Hi Tim, Why do you assign a positive score to the AWL? Do you have such a score statement in you config?
Cheers, Stefan Stefan Osterlitz - Agentur für Neue Medien Hengeberg 2, 33790 Halle tel 05201-859424 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.osterlitz-medien.de Meine Daten als VCard -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. September 2007 16:47 An: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: do I need to adjust something on AWL I just got a message back that I sent to a mailing list. It came back to me marked as Spam. So I looked at what caused it here is the headers X-Spam-ASN: AS1784 199.232.0.0/16 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on u15209210.onlinehome-server.com X-Spam-Level: ********* X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME shortcircuit=no autolearn=no version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Report: * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% * [score: 1.0000] * 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails * 5.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
