Bowie Bailey wrote > First off, please quote the relevant portions of the message you are > replying to. Most of the users of this list use it as a mailing list > rather than a message board and cannot see the history of previous > messages unless they happen to have them saved. > > On 8/4/2014 3:28 PM, RobertGrimes wrote: >> First, I am running on a Windows 2003 server platform if that makes any >> difference with spamd. The only parameter I use is -l. >> >> I have tried running SA from a command line and I get significantly >> larger >> scores than what is being generated via hMailServer. I was thinking that >> the >> SA headers being added was confusing the command line version. If they >> are >> stripped, why such huge differences, like from about 2 to 10ish? > > This would tend to indicate that you are using different Bayes databases > (running SA as a different user than hMailServer does). To be sure > exactly what is happening, you would need to show us the original > headers vs the headers you get from your manual run. > >> I admit I don't have any clue about BayesDB so any info will be a huge >> help. >> I will go now and read up. >> >> To summarize, the main point of this thread was about how to run the same >> message through with different options. You are telling me getting >> message >> AFTER it goes through hMailServer is ok as it strips the headers. Now I >> have >> to figure out why it scores so low. >> >> Also, I need to do something with BayesDB. > > Most of the time, Bayes will take care of itself. Occasionally the > auto-learning routines will get it messed up. You can fix it by running > sa-learn manually to learn batches of spam and ham. In particular, you > should run sa-learn on any message that Bayes scores incorrectly. For > fastest learning, run sa-learn manually on ALL of the ham and spam that > comes through (after manually sorting the messages to make sure they are > all being learned the right way). > > -- > Bowie
Oops. I have changed the user that runs the spamd service to be the same as when I ran from command line. I will see what, if any changes occur. I will leave Bayes alone for the moment; just try one thing at a time to keep the confusion down. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/New-at-SpamAssassin-how-to-not-get-headers-tp110712p110718.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
