusjako/email.txt And the complete debug output here: https://po2.uni-stuttgart.de/~rusjako/spamassassin.debug.gz What's wrong here? Why couldn't spamassassin process this message? Thanks for your help. Stefan pgpTCo4r3GXo3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: collecting mail for sa-learn, how to?

On Monday 14 July 2008 16:27, John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 15:48 +0200, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > On Friday 11 July 2008 17:29, andys wrote: > > > for a mail server running email for multiple domains what is the > > > typical/recommended way to collect ema

Re: collecting mail for sa-learn, how to?

thanks for any comments, Andy :P Greetings Stefan pgpSXDVVrL9bO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: AW: i'm unable to catch these

Starckjohann, Ove wrote: nice .-) i added L_UNVERIFIED_YAHOO and GEO_QUERY_STRING to my rules, as i'm still using SA_3.17...so maybe those rules are only embedded into the 3.2x'er SA. But pls tell me: how may CLAMAV score with 10 points ? where is the "virus" ??? This is probably ClamAV wit

Re: prevent to set a score for a non existend rule

On Tuesday 24 June 2008 02:33, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Tue, June 24, 2008 01:10, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > I'm guess this doesn't work: > > > > amavis[31206]: (31206-01) SPAM-TAG, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> [EMAIL > > PROTECTED]>, Yes, > > sco

Re: prevent to set a score for a non existend rule

On Monday 23 June 2008 18:13, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Mon, June 23, 2008 14:33, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/sought_rules.cf with this content: > > score JM_SOUGHT_1 2.2 > > meta JM_SOUGHT_1_ADJ (JM_SOUGHT_1) > score JM_SOUGHT_1_

prevent to set a score for a non existend rule

time the number of rules change. Is there a simple way to tell spamassassin that it should ignore the score for a nonexistent rule? Or is there a way to set a score only when a rule exists? Thanks for your help. Stefan pgpetdmabJPi4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: VBounce FP

On Friday 16 May 2008 22:33, you wrote: > On 05/16/08 12:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan > > Jakobs) wrote: > >On Friday 16 May 2008 20:45, Christopher Bort wrote: > >>The message at <http://pastebin.com/m42c297fd>[1] hit > >>ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BOUNCE_ME

Re: VBounce FP

d|not > understood) about VBounce? see: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5884 Greetings Stefan pgpdWtTySTIYF.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: whitelist mail from own host

till feasible. > > alternatively, use amavisd-new (policy banks, whitelists, ...). but if > you rely on the sender address, make sure to reject it in your smtpd > (you don't want to give spammers an open road). Greetings Stefan pgpIAhl7Bnt0n.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: whitelist mail from own host

On Tuesday 06 May 2008 22:00, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2008 21:32, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > add a spf record for this domain incl the subdomain :-) Yes, that's a possibility, but I can not do that. At least not in the near fut

whitelist mail from own host

rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mydomain.tld But that will not work! How can I whitelist this mail without using 'whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'? Thanks Stefan pgpxQPQoLPnze.pgp Description: PGP signature

SA timed out with IP::Country

mAssassin=HASH(0x89f47 [...] Someone knows a solution for that problem? Thanks and greetings Stefan pgptof7TxCPYk.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: vbounce false positive on CommuniGate group message

oks like a already reported bug. See: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5884 > Best, > Jesse Stroik Greetings Stefan pgp03MLvc6oIv.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Different vbounce results between 3.2.2 and 3.2.4

On Friday 18 April 2008 15:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 18.04.08 12:54, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > I have two servers, one is running Spamassassin 3.2.2 and the other one > > is running 3.2.4. For each I have enabled the vbounce plug-in in v320.pre > > and have added

Different vbounce results between 3.2.2 and 3.2.4

settings? Greetings Stefan # spamassassin -tD < ~/IDE-update_report.txt see: http://pastebin.org/30552 (with 3.2.4) pgp2wkeZuLR3j.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: can not compile "sought" ruleset

s DONE [3175] info: body_0: 622 base strings extracted in 23 seconds re2c: error: line 103, column 19: can't find symbol command failed! at /usr/bin/sa-compile line 282, <$fh> line 1251. Greetings Stefan > --j. > > Stefan Jakobs writes: > > Hello, > > > &

can not compile "sought" ruleset

gt; line 3660. re2c -i -b -o scanner1.c scanner1.re re2c: error: line 133, column 19: can't find symbol command failed! at /usr/bin/sa-compile line 282, <$fh> line 4508. Thanks for help. Stefan pgpTS5uNJmCNr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: SA trusts all hosts as soon as IPv6 is enabled? (was Re: AWL problem. Assigning very low scores to spam.)

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 19:13 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: [...] > If you or your company would like to fund the development of it, I'm > willing to prioritize the work. Seriously. Otherwise, "should have by > now" does not apply to free software. Especially free software that is > easily mo

Re: SA trusts all hosts as soon as IPv6 is enabled? (was Re: AWL problem. Assigning very low scores to spam.)

Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 16:26 +, Justin Mason wrote: > Stefan `Sec` Zehl writes: > > Ok, so you're telling me that not only is this bug known, but it went > > unfixed fot over a year? > > Unfortunately, nobody who's bothered by it, has bothered fixing it

Re: SA trusts all hosts as soon as IPv6 is enabled? (was Re: AWL problem. Assigning very low scores to spam.)

Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 15:56 +, Justin Mason wrote: > The fix would be to implement support for IPv6 trust paths: > > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4503 > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4964 Ok, so you're telling me that not only is this bu

Re: SA trusts all hosts as soon as IPv6 is enabled? (was Re: AWL problem. Assigning very low scores to spam.)

Hi, Ok, I debugged this a bit more. Problem is, these headers were marked as ALL_TRUSTED: > > | Received: from mout4.freenet.de (mout4.freenet.de > > [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:6]) > > | (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) > > | (No client certificate reque

SA trusts all hosts as soon as IPv6 is enabled? (was Re: AWL problem. Assigning very low scores to spam.)

Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 14:56 +0100, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote: > [... on producing ALL_TRUSTED with these header ...] > > | Received: from mout4.freenet.de (mout4.freenet.de > [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:6]) > | (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))

Re: AWL problem. Assigning very low scores to spam.

Hi, On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:38 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote: > >The AWL is acting seriously wrong. I get some spam with my own address > >in the "From:" header, and the AWL assigns ridiculous scores to it. > Any chance you have a broken trust

AWL problem. Assigning very low scores to spam.

Hi, I'm having trouble with the AWL of Spamassassin. The AWL is acting seriously wrong. I get some spam with my own address in the "From:" header, and the AWL assigns ridiculous scores to it. I have quite a few cronjobs running which send mail with the same "From"-address on my local machine but

Re: disable all network test except ...

On Monday 21 January 2008 12:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to > > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl > > and maybe

Re: disable all network test except ...

On Friday 18 January 2008 13:46, you wrote: > Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to > > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl > > and maybe some ot

disable all network test except ...

f and 25_uribl.cf. And also deactivate the plugins for razor, pyzor and so on. But it this enough, or is there a easier way to disable most of the network tests? Thanks for your help. Stefan pgpjp3YDUrg12.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Problem with handle_user

#x27;t know why... > Well, I think you're now telling spamd it should always run as nobody, I can understand why that fixes the user unknown problem. But I need spamd to run as the user the mail is intended for so I can use per-user settings. I'll have a look at the milter-setup to see if that's where the problem is cheers Stefan

Re: Problem with handle_user

Hi Matt, On Jan 8, 2008 2:36 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Suurmeijer wrote: > > > > Jan 8 00:47:29 smtp1 spamd[11786]: spamd: connection from localhost [ > > 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1>] at port 5468 > > Jan 8 00:47:29 smtp1 spa

Problem with handle_user

to root, falling back to nobody This happens for every mail received: unable to find user '' I'm running spamassassin 3.2.4 on perl 5.8.8. I use spamd with options -d -c Can anyone tell me what the problem might be? Thanks in advance, Stefan

Re: the opposit of "ok_locales" ??

ife. ;) > > > Maybe the devs can briefly explain how the charset is being determined. > Or at least, where exactly in the code one could find it... > > guenther - who is too lazy to dig through all the code right now :) Bye Stefan pgpYZDQf0pfsw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: the opposit of "ok_locales" ??

On Friday 07 December 2007 20:42, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 08:38 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > > Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > > Let's assume you running a mailrelay for a university and your users > > > are from different countries. Le

Re: the opposit of "ok_locales" ??

nd somebody else should find the mistake, why some mails from Sweden are considered as spam. This can be trap. I know this is a case with a lot of "if", but I mean it is better to have good readable configuration than to prevent a second parameter which does nearly the same as the first one. Greetings Stefan pgph0EGI6iPge.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Is it possible to detect/undo report_safe?

y/tmail silently drops headers with unencoded 8-bit chars, etc. Will have a look at gmime, but it seems that there should be probably some premade thing for this ;) Regards, Stefan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Is it possible to detect/undo report_safe?

o, it's X-TUD-HRZ-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TUD-HRZ-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, etc ... they don't add an X-Spam-Checker-Version either. Anything i can do about that? Regards, Stefan

Re: Is it possible to detect/undo report_safe?

on't trust the other servers (false positive rate is too high, mainly because the bayesian filter there isn't properly trained). Thanks for the spamassassin -d hint. Regards, Stefan

Re: Is it possible to detect/undo report_safe?

-TUD-IAP-MailScanner-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -X-Spam-Status: Yes This is a multi-part message in MIME format... All it did was remove the X-Spam-Status header, not the encapsulation. Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Stefan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Is it possible to detect/undo report_safe?

;my" spamassassin did, not those from others (they mangle the headers too, it's X-TUD-HRZ-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TUD-HRZ-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, etc ... they don't add an X-Spam-Checker-Version either. Anything i can do about that? Regards, Stefan

Re: perl script which extract a mail from the appendix of an other mail

On Monday 19 November 2007 06:08, ram wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 23:36 +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I need a perl script which is able to extract a mail from the appendix of > > an other mail. > > The idea is that people can send me m

Is it possible to detect/undo report_safe?

it has been done ... Regards, Stefan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

perl script which extract a mail from the appendix of an other mail

untouched and seams to better as an bounce. Thanks Stefan pgpEr9z6KZtoJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Disabling speciffic RBLs

skip all RBL checks use: "skip_rbl_checks 1" > Thanks. > > Gordan Bye Stefan pgp72P1YMvu3Z.pgp Description: PGP signature

Don't use Bayes if the mail was already rewritten by spamassassin / multiple spamassassin servers in the delivery chain

by chance?) - prevent Bayes from running (and learning) when a mail comes in that has been rewritten. Is there a way to do that? Thanks in advance, Stefan

AW: do I need to adjust something on AWL

Hi Tim, Why do you assign a positive score to the AWL? Do you have such a score statement in you config? Cheers, Stefan Stefan Osterlitz - Agentur für Neue Medien Hengeberg 2, 33790 Halle tel 05201-859424 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.osterlitz-medien.de Meine Daten als VCard -Ursprüngliche

AW: spamd autolearn fails, spamassassin autolearn works?? - SOLVED

han just this one rule.. Yes, that was legacy nonsense - I have corrected it now! Are you sure SA is *never* autolearning? Yes, sa never learned in the deamon! Cheers, Stefan

spamd autolearn fails, spamassassin autolearn works??

server work differently from a manual call of spamassassin? Is there any more debugging I can get from the daemon? Cheers, Stefan

RE: Scantime on messages

Rsync all RBLs, which are listed in the spamassassin config and integrate them into a local rbldnsd. it really helps fasten up scanning -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jan Doberstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007 20:54 An: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betref

Re: lint warning: score set for non-existent rule

Am Friday 13 July 2007 18:32 schrieb McDonald, Dan: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:21 +0200, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I'm running amavisd-new 2.3.3 with spamassassin 3.1.8. I will get the > > following warning if I do a spamassassin --lint. > &g

Re: lint warning: score set for non-existent rule

Am Friday 13 July 2007 16:42 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > On 13.07.07 16:21, Stefan Jakobs wrote: > > I'm running amavisd-new 2.3.3 with spamassassin 3.1.8. I will get the > > following warning if I do a spamassassin --lint. > > > > # spamassassin --lint

  1   2   >