On Tuesday 20 November 2007 17:59:39 Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Well, yes and no. "-d" only removed 1 level of encapsulation. If you have > a multiply-encapsulated message, you need to run the unencapsulator > multiple times. :) > > As far as your markup versus their markup ... It generally shouldn't > matter, especially for report_safe, whereby as long as the message looks > appropriate, the original message is wripped out of the MIME part and the > markup in the headers/etc are ignored..
That's what i tried. http://nopaste.com/p/apfnviQKX is the mail i tested with, it's encapsulated twice. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> spamassassin -d < spammail > removed_once [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> curl -F [EMAIL PROTECTED] nopaste.com/a http://nopaste.com/p/a22grbeYo That's the result after one run of spamassassin -d ... one level has been removed, all right. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> spamassassin -d < removed_once > removed_twice [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> curl -F [EMAIL PROTECTED] nopaste.com/a http://nopaste.com/p/ab7CeZEp1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> diff -u removed_once removed_twice --- removed_once 2007-11-20 17:14:09.000000000 +0000 +++ removed_twice 2007-11-20 17:15:50.000000000 +0000 @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.01, URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.50, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.14) X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssssssssssssssssssssss X-TUD-IAP-MailScanner-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -X-Spam-Status: Yes This is a multi-part message in MIME format... All it did was remove the X-Spam-Status header, not the encapsulation. Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Stefan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
