On Tuesday 21 October 2008 14:57, Matt Kettler wrote: <snip> > > In general it is recommended to not point a MX record to a CNAME, but > that's just to reduce repetative querries. It is extraordinarily > commonplace in the real world, and AFAIK 100% RFC legal.
I don't think so. See: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-bogusmx.php "Section 10.3 of RFC 2181 points out that pointing an MX RR at a hostname which is actually a CNAME RR is invalid, and such hosts are also listed." <snip> Greetings Stefan
pgpTmy47cCeps.pgp
Description: PGP signature
