Andy wrote
> I am writing this rather long message in hopes that I might get at least
> one
> cogent response to a very nagging problem and situation that involved
> Spam Assassin.
>
>
> I have asked repeatedly for a reason why two near duplicate pieces of
> spam, coming in at the same time, one
Kevin A. McGrail wrote
> On 8/6/2014 8:24 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>> I have a script and am trying to debug it. A file in the log folder has
>> been
>> created called hmailserver_events.log. However it is a binary file. How
>> am I
>> supposed to read it?
>
&
I have a script and am trying to debug it. A file in the log folder has been
created called hmailserver_events.log. However it is a binary file. How am I
supposed to read it?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/events-log-how-to-view-tp110800.html
Sent fro
Axb wrote
> On 08/05/2014 06:06 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 8/5/2014 11:50 AM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't know if this is fair to ask, but would you (or anyone) care to
>>> see
>>> if the message I am posting should be rated hi
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:02 -0700, Robert Grimes wrote:
>> Robert Grimes wrote
>
>> > I have changed the user that runs the spamd service to be the same as
>> when
>> > I ran from command line. I will see what, if any changes occur. I will
>> > leave Bayes alone for t
e. See:
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc740129%28v=WS.10%29.aspx
>
> Roy is going to have to change his name. :-)
>
> ...Kevin
> --
> Kevin Miller
> Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
> 155 South Seward Street
> Juneau, Alaska 99801
> Phone
I have gotten so much great information in just one day. I have plenty to
work with and can now move to a better setup that might have a better
results.
Thanks to all the helped.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/New-at-SpamAssassin-how-to-not-get-heade
Kevin Miller-18 wrote
>>Anyone want to give me the 5 minute mind dump on
>>how to setup a local cached DNS on a windows 2003
>>server? I learn fast.
>
> I presume you're using AD, so you should already have a DC doing DNS. I
> think you just need to make sure it's not using forwarders, point yo
John Hardin wrote
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, RobertGrimes wrote:
>
>> Bowie Bailey wrote
>>> On 8/4/2014 4:26 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>>>> Kevin A. McGrail wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> Second, you are getting blocked by URIBL. This usually means
Martin Gregorie-2 wrote
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:15 -0700, RobertGrimes wrote:
>> I am not sure the reference to Linux as I am only using windows. I have
>> not
>> modified any pathnames so I don't see how the backslash vs forwardslash
>> is
>> relevant u
Bowie Bailey wrote
> On 8/4/2014 4:26 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>> Kevin A. McGrail wrote
>>>
>>> First, I'm not sure the format of the email you are retesting is the
>>> same as the initial test. Put some samples at pastebin.com
>>>
>>> Se
Bowie Bailey wrote
> On 8/4/2014 4:02 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>>
>> I just got a new message that scored 0 - here are the headers put in:
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 r
Kevin A. McGrail wrote
> On 8/4/2014 4:02 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>> I just got a new message that scored 0 - here are the headers put in:
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 require
Martin Gregorie-2 wrote
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 12:28 -0700, RobertGrimes wrote:
>> First, I am running on a Windows 2003 server platform if that makes any
>> difference with spamd. The only parameter I use is -l.
>>
> If your SA configuration files contain any relative
RobertGrimes wrote
>
> Bowie Bailey wrote
>> First off, please quote the relevant portions of the message you are
>> replying to. Most of the users of this list use it as a mailing list
>> rather than a message board and cannot see the history of previous
>>
>
> On 8/4/2014 3:28 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>> First, I am running on a Windows 2003 server platform if that makes any
>> difference with spamd. The only parameter I use is -l.
>>
>> I have tried running SA from a command line and I get significantly
>> l
First, I am running on a Windows 2003 server platform if that makes any
difference with spamd. The only parameter I use is -l.
I have tried running SA from a command line and I get significantly larger
scores than what is being generated via hMailServer. I was thinking that the
SA headers being ad
I a bit new to all this so please excuse my lack of knowledge -
I am running hMailServer which is using spamassissan. I am getting some
emails through that I would think should be spam but show a very low score
with my setup. I would like to try to run the exact same email through
spamassassin mu
I a bit new to all this so please excuse my lack of knowledge -
I am running hMailServer which is using spamassissan. I am getting some
emails through that I would think should be spam but show a very low score
with my setup. I would like to try to run the exact same email through
spamassassin mu
19 matches
Mail list logo
