proven wrong my arse, like everything "proven wrong according to
reindl" means SFA and does NOT make it wrong just because YOU think it
is wrong. I think its right, other members of this list think its
right and the SA devies think its right, live with it, you were
already told what to do to over
Am 25.01.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Nick Edwards:
Just look at the energy he's spent whining about it -V- the energy he
could have spent to lower/zero the score
what happened long ago but a local workaround makes proven wrong
behavior not right - see below
i run likely the most customized
Am 25.01.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Nick Edwards:
just ignore reindl, most the world does (on the few lists he's not
been booted off - yet), because its his way or the wrong way - in his
eyes only of course, and history shows your wasting your time trying
to explain to him thats not how the world wo
just ignore reindl, most the world does (on the few lists he's not
been booted off - yet), because its his way or the wrong way - in his
eyes only of course, and history shows your wasting your time trying
to explain to him thats not how the world works, no-one is here to
make it work according to
Am 25.01.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
not worth an argument when it's simply wrong and hits mostly clear ham
and is broken by definition looking at *random* headers?
cat maillog | grep FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 | grep "result: Y" | wc -l
21
ca
On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
not worth an argument when it's simply wrong and hits mostly clear
ham and is broken by definition looking at *random* headers?
cat maillog | grep FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 | grep "result: Y" | wc -l
21
cat maillog | grep FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 | wc -l
130
cat mai
Am 25.01.2016 um 15:43 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:17:38 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
one time for the PTR
Not worth an argument - masschecker set the score based on spam
corpus
lower the score and have a nice day
not worth an argument when it's simply wrong and hits mostly clear
ham
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:17:38 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
one time for the PTR
> >
> > Not worth an argument - masschecker set the score based on spam
> > corpus
> >
> > lower the score and have a nice day
>
> not worth an argument when it's simply wrong and hits mostly clear
> ham and is broke
Am 25.01.2016 um 15:25 schrieb Axb:
On 01/25/2016 03:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
masschecker is not worth an argument in 2016:
02-Jan-2016 00:22:49: SpamAssassin: No update available
03-Jan-2016 00:32:25: SpamAssassin: No update available
04-Jan-2016 00:03:32: SpamAssassin: No update available
On 01/25/2016 03:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
masschecker is not worth an argument in 2016:
02-Jan-2016 00:22:49: SpamAssassin: No update available
03-Jan-2016 00:32:25: SpamAssassin: No update available
04-Jan-2016 00:03:32: SpamAssassin: No update available
05-Jan-2016 01:45:11: SpamAssassin: No
Am 25.01.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Axb:
On 01/25/2016 03:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when
the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:01:29 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 25.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb RW:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header
> >> when the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matche
On 01/25/2016 03:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when
the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A
perfectly too
Of cour
Am 25.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when
the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A
perfectly too
Of course there's a point. It's intended to detect sp
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when
> the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A
> perfectly too
Of course there's a point. It's intended to detect spam software that's
relaying through
there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when the
HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A perfectly too
at least 1.5 points is unacceptable for (in general questionable) deep
header inspection
score FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 1.998 1.593 1.998 1.593
Receive
16 matches
Mail list logo
